Application of a halo-pelvic fixation device, including subsequent removal — used to apply traction or immobilize the spine via a skull halo, pelvic hoop with pins, and connecting threaded bars.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $501.01
- Work RVU
- 6.22
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Spine
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Diagnosis driving halo-pelvic application (e.g., spondylolisthesis, scoliosis, kyphosis) with supporting imaging
- Description of skull halo pin placement sites and pelvic hoop pin placement sites by anatomic location
- Documentation of traction force applied or immobilization objective, including any correction measurement if applicable
- Operative or procedure note confirming the connecting bar configuration and any intraoperative adjustments
- Removal is included — note removal date and clinical status in the same global episode record
- Any imaging used during application must be documented; do not bill separately unless a distinct additional procedure was performed
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 20662 covers the application of a halo-pelvic fixation construct and includes its removal. The device couples a skull halo to a pelvic hoop through vertical threaded bars, generating traction force or rigid immobilization. Clinical indications include lumbosacral spondylolisthesis, scoliosis, and tuberculous kyphosis, as well as spinal instability requiring external immobilization.
This code carries a 90-day global period under CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026. That global window covers the application, all routine post-application management, pin-site checks, adjustments, and the removal. Any E/M service unrelated to the halo-pelvic construct billed during that 90 days requires modifier 24. A new problem requiring a separate decision for surgery requires modifier 25 on the same-day E/M.
Because the procedure involves both skull and pelvic fixation points, operative documentation must precisely describe each anatomic site of pin placement and the traction force or immobilization goal. Imaging used for guidance is bundled per NCCI policy unless a separately identifiable procedure is performed at a distinct anatomic site — do not bill fluoroscopy separately unless it meets that threshold.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (6.22) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (15) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 6.22 |
| Practice expense RVU | 7.46 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.32 |
| Total RVU | 15 |
| Medicare national rate | $501.01 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $501.01 |
HOPD (APC 5112) Hospital outpatient department | $1,642.82 |
ASC (PI R2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $872.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 20662 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Missing or vague operative note that does not specify pin placement sites for both skull and pelvic components
- Separately billed fluoroscopy or imaging bundled into the procedure per NCCI policy
- E/M services billed within the 90-day global period without modifier 24 for unrelated conditions
- Diagnosis code does not support medical necessity for halo-pelvic traction or immobilization
- Billing removal of the device as a separate service when removal is included in 20662
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01Is removal of the halo-pelvic device billed separately?
02Can fluoroscopy be billed separately when used during halo-pelvic application?
03What modifier do I use if an E/M is billed on the same day as 20662?
04What modifier applies to E/M visits during the 90-day global for unrelated conditions?
05Does 20662 apply to a skull halo without the pelvic component?
06Can 20662 be billed with modifier 22 for increased complexity?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/20662
- 05findacode.comhttps://www.findacode.com/cpt/20662-cpt-code.html
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the specific diagnosis indication, skull halo pin sites, pelvic hoop pin sites, number and configuration of connecting bars, traction force or immobilization goal, and any intraoperative imaging used — directly from dictation. This prevents the most common audit flag for 20662: operative notes that describe a halo-pelvic construct without documenting both anatomic fixation regions with sufficient specificity.
See how Mira captures CPT 20662 documentation