Open surgical division of a single finger flexor tendon to release contracture or correct deformity.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $458.93
- Work RVU
- 3.67
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Hand
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Specify which finger(s) and which tendon(s) were divided (FDP, FDS, or both) and the anatomic level (e.g., A2 pulley zone, proximal phalanx).
- Document the clinical indication requiring open rather than percutaneous tenotomy — e.g., fixed flexion contracture degree, prior failed percutaneous attempt, need for direct visualization.
- Record the surgical approach and incision type (e.g., Bruner zigzag, mid-lateral) to distinguish from percutaneous code 26060.
- Note any concurrent procedures performed on the same digit or hand that may require separate reporting with modifier 59 or XS.
- Confirm the diagnosis code aligns with the documented contracture type (joint contracture M24.54x vs. tendon/muscle contracture M62.44x) — auditors flag mismatches.
- Identify laterality (right vs. left hand) explicitly in the operative note to support LT/RT modifier billing.
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 26455 describes an open tenotomy of a finger flexor tendon — a procedure in which the surgeon makes a deliberate incision through the tendon to release a fixed flexion contracture or address pathologic tendon tension. This is distinct from a percutaneous tenotomy (26060) and from trigger finger sheath release (26055); the open approach is selected when direct visualization is required or when percutaneous technique is insufficient.
The 90-day global period means all routine post-op management through day 90 is bundled. If the decision for surgery was made the same day or the day before, append modifier 57 to the associated E/M. Additional fingers treated in the same session each warrant a separate reporting of 26455 with modifier 59 or XS to distinguish the distinct anatomic structures. Laterality modifiers (LT/RT) are required by most payers to identify which hand.
Flexor tendon contractures most often accompany Dupuytren's disease, burns, prior trauma, or spastic conditions. ICD-10 diagnosis alignment — M24.54x (contracture of joint, finger) or M62.44x (contracture of muscle, hand) — is commonly scrutinized; ensure the operative note specifies the tendon involved, the level of the finger (A1 pulley zone, FDP vs. FDS), and the clinical indication driving the open approach rather than a percutaneous or needle technique.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (3.67) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (13.74) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 3.67 |
| Practice expense RVU | 9.38 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.69 |
| Total RVU | 13.74 |
| Medicare national rate | $458.93 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $458.93 |
HOPD (APC 5112) Hospital outpatient department | $1,642.82 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $872.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 26455 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Unbundling denial when 26455 is billed same-day with 26055 (trigger finger release) or 26060 (percutaneous tenotomy) on the same finger without modifier 59 or XS supporting a distinct structure or separate indication.
- Laterality modifier missing — many MACs auto-deny hand/finger codes without LT or RT.
- Diagnosis code mismatch between the operative note contracture description and the submitted ICD-10, particularly using a joint contracture code when the pathology is isolated to the tendon.
- Modifier 57 missing on a same-day or day-before E/M when the decision for this 90-day global procedure was made at that visit.
- Multiple-finger claims denied for lack of individual finger documentation when 26455 is billed more than once — each digit needs independent medical necessity support.
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between 26455 and 26060?
02Can 26455 be billed for multiple fingers in the same session?
03Is modifier 50 appropriate if the same finger on both hands is released?
04How does the 90-day global period affect post-op management billing?
05What ICD-10 codes pair correctly with 26455?
06Can 26455 and 26055 (trigger finger sheath release) be billed together on the same finger?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/26455
- 03fastrvu.comhttps://fastrvu.com/cpt/26455
- 04eatonhand.comhttp://www.eatonhand.com/coding/n26455.htm
- 05aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/coding-and-reimbursement/resident-guide/resident-guide_modifiers.pdf
- 06axogeninc.comhttps://www.axogeninc.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025-Neuroplasty-Tendon-Release-Coding-Guide.pdf
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the tendon name (FDP vs. FDS), finger number, anatomic zone, degree of pre-op flexion contracture, and the surgical rationale for open over percutaneous technique directly from dictation. This prevents the two most common audit flags: operative notes that omit which tendon was cut and records that don't justify the open approach when a percutaneous code exists at lower reimbursement.
See how Mira captures CPT 26455 documentation