Open surgical repair of a posterior malleolus fracture, with internal fixation (screws, plates, or both) applied as needed to restore alignment and stability.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $675.70
- Work RVU
- 9.89
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Imaging confirming posterior malleolus fracture with documentation of displacement, fragment size, or articular involvement that justifies open treatment over closed management
- Operative note identifying the surgical approach by name (posterolateral, posteromedial, direct posterior) — notes that say 'standard approach' flag on audit
- Explicit description of fracture reduction technique and confirmation of alignment achieved intraoperatively
- Type, size, and placement of all internal fixation hardware used (screws, plates, washers), or documentation that fixation was not placed and rationale
- Intraoperative fluoroscopy findings if used, even though guidance is bundled — confirms fracture reduction quality
- For multi-fragment or trimalleolar injuries, separate operative note sections addressing each malleolus treated to support additional fracture codes billed with modifier 51
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 27769 covers open treatment of a posterior malleolus fracture — the triangular fragment at the back of the distal tibia that forms part of the ankle mortise. The surgeon makes a posterior or posterolateral incision, directly visualizes the fracture, reduces displaced fragments, and stabilizes the construct with internal fixation hardware when indicated. Because the posterior malleolus contributes to ankle joint congruity and resists posterior talar subluxation, displacement thresholds (commonly >25–33% articular involvement or >2 mm step-off) typically drive the decision toward open fixation over closed management.
This code sits within the ankle fracture family alongside 27767 (closed, no manipulation) and 27768 (closed, with manipulation). When the posterior malleolus fracture is part of a bimalleolar or trimalleolar injury pattern, additional fracture codes — such as 27766 for the medial malleolus — may be reported with modifier 51. The 90-day global period covers the day-before visit, the operative session, and all routine post-op care through day 90. Anything unrelated to the fracture billed in that window requires modifier 24 or 25.
Casting, splinting, and strapping applied at the time of surgery are bundled into 27769 per NCCI policy and cannot be billed separately. Fluoroscopic guidance used intraoperatively is similarly bundled — do not add 77002 or 77012 unless a separately distinct procedure on a different anatomic site justifies it.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (9.89) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (20.23) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 9.89 |
| Practice expense RVU | 8.37 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.97 |
| Total RVU | 20.23 |
| Medicare national rate | $675.70 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $675.70 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $4,682.29 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 27769 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Casting or splinting billed separately on the same date — bundled into 27769 per NCCI; no modifier unlocks this pairing
- Missing or vague laterality — payers require LT or RT; a note that only says 'right ankle' without the modifier on the claim line triggers automated denial
- Concurrent malleolus fracture codes (e.g., 27766) submitted without modifier 51, causing multiple-procedure reduction to be misapplied or one code to be denied outright
- Lack of medical necessity documentation for open versus closed treatment — if the operative note doesn't quantify displacement or articular step-off, reviewers deny open fixation as not medically necessary
- Global period violations — E&M visits during the 90-day window billed without modifier 24, rejected as included in the surgical package
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01Can I bill 27769 with 27766 for a trimalleolar fracture?
02Is intraoperative fluoroscopy separately billable with 27769?
03Can I bill a cast or splint applied at the end of the procedure?
04What modifier applies if a second surgeon assists with the fixation?
05How does the 90-day global period affect post-op billing?
06When is modifier 22 appropriate for 27769?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 03aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/27769
- 04genhealth.aihttps://genhealth.ai/code/cpt4/27769-open-treatment-of-posterior-malleolus-fracture-includes-internal-fixation-when-performed
- 05emedny.orghttps://www.emedny.org/providermanuals/physician/pdfs/physician%20procedure%20codes%20sect5.pdf
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the posterior malleolus fracture pattern, fragment size relative to the articular surface, degree of displacement or step-off, the named surgical approach, reduction technique, and all fixation hardware placed. That detail prevents the two most common audit flags for 27769: operative notes that don't justify open treatment over closed management, and hardware documentation gaps that trigger implant-cost audits.
See how Mira captures CPT 27769 documentation