Soft tissue repair · Foot & ankle
Surgical resection of condyle(s) at the distal end of a toe phalanx, resulting in partial toe removal
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $398.47
- Work RVU
- 3.71
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Identify the specific toe(s) and laterality (LT/RT) in the operative note
- Name the anatomic target explicitly — condyle(s) of the distal phalanx — not generic 'partial toe removal'
- Document the clinical indication driving resection (e.g., hammertoe deformity, infected ulcer, bony prominence with skin breakdown)
- Describe the surgical approach and extent of bone removed, distinguishing condylar resection from hemiphalangectomy or full phalangectomy
- Record any concurrent procedures performed at the same session with separate operative descriptions to support multi-procedure billing
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 28153 covers resection of the condyle(s) from the distal phalanx of a toe, a procedure most commonly performed by podiatrists for conditions including hammertoe deformity, infection, ulceration, or bony prominence causing pain or skin breakdown. The condylar resection reduces the bony mass at the toe tip and is distinct from a full phalangectomy (28150), hemiphalangectomy (28160), or partial phalanx excision (28124), all of which target different anatomic segments of the phalanx.
This code carries a 90-day global period. Routine follow-up wound care, dressing changes, and suture removal in that window are included — bill separately only for unrelated E/M visits (modifier 24) or clearly distinct new problems (modifier 25). When the same surgeon performs a subsequent related procedure during the global — say, debridement of a wound complication — append modifier 78. An unrelated procedure in the same global window takes modifier 79.
Differentiating 28153 from its neighbors is the most common coding challenge. The operative note must specify that the resection targeted the condyle(s) of the distal phalanx, not the proximal end of the phalanx (28126) or the entire phalanx (28150). Audit teams flag notes that describe the anatomic site vaguely or borrow language from a hammertoe correction (28285) when a condylar resection was actually performed.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (3.71) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (11.93) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 3.71 |
| Practice expense RVU | 7.86 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.36 |
| Total RVU | 11.93 |
| Medicare national rate | $398.47 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $398.47 |
HOPD (APC 5113) Hospital outpatient department | $3,342.87 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $1,644.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 28153 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Operative note describes 'partial phalanx excision' without specifying condyle — payer downcodes or denies for insufficient specificity
- Billed concurrently with 28285 (hammertoe correction) without modifier 59 or XS when a separate, distinct condylar resection was performed
- Global period conflict — post-op visit billed without modifier 24 when unrelated to the toe procedure
- Laterality missing or conflicting between claim and operative note, triggering front-end edit rejection
- Medical necessity not supported — no documented diagnosis (e.g., no ICD-10 for deformity, ulceration, or infection) linked to the resected toe
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01How does 28153 differ from 28150, 28160, and 28124?
02Can 28153 and 28285 be billed together?
03What modifier applies when a patient returns during the 90-day global for a wound complication requiring debridement?
04Is modifier 50 appropriate for bilateral condylar resections on the same toe of each foot?
05What ICD-10 codes most commonly support medical necessity for 28153?
06Does the site of service affect payment for 28153?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/28153
- 03mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/28153
- 04podiatrym.comhttps://www.podiatrym.com/search3.cfm?id=4755
- 05aacpm.orghttps://aacpm.org/wp-content/uploads/COTH-Unofficial-PRR_CPT-Guide.pdf
- 06cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits/medicare-ncci-faq-library
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the specific anatomic target (condyle of distal phalanx), the toe number, and laterality directly from dictation, and flags when the operative description overlaps with hammertoe correction language that could trigger a 28285 substitution. This prevents the most common audit flag for 28153: vague phalanx language that payers use to downcode or bundle the claim.
See how Mira captures CPT 28153 documentation