Surgical tightening and reattachment of the lateral canthal tendon to restore the outer corner of the eyelid to its correct anatomical position.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $369.41
- Total RVUs
- 11.06
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Other
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Clinical indication: specify eyelid laxity, malposition, retraction, or functional impairment (e.g., exposure keratopathy, epiphora) driving the procedure
- Operative note must identify the lateral canthal tendon by name and describe its condition — lax, attenuated, displaced, etc.
- Document the specific fixation technique: suture type, anchoring site (periosteum, orbital rim, or other structure), and degree of tension applied
- State whether the canthopexy was performed as a standalone procedure or combined with concurrent periorbital procedures (blepharoplasty, levator repair, etc.)
- For bilateral cases, document each side separately with independent findings supporting bilateral intervention
- Photographs or slit-lamp findings supporting functional impairment are required by most payers when billing for medical necessity rather than cosmetic indication
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 21282 describes a lateral canthopexy — a procedure in which the lateral canthal tendon is tightened and anchored to correct lower eyelid laxity, malposition, or retraction at the outer canthus. The surgeon makes a small incision at the lateral canthal angle, adjusts the tension on the tendon, and secures it to the orbital rim periosteum or adjacent tissue to restore eyelid position and function. The procedure is performed for functional indications (exposure keratopathy, poor eyelid closure, tearing) as well as in conjunction with blepharoplasty or other periorbital reconstruction.
This code carries a 90-day global period. Routine follow-up visits, wound checks, and suture removal through day 90 are bundled. Unrelated E/M services in that window require modifier 24; a separate significant E/M on the day of surgery needs modifier 25. When lateral canthopexy is performed bilaterally in the same session, append modifier 50. When combined with a distinct concurrent procedure such as levator advancement (67904) or blepharoplasty (15822/15823), modifier 51 or 59 may be needed depending on NCCI edits — verify pair-specific edit status before billing.
The code appears in the musculoskeletal head section of CPT, not the ophthalmology section, which trips up coders who expect it near 67900-series eyelid codes. The procedure is distinct from canthoplasty (67950), which involves more extensive reconstruction of the canthal angle itself, and from lateral tarsal strip (67917), which addresses the tarsal plate rather than the tendon alone. Selecting the wrong code based on operative note language is a common audit finding.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 4.16 |
| Practice expense RVU | 6.39 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.51 |
| Total RVU | 11.06 |
| Medicare national rate | $369.41 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $369.41 |
HOPD (APC 5164) Hospital outpatient department | $3,387.27 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $1,480.50 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 21282 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Cosmetic exclusion: payer denies when documentation doesn't establish a functional indication — document visual field compromise, corneal exposure, or tearing explicitly
- Wrong code family: billing 21282 when operative note describes tarsal strip (67917) or canthoplasty (67950) — code selection must match the documented technique
- Bundling denial when billed same-day with overlapping periorbital codes without appropriate modifier 51 or 59 to establish distinct procedural service
- Global period conflict: E/M or follow-up visits billed within the 90-day global without modifier 24 to indicate an unrelated service
- Missing laterality: bilateral cases not appended with modifier 50, or LT/RT missing when payer requires unilateral billing on separate lines
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01How does 21282 differ from 67917 (lateral tarsal strip)?
02Can 21282 be billed with blepharoplasty codes on the same day?
03Is lateral canthopexy covered for cosmetic blepharoplasty patients?
04What modifier applies when bilateral lateral canthopexy is performed in the same session?
05Does the 90-day global period on 21282 bundle concurrent eyelid procedures?
06Why is 21282 listed under musculoskeletal head codes rather than ophthalmology?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/21282
- 03emedny.orghttps://www.emedny.org/providermanuals/physician/pdfs/physician%20procedure%20codes%20sect5.pdf
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2025nccimedicarepolicymanualcompletepdf.pdf
- 05pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9675511/
- 06eyes.arizona.eduhttps://eyes.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/cpt_codes.pdf
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the specific indication (eyelid laxity, malposition, or functional deficit), the laterality, the tendon condition as dictated, and the fixation technique including anchoring site and suture details. It flags when the operative note uses language consistent with tarsal strip or canthoplasty rather than canthopexy — a distinction that determines correct code selection and prevents post-audit downcodes.
See how Mira captures CPT 21282 documentation