Open surgical repair of an orbital fracture with placement of an implant to stabilize the bony orbit surrounding the eye socket.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $577.50
- Work RVU
- 8.79
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Other
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 7 cited references ↓
- Specify the mechanism of injury and confirm fracture is orbital but not a blowout fracture — code selection hinges on this distinction
- Name the surgical approach used (transcutaneous lower eyelid, transconjunctival, coronal, etc.) — operative notes that say 'standard approach' are audit flags
- Document the implant type, material, and size placed to stabilize the orbit
- Confirm laterality — left or right orbit — to support LT or RT modifier assignment
- If modifier 22 is appended, include a separate attestation detailing why the procedure required substantially more work than typical (e.g., comminuted fracture, prior surgery, scar tissue)
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓
CPT 21407 covers open treatment of an orbital fracture — not a blowout fracture — where the surgeon makes an incision directly over the fracture site and places an implant to restore orbital structure and stability. This distinguishes it from 21406 (open treatment without implant) and from blowout-specific codes. The implant component is essential to code selection; if no implant is used, 21406 applies.
The 90-day global period covers the operative day, the pre-op day-before visit, and all routine post-op management through day 90. Complications requiring a return to the OR for a related issue use modifier 78; unrelated procedures in the global window use modifier 79. Separate E/M visits during the global period require modifier 24 (unrelated) or 25 (same-day, significant and separately identifiable).
With 1,078 NCCI edits associated with this code, bundling is a live audit risk. Procedures performed to gain access to the fracture site — such as an osteotomy — are generally considered integral and not separately billable unless documented as a distinct, independently necessary service. Laterality modifiers (LT/RT) are required when the fracture is unilateral; modifier 50 applies only if both orbits are repaired in the same session.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (8.79) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (17.29) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 8.79 |
| Practice expense RVU | 7.29 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.21 |
| Total RVU | 17.29 |
| Medicare national rate | $577.50 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $577.50 |
HOPD (APC 5165) Hospital outpatient department | $6,048.05 |
ASC (PI G2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,025.62 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 21407 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Missing or ambiguous laterality — payers require LT or RT; claims without them often reject outright
- Upcoding challenge when implant use is not clearly documented — payers may down-code to 21406 if the implant isn't named in the operative note
- Bundling of access procedures (e.g., osteotomy) billed separately without documentation of independent medical necessity
- Modifier 22 appended without an accompanying narrative justification — payers deny the additional payment without it
- Global period violations — E/M or minor procedure claims during the 90-day window without modifier 24 or 79
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓
01What separates 21407 from 21406?
02Can 21407 be billed for a blowout fracture?
03Is an osteotomy performed for access separately billable with 21407?
04When does modifier 50 apply versus billing LT and RT separately?
05What triggers modifier 22 on 21407, and what documentation is required?
06How does the 90-day global period affect post-op billing?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02bedrockbilling.comhttps://bedrockbilling.com/static/cci/21407
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/07-chapter7-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/21407
- 05fastrvu.comhttps://fastrvu.com/cpt/21407
- 06mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/21407
- 07cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the fracture classification (orbital vs. blowout), the named surgical approach, implant type and material, and confirmed laterality directly from dictation. That specificity prevents down-coding to 21406, blocks laterality-related rejections, and gives modifier 22 the supporting narrative it needs before the claim leaves the practice.
See how Mira captures CPT 21407 documentation