Soft tissue repair · Foot & ankle
Surgical removal of the synovial lining from an intertarsal or tarsometatarsal joint of the foot
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $518.38
- Work RVU
- 5.11
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Specify the exact joint(s) involved — intertarsal vs. tarsometatarsal, and laterality (left/right/bilateral)
- Document failure of conservative treatment and duration of symptoms prior to surgical intervention
- Operative note must name the joint entered and confirm synovial tissue was excised, not just debrided
- Pathology submission and report for excised synovium strongly supports medical necessity and confirms diagnosis
- Pre-op imaging (X-ray, MRI) documenting synovitis or joint pathology consistent with surgical indication
- ICD-10 diagnosis must align with the joint and condition treated — inflammatory arthropathy codes are most defensible
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 28070 describes a synovectomy of the intertarsal or tarsometatarsal joints — the midfoot articulations between tarsal bones and between tarsal and metatarsal bones. The surgeon excises the inflamed or diseased synovial membrane lining the joint cavity, typically indicated for persistent inflammatory arthropathy (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, pigmented villonodular synovitis) that has failed conservative management.
The code carries a 90-day global period. All routine postoperative care through day 90 is bundled, including wound checks and suture removal. Any E/M service unrelated to the synovectomy during the global window requires modifier 24; a separately identifiable E/M on the day of surgery needs modifier 25. Per NCCI Chapter 4, debridement performed at the same joint during the same session is not separately reportable — only debridement at a different joint or unrelated site can be unbundled.
Podiatry dominates the PUF utilization data for this code. Bilateral cases are less common given the anatomy, but if performed bilaterally, report with modifier 50 on a single claim line for physician billing; ASC facilities report on two separate lines with modifiers LT and RT per CMS NCCI 2026 Chapter 4 guidance.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (5.11) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (15.52) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 5.11 |
| Practice expense RVU | 9.84 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.57 |
| Total RVU | 15.52 |
| Medicare national rate | $518.38 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $518.38 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,695.53 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 28070 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Medical necessity denied when documentation lacks evidence of failed conservative care (NSAIDs, orthotics, injections)
- Unbundled debridement of the same joint denied under NCCI bundling — requires separate anatomic site to bill independently
- Laterality missing or mismatched between claim and operative note triggers claim rejection or audit
- ICD-10 code mismatch — degenerative arthritis codes without inflammatory component can undermine synovectomy necessity
- Prior authorization not obtained when required by payer for elective midfoot surgical procedures
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01Can 28070 be billed for multiple joints in the same foot during the same session?
02Is debridement separately billable when performed at the same joint as the synovectomy?
03What modifier applies if a patient returns to the OR within the 90-day global for a related complication?
04How should a bilateral midfoot synovectomy be reported?
05Which ICD-10 codes best support medical necessity for 28070?
06Does the 90-day global include the pre-operative visit on the day before surgery?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/01-chapter1-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/28070
- 05aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/coding-and-reimbursement/resident-guide/resident-guide_modifiers.pdf
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the specific joint name (intertarsal or tarsometatarsal), laterality, and confirmation that synovial tissue was excised from the operative dictation. It also flags documentation of prior conservative treatment and links the operative findings to the pre-op imaging diagnosis. This prevents the two most common denials for 28070: vague joint identification that auditors use to question site-specificity, and missing conservative-care history that payers cite to deny medical necessity.
See how Mira captures CPT 28070 documentation