Open surgical treatment of a single finger interphalangeal joint dislocation, with or without internal or external fixation
Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $524.39
- Work RVU
- 6.44
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Hand
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 7 cited references ↓
- Specify the exact digit and joint treated (e.g., right index finger PIP joint) — vague documentation like 'finger joint' invites downcoding or denial
- State that open reduction was performed and document why open approach was chosen (e.g., failed closed reduction, irreducible dislocation, interposed soft tissue)
- Document whether internal or external fixation was used and specify hardware type, size, and placement site
- Record pre-reduction and post-reduction neurovascular status of the digit
- Operative note must describe joint exposure, confirmation of reduction under direct visualization, and wound closure method
- If multiple digits treated, each must be individually documented with joint identification to support separate line billing
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓
CPT 26785 covers open reduction of a single interphalangeal (IP) joint dislocation of the finger — proximal (PIP) or distal (DIP) — where closed methods have failed or are not appropriate. The surgeon opens the joint, reduces the dislocation under direct visualization, and may stabilize it with internal fixation hardware such as Kirschner wires, pins, or screws, or external fixation. The "with or without fixation" language means fixation does not change the code — 26785 is correct regardless of whether hardware is placed.
This code carries a 90-day global period. That global covers the preoperative day-before visit, the procedure itself, and all routine postoperative management through day 90, including dressing changes, suture removal, and uncomplicated hardware checks. Separate E/M visits during that window require modifier 24 (unrelated) or modifier 25 is not applicable post-operatively — use modifier 24 for unrelated post-op E/M. New problems or complications requiring a return to the OR for a related procedure use modifier 78; unrelated procedures during the global use modifier 79.
For multiple fingers dislocated and treated open in the same session, bill 26785 for the primary finger, then 26785-51 (or per payer preference, 26785-59 with documentation of distinct digit) for each additional finger. Laterality modifiers LT and RT are appropriate when the operative site must be specified. Always confirm NCCI edits when combining 26785 with other hand codes on the same date.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (6.44) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (15.7) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 6.44 |
| Practice expense RVU | 8.01 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.25 |
| Total RVU | 15.7 |
| Medicare national rate | $524.39 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $524.39 |
HOPD (APC 5113) Hospital outpatient department | $3,342.87 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $1,644.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 26785 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Bundling denial when 26785 is billed alongside other hand fracture or dislocation codes without a modifier establishing distinct service or distinct digit
- Global period conflict — E/M services billed within the 90-day global without modifier 24, triggering automatic denial
- Mismatch between ICD-10 diagnosis code and procedure: non-specific dislocation codes (e.g., S63.2XXA without digit specificity) flagged against a single-digit surgical code
- Payer downcodes to closed treatment (26770 or 26775) when operative note does not explicitly state open approach or fails to document why open was necessary
- Missing laterality when payer policy requires LT or RT on hand/finger procedures, resulting in claim suspension or rejection
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓
01Does it matter whether I used a K-wire versus a screw — do I need a different code?
02If I treat two dislocated fingers open in the same session, how do I bill?
03Can I bill an E/M visit the same day as 26785?
04What's the correct modifier if the patient returns to the OR during the 90-day global for a complication of this procedure?
05Which ICD-10 codes pair correctly with 26785?
06Is CPT 26785 appropriate for a thumb IP joint dislocation treated open?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/physician-self-referral/list-cpt-hcpcs-codes
- 03aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/26785
- 04findacode.comhttps://www.findacode.com/cpt/26785-cpt-code.html
- 05eatonhand.comhttps://www.eatonhand.com/coding/n26785.htm
- 06cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/chapter1generalcorrectcodingpoliciesfinal11.pdf
- 07aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/education/about-aaos-products/coding-resources/
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the operative approach (open reduction), specific digit and joint level (e.g., right long finger PIP), fixation decision with hardware detail, and the clinical reason open treatment was required. This prevents the most common audit flag on 26785: operative notes that omit why open reduction was chosen, which gives payers grounds to downcode to a closed-treatment code and deny the open-procedure reimbursement.
See how Mira captures CPT 26785 documentation