Reconstruction of a single interphalangeal joint collateral ligament using a tendon or fascial graft, reported per joint.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $707.43
- Work RVU
- 6.93
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Hand
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Specify the exact joint reconstructed — state PIP or DIP and the digit by name or number (e.g., right ring finger PIP).
- Confirm graft use in the operative note — document graft type (tendon vs. fascia), source, and harvest site; absence of graft language is an audit flag.
- Document the preoperative diagnosis with ICD-10 specificity, including laterality and acuity (traumatic vs. chronic instability vs. deformity).
- Record intraoperative findings: degree of collateral ligament damage, joint stability before and after reconstruction, and any additional structures addressed.
- If multiple joints are reconstructed in the same session, separately document each joint to support per-joint billing.
- Note any prior treatment failure (conservative management, prior repair) that justifies reconstruction over primary repair.
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 26545 covers surgical reconstruction of a collateral ligament at an interphalangeal (IP) joint — PIP or DIP — using a graft (tendon or fascia) to restore lateral stability. This is the graft-based code; if no graft was used and only primary repair was performed, 26545 does not apply. The code is reported per joint, so bilateral or multi-joint reconstruction on separate digits requires lateral site modifiers and, where applicable, modifier 51.
The 90-day global period covers the operative session, the day-before visit, and all routine post-op care through day 90. Return trips for wound issues, hardware problems, or staged tenolysis within that window require modifier 78 (related, unplanned return) or 58 (staged/planned). Unrelated procedures in the global window need modifier 79.
Site of service matters here. HOPD and ASC payments differ substantially — see the Site of Service comparison table. Many payers require prior authorization for reconstructive hand procedures; confirm before scheduling to avoid post-service denials.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (6.93) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (21.18) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 6.93 |
| Practice expense RVU | 12.94 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.31 |
| Total RVU | 21.18 |
| Medicare national rate | $707.43 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $707.43 |
HOPD (APC 5113) Hospital outpatient department | $3,342.87 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $1,644.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 26545 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Missing graft documentation — payers deny 26545 when the operative note describes primary repair without a graft, which maps to a different code.
- Laterality modifier absent — claims without LT or RT on finger procedures are routinely rejected or pended by Medicare and commercial payers.
- ICD-10 mismatch — using an unspecified or mismatched diagnosis code (wrong laterality, wrong digit) triggers NCCI edits and payer rejections.
- No prior authorization obtained for reconstructive hand surgery, resulting in post-service denial from commercial payers requiring precertification.
- Unbundling error — billing graft harvest separately when the graft is integral to the 26545 reconstruction; the graft harvest is typically included.
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01When do I use 26545 vs. 26540 or 26541?
02Can I bill 26545 for more than one finger in the same session?
03Is the graft harvest separately billable?
04What modifier applies if I need to return to the OR during the 90-day global for a related problem?
05Does modifier 22 apply to complex collateral ligament reconstructions?
06Does site of service affect reimbursement for 26545?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/26545
- 03vsac.nlm.nih.govhttps://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/context/cs/codesystem/CPT/version/2021/code/26545/info
- 04fastrvu.comhttps://fastrvu.com/cpt/26545
- 05mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/26545
- 06eatonhand.comhttp://www.eatonhand.com/coding/n26545.htm
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the specific joint reconstructed (digit name, joint level — PIP vs. DIP), graft type and harvest source, intraoperative stability assessment, and laterality directly from dictation. That detail prevents the two most common 26545 denials: missing graft confirmation and absent laterality modifiers.
See how Mira captures CPT 26545 documentation