Soft tissue repair · Hand

26545

Reconstruction of a single interphalangeal joint collateral ligament using a tendon or fascial graft, reported per joint.

Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓

Medicare
$707.43
Work RVU
6.93
Global, days
90
Region
Hand
Drawn from CMSAAPCNIHFastrvuMdclarity

Documentation requirements

What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.

Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓

  • Specify the exact joint reconstructed — state PIP or DIP and the digit by name or number (e.g., right ring finger PIP).
  • Confirm graft use in the operative note — document graft type (tendon vs. fascia), source, and harvest site; absence of graft language is an audit flag.
  • Document the preoperative diagnosis with ICD-10 specificity, including laterality and acuity (traumatic vs. chronic instability vs. deformity).
  • Record intraoperative findings: degree of collateral ligament damage, joint stability before and after reconstruction, and any additional structures addressed.
  • If multiple joints are reconstructed in the same session, separately document each joint to support per-joint billing.
  • Note any prior treatment failure (conservative management, prior repair) that justifies reconstruction over primary repair.

Applicable modifiers

Modifiers commonly billed with this code.

Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual

What this code covers

Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓

CPT 26545 covers surgical reconstruction of a collateral ligament at an interphalangeal (IP) joint — PIP or DIP — using a graft (tendon or fascia) to restore lateral stability. This is the graft-based code; if no graft was used and only primary repair was performed, 26545 does not apply. The code is reported per joint, so bilateral or multi-joint reconstruction on separate digits requires lateral site modifiers and, where applicable, modifier 51.

The 90-day global period covers the operative session, the day-before visit, and all routine post-op care through day 90. Return trips for wound issues, hardware problems, or staged tenolysis within that window require modifier 78 (related, unplanned return) or 58 (staged/planned). Unrelated procedures in the global window need modifier 79.

Site of service matters here. HOPD and ASC payments differ substantially — see the Site of Service comparison table. Many payers require prior authorization for reconstructive hand procedures; confirm before scheduling to avoid post-service denials.

RVU & reimbursement

Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.

Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026

Work RVU vs. total RVU

The work RVU (6.93) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (21.18) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.

Work RVU 6.93
Practice expense RVU 12.94
Malpractice RVU 1.31
Total RVU 21.18
Medicare national rate $707.43
Global period 90 days

Payment by site of service

Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.

Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026

SettingMedicare rate (national)
Office (PFS non-facility)
Procedure performed in physician's office
$707.43
HOPD (APC 5113)
Hospital outpatient department
$3,342.87
ASC (PI A2)
Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding)
$1,644.87

Common denial reasons

The recurring reasons claims for CPT 26545 get rejected.

Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓

  • Missing graft documentation — payers deny 26545 when the operative note describes primary repair without a graft, which maps to a different code.
  • Laterality modifier absent — claims without LT or RT on finger procedures are routinely rejected or pended by Medicare and commercial payers.
  • ICD-10 mismatch — using an unspecified or mismatched diagnosis code (wrong laterality, wrong digit) triggers NCCI edits and payer rejections.
  • No prior authorization obtained for reconstructive hand surgery, resulting in post-service denial from commercial payers requiring precertification.
  • Unbundling error — billing graft harvest separately when the graft is integral to the 26545 reconstruction; the graft harvest is typically included.

Frequently asked questions

Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓

01When do I use 26545 vs. 26540 or 26541?
26540 covers partial collateral ligament repair; 26541 covers complete repair — both without a graft. Use 26545 only when a graft (tendon or fascia) is used to reconstruct the ligament. If your operative note doesn't document a graft, 26545 will not hold up to audit.
02Can I bill 26545 for more than one finger in the same session?
Yes. The code is reported per joint. Bill a separate unit for each joint reconstructed, append LT or RT for laterality, and add modifier 51 on the lower-valued procedure. Document each joint's findings independently in the operative note.
03Is the graft harvest separately billable?
No. Graft harvest is bundled into 26545 when the graft is used for that same reconstruction. Billing a separate harvest code alongside 26545 for the same joint will trigger an NCCI edit.
04What modifier applies if I need to return to the OR during the 90-day global for a related problem?
Use modifier 78 for an unplanned return to the OR for a complication or related procedure within the global period. Modifier 58 applies if the return was planned and staged from the original procedure. Do not use 79 for related work — that modifier is for unrelated procedures only.
05Does modifier 22 apply to complex collateral ligament reconstructions?
Modifier 22 is appropriate when the procedure required substantially more work than typical — for example, severe scar tissue, complex deformity, or failed prior repair significantly prolonging operative time. You must attach a letter documenting the additional complexity; without it, payers routinely ignore the modifier.
06Does site of service affect reimbursement for 26545?
Yes, significantly. HOPD and ASC payments differ — see the Site of Service comparison table on this page. The physician's professional fee is also subject to the facility vs. non-facility RVU distinction, so billing in an office-based procedure room versus a facility will affect your reimbursement.

Mira Scribe

Mira's AI scribe captures the specific joint reconstructed (digit name, joint level — PIP vs. DIP), graft type and harvest source, intraoperative stability assessment, and laterality directly from dictation. That detail prevents the two most common 26545 denials: missing graft confirmation and absent laterality modifiers.

See how Mira captures CPT 26545 documentation

Related CPT codes

Ready?

Ready to transform your orthopedic practice?

See how orthopedic practices are running documentation, billing, and operations on a single voice-first platform.

Get started for free