Open treatment of a depressed malar (cheekbone) fracture involving surgical reduction and fixation of the fractured zygoma or zygomatic arch.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $468.61
- Work RVU
- 7.01
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Other
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Operative note must name the surgical approach (e.g., coronal, subciliary, transconjunctival, intraoral gingivobuccal) — 'standard approach' is an audit flag.
- Describe the degree of malar depression and clinical or radiographic evidence (CT imaging preferred) confirming the fracture pattern and displacement.
- Document intraoperative confirmation of reduction, including how reduction was assessed (direct visualization, tactile symmetry, intraoperative imaging).
- Identify fixation method and hardware used (miniplate size, screw count, and placement sites) to support the complexity of the procedure.
- If modifier 22 is appended, include a separate attestation in the operative note explaining what made the work substantially greater than typical for 21360.
- Record preoperative diagnosis with ICD-10 specificity — laterality and fracture pattern must match the procedure billed.
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 21360 covers open surgical treatment of a depressed malar fracture — the zygoma or zygomatic complex — where the fracture requires direct exposure and reduction rather than closed or percutaneous techniques. The surgeon accesses the fracture site through an incision (commonly coronal, subciliary, transconjunctival, or intraoral), reduces the depressed segment, and stabilizes it with rigid fixation such as miniplates and screws. The 90-day global period applies, meaning all routine postoperative care through day 90 is bundled into the payment.
Documentation must clearly distinguish this from 21355 (percutaneous treatment) and 21365 (complex or comminuted malar fracture requiring bone grafting or more extensive fixation). The operative note must describe the approach used, the degree of depression, how reduction was confirmed (typically intraoperatively and/or with imaging), and the fixation method and hardware. Vague notes referencing only 'open reduction of facial fracture' invite downcoding or audit requests.
If a same-day E/M visit generated the decision for surgery, append modifier 57 to the E/M code — 21360 carries a 90-day global, so the day-of or day-before decision visit qualifies. Unrelated procedures performed in the same operative session require modifier 79. If the complexity of the reduction substantially exceeds the typical work — e.g., severe comminution that still doesn't meet 21365 criteria, or an unusually scarred or previously operated field — modifier 22 is defensible with supporting documentation.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (7.01) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (14.03) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 7.01 |
| Practice expense RVU | 5.98 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.04 |
| Total RVU | 14.03 |
| Medicare national rate | $468.61 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $468.61 |
HOPD (APC 5165) Hospital outpatient department | $6,048.05 |
ASC (PI G2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,025.62 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 21360 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Operative note fails to document the surgical approach by name, triggering a request for records or downcoding to a lesser fracture repair code.
- Code billed as 21365 (complex malar fracture) when documentation only supports 21360 level of complexity — or vice versa, undercoding when complexity is actually higher.
- Missing laterality modifier (LT or RT) when payer policy requires it for unilateral facial procedures, resulting in claim suspension.
- E/M visit billed same day without modifier 57, causing denial of the office visit as bundled into the 90-day global surgical package.
- Unrelated procedure performed in the global period submitted without modifier 79, causing automatic bundling denial by the payer.
- Preoperative CT or imaging not documented in the record, leaving medical necessity for open (versus closed) treatment unsupported.
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What distinguishes CPT 21360 from 21355 and 21365?
02Does the 90-day global period apply to CPT 21360?
03When is modifier 22 appropriate for 21360?
04Should laterality modifiers LT or RT be used with 21360?
05Can 21360 and a same-day nasal fracture repair be billed together?
06What ICD-10 codes typically pair with CPT 21360?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits/medicare-ncci-procedure-procedure-ptp-edits
- 03cgsmedicare.comhttps://www.cgsmedicare.com/medicare_dynamic/j15/partb/ptpb/ptp.aspx
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/10-chapter10-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 05aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/coding-and-reimbursement/resident-guide/resident-guide_modifiers.pdf
- 06cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/mln909160-complying-with-medical-record-documentation-requirements.pdf
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the surgical approach by name, degree of malar depression, intraoperative reduction confirmation method, and fixation hardware details directly from dictation. This prevents the two most common audit flags for 21360: operative notes that omit the approach name and notes that lack fixation specifics — both of which prompt downcoding or record requests from payers.
See how Mira captures CPT 21360 documentation