Soft tissue repair · Foot & ankle
Surgical partial excision of a metatarsal head or associated bony prominence on the foot, performed as an open procedure.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $610.57
- Work RVU
- 5.87
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Specify which metatarsal (1st–5th) and whether the procedure was a condylectomy, exostectomy, or both
- Document the laterality (left, right, or bilateral) explicitly in both the operative note and the impression
- Record the clinical indication — e.g., intractable plantar keratosis, metatarsalgia, or deformity — with supporting imaging or conservative-treatment failure note
- Describe the surgical approach and confirm that the procedure was open, not arthroscopic or percutaneous
- Include intraoperative findings: extent of bony resection, condition of surrounding soft tissue, and any concomitant procedures performed
- If modifier 22 is used for increased complexity, include a narrative quantifying the additional work and time relative to the typical case
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 28288 covers open partial removal of a metatarsal head — including condylectomy of the metatarsal head itself or exostectomy of a bony spur or prominence associated with it. It is used most often for painful metatarsalgia, hallux rigidus-adjacent deformity, intractable plantar keratosis, or bony prominence causing footwear conflict. The procedure is distinct from full metatarsal head resection and from cyst or soft-tissue tumor excision (28104).
The 90-day global period means all routine follow-up — wound checks, dressing changes, suture removal, and standard post-op visits — is included in the surgical fee through day 90. Unrelated E/M services in that window require modifier 24; a separately identifiable E/M on the day of surgery requires modifier 25. If additional foot procedures are performed at the same session, list 28288 first only if it carries the highest RVU; apply modifier 51 to lower-ranked secondary procedures.
Side-specific modifiers LT and RT are expected on virtually every claim — payers treating this as a unilateral procedure will deny without them. For true bilateral surgery, modifier 50 applies and most payers reimburse the second side at 50%. Verify NCCI edits before billing 28288 alongside any adjacent soft-tissue or tendon codes on the same foot at the same session.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (5.87) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (18.28) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 5.87 |
| Practice expense RVU | 11.73 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.68 |
| Total RVU | 18.28 |
| Medicare national rate | $610.57 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $610.57 |
HOPD (APC 5113) Hospital outpatient department | $3,342.87 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $1,644.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 28288 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Missing or ambiguous laterality — LT or RT omitted from the claim line
- Bundling conflict when billed same-session with soft-tissue or tendon codes without modifier 59 or XS establishing a distinct service
- Medical necessity not supported — no documentation of failed conservative care (orthotics, footwear modification, injections) before surgical intervention
- Upcoding allegation when operative note describes only minor exostectomy but 28288 is billed without detail distinguishing it from a lesser procedure
- Routine post-op visit billed separately within the 90-day global without modifier 24 indicating an unrelated condition
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between CPT 28288 and CPT 28104?
02Is modifier 50 correct when both feet are operated on at the same session?
03Can 28288 be billed with other foot procedure codes on the same day?
04What conservative treatment documentation is needed to support medical necessity?
05How does the 90-day global period affect post-op billing for 28288?
06When is modifier 22 appropriate for 28288?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02fastrvu.comhttps://fastrvu.com/cpt/28288
- 03aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/28288
- 04mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/28288
- 05cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/physician-self-referral/list-cpt-hcpcs-codes
- 06aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/quality/coding-and-reimbursement/
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the specific metatarsal number, procedure type (condylectomy vs. exostectomy), laterality, surgical approach, and intraoperative findings from dictation — and flags the note when laterality or a named metatarsal is absent. That prevents the single most common denial on 28288 claims: a missing or ambiguous LT/RT modifier traceable back to an incomplete operative note.
See how Mira captures CPT 28288 documentation