Open surgical treatment of a radial shaft fracture, including internal fixation with plates, screws, or rods when performed.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $633.95
- Work RVU
- 8.58
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Wrist
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Confirm the fracture is isolated to the radial shaft — document that no DRUJ dislocation was identified or, if present, how it was managed
- Specify internal fixation construct used (e.g., volar locking plate, cortical screws, intramedullary device) — 'fixation applied' alone is insufficient for audit
- Document the surgical approach by name (e.g., Henry anterior approach, Thompson posterior approach) — notes that say 'standard approach' invite auditor queries
- Include preoperative imaging interpretation (X-ray, CT if obtained) confirming radial shaft fracture location and displacement
- Record neurovascular status of the forearm and hand pre- and post-reduction, including assessment of the PIN (posterior interosseous nerve)
- Document laterality (left vs. right) to support LT/RT modifier assignment on the claim
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 25515 covers open treatment of a radial shaft fracture — the radius is surgically exposed, fragments are reduced to anatomical alignment, and internal fixation hardware (typically a plate and screws) is applied when indicated. The code includes internal fixation when performed, meaning you don't need a separate fixation code if plating is done through the same open approach.
This is an isolated radial shaft code. If the patient has a Galeazzi fracture-dislocation — radial shaft fracture plus distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) dislocation — the correct code shifts based on how the DRUJ was managed: 25525 for open radial treatment plus closed DRUJ treatment, or 25526 when the DRUJ is also opened and the TFCC is repaired. Don't default to 25515 on Galeazzi patterns without querying whether the DRUJ was addressed; that's where undercoding and audit exposure collide.
The 90-day global period applies. All routine post-op visits, hardware checks, and wound care through day 90 are bundled. Unrelated E/M services in that window require modifier 24. If a same-day significant E/M preceded the operative decision, append modifier 57 to the E/M, not modifier 25.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (8.58) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (18.98) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 8.58 |
| Practice expense RVU | 8.66 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.74 |
| Total RVU | 18.98 |
| Medicare national rate | $633.95 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $633.95 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $4,654.59 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 25515 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Upcoding to 25525 or 25526 flagged when operative note doesn't document DRUJ dislocation or its treatment — or downcoding to 25515 when DRUJ was managed but not captured
- Missing laterality modifier (LT or RT) causing claim rejection at payer edit level
- Billing a separate fixation code alongside 25515 when internal fixation is already bundled into the procedure
- Post-op E/M visits billed without modifier 24 during the 90-day global period, triggering automatic denial
- Insufficient documentation of open approach — claims audited when the note lacks a clear description of surgical exposure and fracture visualization
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01When does a radial shaft fracture become a Galeazzi and require a different code?
02Is internal fixation separately billable when plating is performed through the open approach?
03Can I bill both 25515 and 25545 (open ulnar shaft) if both bones are fractured?
04What modifier do I use for an E/M visit the day I decide to take the patient to surgery?
05Does the 90-day global include hardware removal if needed?
06Which laterality modifier is required?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02abos.orghttps://www.abos.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/sports-cpt-updated.pdf
- 03aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/discuss/threads/radial-shaft-fracture-w--galeazzi-variant-cpt-25515-25525-galeazzi-radial-shaft-fracture.176932/
- 04vsac.nlm.nih.govhttps://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/context/cs/codesystem/CPT/version/2024/code/25515/info
- 05fastrvu.comhttps://fastrvu.com/cpt/25515
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the surgical approach by name, fixation construct details, DRUJ status assessment, and neurovascular findings from the operative dictation — and flags the note if DRUJ dislocation language appears without a corresponding code selection prompt. That prevents the most common 25515-vs-25525 undercoding pattern and gives the operative note the specificity auditors require.
See how Mira captures CPT 25515 documentation