Open treatment of craniofacial separation (skull-to-facial-bone fracture) with wire fixation applied through a surgical incision.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $672.03
- Work RVU
- 8.6
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Other
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Mechanism and severity of trauma establishing craniofacial separation (skull-facial disjunction), not a simple facial fracture
- Operative note specifying surgical approach by name and anatomic access point(s) used to reach the fracture
- Explicit documentation of open reduction technique and type of fixation applied (wiring, plates, or combination)
- Distinct operative notes from each surgeon if modifier 62 is used, describing individual roles and work performed
- Pre- and post-reduction imaging (CT preferred) confirming fracture pattern and adequacy of reduction
- Documentation distinguishing complexity level from 21433/21435/21436 if those codes were considered and not selected
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 21432 covers open surgical treatment of a craniofacial separation — the traumatic disjunction of the skull from the facial skeleton, classically a high-energy Le Fort–type or equivalent craniofacial injury. The surgeon accesses the fracture through incision(s), reduces the displaced segments, and stabilizes the construct with wiring or comparable fixation hardware. This is distinct from closed treatment (21431), which involves no incision, and from the more complex multi-approach variants (21433, 21435, 21436) that involve additional osteotomies, internal fixation systems, or combined craniofacial approaches.
The code carries a 90-day global period. That window covers the operative day, any day-before preoperative visit billed under the surgeon's NPI, and all routine postoperative management through day 90. Unrelated E/M services in the global window require modifier 24. A separately identifiable E/M on the day of surgery needs modifier 25 if billed pre-operatively, or modifier 24 post-operatively if truly unrelated. An unplanned return to the OR for a related complication within the global uses modifier 78; an unrelated procedure in that same window uses modifier 79.
CMS assigns this code to APC 05165 in the HOPD setting (January 2026 I/OCE). Two-surgeon billing with modifier 62 is applicable when separate surgeons perform distinct components — for example, a neurosurgeon managing the cranial component while a craniofacial or oral-maxillofacial surgeon manages the facial skeleton. Each surgeon reports 21432-62 with individual operative notes documenting their distinct work.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (8.6) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (20.12) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 8.6 |
| Practice expense RVU | 9.93 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.59 |
| Total RVU | 20.12 |
| Medicare national rate | $672.03 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $672.03 |
HOPD (APC 5165) Hospital outpatient department | $6,048.05 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,833.49 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 21432 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Upcoding flags when 21432 is billed but the operative note describes a simple midfacial fracture without true craniofacial separation
- Modifier 62 denied because co-surgeon operative notes do not document distinct, separately performed components of the procedure
- Global period violations — routine post-op visits billed without modifier 24 or 79 are denied as included services
- Incorrect code selection — payers deny 21432 when documentation supports only closed treatment, correctly payable under 21431
- Missing or insufficient imaging documentation to support craniofacial separation diagnosis linked to ICD-10 code billed
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What distinguishes 21432 from 21431?
02When should I use 21433 instead of 21432?
03Can two surgeons each bill 21432 on the same case?
04Does the 90-day global period affect follow-up billing with other specialties involved in the patient's care?
05What ICD-10 codes support medical necessity for 21432?
06Is modifier 22 appropriate for a particularly complex craniofacial separation treated with 21432?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02CMS January 2026 Integrated Outpatient Code Editor (I/OCE): https://www.cms.gov/files/document/r13575cp.pdf
- 03AAPC Codify CPT 21432: https://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/21432
- 04CMS NCCI Medicare Coding Policy Manual 2025: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/2025nccimedicarepolicymanualcompletepdf.pdf
- 05Banner Health 2025 IPO CPT Code List: https://www.bannerhealth.com/-/media/Files/Project/BH/Patients-Visitors/Billing/IPO/IPO-CPT-List-CY-2025-9162025.pdf
- 06AMA CPT Assistant Musculoskeletal System Coding Guidance (May 2022): https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/cpt-assistant-may2022-update-musculoskeletal.pdf
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the fracture mechanism, the specific anatomic separation between cranial and facial skeleton, the surgical approach and access incisions, the reduction technique, and the exact fixation method applied (wiring type, placement sites). It flags operative notes that describe only a generic 'facial fracture' without documenting the craniofacial disjunction — the most common audit trigger that drives downcoding to a lower-complexity facial fracture code or outright denial.
See how Mira captures CPT 21432 documentation