Partial excision of the radial head or neck — removal of a portion of bone to address pathology without complete resection of the radial head.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $566.15
- Work RVU
- 7.61
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Elbow
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 7 cited references ↓
- Specify the exact anatomic location of bone removed — radial head versus radial neck, and the quadrant or extent of resection.
- Document the pathology driving the partial excision: osteochondral defect, osteophyte, loose body, degenerative change, or post-traumatic deformity.
- Describe why partial excision was chosen over complete radial head excision (24130) or radial head arthroplasty (24366) — i.e., extent of articular involvement and stability assessment.
- Record intraoperative findings including cartilage condition, capitellar status, and ligamentous integrity to support medical necessity.
- Note the surgical approach (lateral, posterolateral Kocher, or other) and any associated procedures performed at the same operative setting.
- Document preoperative imaging (X-ray, CT, or MRI) that correlates with operative findings and supports the diagnosis codes used.
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓
CPT 24145 covers partial excision of the radial head or neck, typically performed to address osteochondral defects, loose bodies, synovial impingement, or early degenerative changes where complete radial head excision (24130) or radial head arthroplasty (24366) is not yet indicated. The surgeon removes a defined portion of bone — most commonly a portion of the articular surface or a prominent osteophyte — to restore motion, reduce impingement, or decompress the radiocapitellar joint.
This carries a 90-day global period. That means the pre-op visit the day before surgery, the procedure itself, and all routine follow-up through postoperative day 90 are bundled. Separate E/M visits within the global window require modifier 24 for unrelated problems or modifier 25 for a significant, separately identifiable service on the same day as a minor procedure decision visit. Return trips for wound issues or implant adjustments that are unplanned and related to the original surgery bill with modifier 78; unrelated procedures in the global window use modifier 79.
The site of service gap is substantial — HOPD reimbursement significantly exceeds ASC payment under CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026 (see the Site of Service comparison table). For practices with the option, this distinction directly affects facility negotiation strategy and case scheduling decisions.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (7.61) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (16.95) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 7.61 |
| Practice expense RVU | 7.71 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.63 |
| Total RVU | 16.95 |
| Medicare national rate | $566.15 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $566.15 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,695.53 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 24145 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Insufficient documentation of why partial rather than complete excision was performed — payers need rationale to confirm code selection is appropriate.
- Diagnosis code mismatch: billing 24145 with a fracture-specific ICD-10 code when a traumatic fracture excision would map to a different CPT family.
- Bundling conflict when 24145 is billed same-day with elbow arthroscopy or other elbow procedures without a modifier to establish separate service identity.
- Lack of preoperative imaging documentation, causing reviewers to question medical necessity for operative intervention.
- Global period overlap when a second elbow procedure is billed within 90 days without modifier 78 or 79 to clarify the relationship to the index surgery.
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between CPT 24145 and CPT 24130?
02Can 24145 be billed with elbow arthroscopy on the same day?
03What modifier applies if the patient returns to the OR within the 90-day global for a related elbow complication?
04Which ICD-10 codes most commonly support medical necessity for 24145?
05Does the 90-day global period reset if a staged procedure is planned?
06Is modifier 22 ever appropriate for 24145?
07How does site of service affect reimbursement for 24145?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/physician-self-referral/list-cpt-hcpcs-codes
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/02-chapter2-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 04aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/coding-and-reimbursement/resident-guide/resident-guide_modifiers.pdf
- 05aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/coding-and-reimbursement/resident-guide/resident-guide-coding-reference-tools_what-is-ncci-ptp.pdf
- 06aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/quality/coding-and-reimbursement/
- 07cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/fy-2025-icd-10-cm-coding-guidelines.pdf
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the operative dictation elements that matter most for 24145: the anatomic extent of bone removed (head vs. neck, which quadrant), the pathology encountered, the surgeon's intraoperative rationale for partial rather than complete excision, capitellar and ligamentous status, and the named surgical approach. That specificity prevents the most common audit flag on this code — an operative note that describes a resection without documenting why it stopped short of a complete radial head excision or arthroplasty.
See how Mira captures CPT 24145 documentation