Partial excision of the proximal or middle phalanx of a finger, performed via craterization, saucerization, or diaphysectomy techniques — typically to address osteomyelitis, tumor, or severely damaged bone.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $464.61
- Total RVUs
- 13.91
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Hand
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Identify the specific technique used: craterization, saucerization, or diaphysectomy — not just 'partial excision'
- Name the exact phalanx resected (proximal or middle) and which finger (index, long, ring, small) to support correct code selection over 26236 or 26230
- Document the indication driving the resection — osteomyelitis, benign tumor, tophaceous gout, or other — with supporting pre-op imaging or culture results referenced in the operative note
- Record the extent of bone removed and condition of remaining bone margins, including whether debridement margins appeared free of infected or necrotic tissue
- Note anesthesia type and any intraoperative imaging used, particularly if fluoroscopy was employed to confirm resection margins
- If multiple fingers treated at the same session, document each phalanx by finger name and number as a distinct anatomic site to support modifier 59 use
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 26235 covers surgical partial removal of the proximal or middle phalanx of a finger. The surgeon removes a defined portion of the affected bone using one of three named techniques: craterization (hollowing a crater into the bone), saucerization (creating a saucer-shaped excavation), or diaphysectomy (resecting a segment of the diaphysis). The procedure is most commonly performed for osteomyelitis but also applies to benign bone lesions or structural compromise from tophaceous gout or trauma. Select the correct code based on which phalanx is targeted — 26235 is proximal or middle phalanx, 26236 is distal phalanx, and 26230 is metacarpal.
The global period is 90 days. Routine follow-up wound checks, dressing changes, and suture removal within that window are bundled. If a new, unrelated procedure is performed during the global period, append modifier 79. A return to the OR for a related complication — such as wound debridement for persistent infection — uses modifier 78. Staged re-excision planned at the time of the original surgery uses modifier 58.
Site of service matters here: HOPD and ASC payment rates differ meaningfully (see the Site of Service comparison table on this page). When billing multiple fingers on the same hand at the same session, each additional phalanx requires modifier 59 with clear documentation of distinct anatomic sites. NCCI policy treats contiguous structures within the same anatomic region as a single site, so operative notes must identify each affected phalanx by name and finger.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 6.17 |
| Practice expense RVU | 6.55 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.19 |
| Total RVU | 13.91 |
| Medicare national rate | $464.61 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $464.61 |
HOPD (APC 5112) Hospital outpatient department | $1,642.82 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $872.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 26235 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Wrong phalanx code selected — using 26235 when the distal phalanx was actually resected (should be 26236) or when the metacarpal was treated (should be 26230)
- Operative note uses vague language like 'partial bone removal' without naming the technique (craterization, saucerization, or diaphysectomy), triggering medical necessity or specificity edits
- Multiple fingers billed on the same date without modifier 59 and without distinct anatomic site documentation, causing NCCI bundling denials
- Post-op procedure billed during the 90-day global period without the appropriate modifier (58, 78, or 79) to break the bundle
- ICD-10 diagnosis code does not support the procedure — e.g., a fracture diagnosis paired with a bone excision code without documentation of infection or lesion requiring excision
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between CPT 26235 and 26236?
02Can 26235 and 26236 be billed together on the same finger?
03What modifier applies if the surgeon returns to the OR during the 90-day global to debride recurrent osteomyelitis in the same finger?
04Does 26235 require a specific diagnosis code, or will any bone condition support it?
05If a staged re-excision is planned at the initial surgery, which modifier is used when the second procedure is billed?
06Can 26235 be billed with an E/M on the same date as surgery?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/01-chapter1-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 03eatonhand.comhttps://www.eatonhand.com/coding/n26235.htm
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/26235
- 05emedny.orghttps://www.emedny.org/providermanuals/physician/pdfs/physician%20procedure%20codes%20sect5.pdf
- 06ams.aaos.orghttps://ams.aaos.org/Online-Store/Product-Detail?id=%7B70926F38-F213-F111-8406-6045BD065636%7D
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the specific technique name (craterization, saucerization, or diaphysectomy), the exact phalanx (proximal or middle), and the finger involved directly from surgeon dictation. It also flags the operative indication — osteomyelitis, tumor, or gout — and links it to the supporting diagnosis. This prevents the most common audit trigger: an operative note that names the approach as 'partial excision' without technique specificity, which invites down-coding or medical necessity denials.
See how Mira captures CPT 26235 documentation