Surgical removal of a deeply embedded foreign body from the forearm requiring open exploration beyond simple superficial retrieval.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $408.16
- Work RVU
- 5.18
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Wrist
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Operative note must identify the depth of dissection — subcutaneous, fascial, or intramuscular — not just 'deep' removal
- Describe the foreign body by type and size (e.g., metal fragment, glass shard, retained suture hardware) and exact anatomical location within the forearm
- Preoperative imaging (X-ray, fluoroscopy, or ultrasound) identifying the foreign body's location should be referenced in the note
- Document any neurovascular structures encountered or protected during dissection, especially given proximity to radial and ulnar vessels and nerves
- If the foreign body was not retrieved, document the full exploration and negative finding explicitly — do not leave this implied
- Laterality must be specified (left vs. right) to support LT or RT modifier assignment
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 25248 covers open surgical removal of a foreign body lodged deep within the forearm — think retained hardware fragments, shrapnel, glass, or industrial debris that cannot be retrieved at the bedside or through simple incision. The depth and dissection required distinguish this from superficial foreign body removal codes; expect documented exploration through subcutaneous tissue, fascia, or muscle to reach the object.
This code carries a 90-day global period. All routine follow-up care — wound checks, suture removal, dressing changes — is bundled through day 90. Any unrelated evaluation during that window requires modifier 24 on the E/M code. If you're billing a decision-for-surgery visit the day before or day of the procedure, append modifier 57 to that E/M.
If the surgeon explores the forearm but does not locate or retrieve a foreign body, 25248 is not supportable as billed. Some coders append modifier 52 in that scenario; document the full exploration attempt and the negative finding explicitly in the operative note. Imaging confirmation of the foreign body's presence before surgery strengthens medical necessity and reduces audit exposure.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (5.18) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (12.22) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 5.18 |
| Practice expense RVU | 5.92 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.12 |
| Total RVU | 12.22 |
| Medicare national rate | $408.16 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $408.16 |
HOPD (APC 5112) Hospital outpatient department | $1,642.82 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $872.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 25248 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Lack of imaging documentation to confirm preoperative foreign body presence, flagging medical necessity
- Operative note describes only superficial retrieval without documentation of depth of dissection, suggesting a lower-complexity code was more appropriate
- Modifier 52 omitted when exploration was performed but the foreign body was not found or removed
- Missing laterality modifier (LT or RT) causing claim edits or rejection on facility and payer claims
- Global period conflicts when post-op E/M visits are billed without modifier 24 for unrelated conditions within the 90-day window
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What separates 25248 from a simple superficial foreign body removal?
02Can I bill 25248 if we explored but didn't find the foreign body?
03Is intraoperative fluoroscopy billable separately with 25248?
04What modifiers apply if I perform 25248 during the global period of a prior forearm procedure?
05Does the 90-day global period affect billing if the patient returns for a wound complication?
06Should I use LT or RT with 25248?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/ncci-medicaid/medicaid-ncci-policy-manual
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2026-medicaid-ncci-introduction-policy-manual.pdf
- 04aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/coding-and-reimbursement/resident-guide/resident-guide_modifiers.pdf
- 05aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/25248
- 06aoassn.orghttps://www.aoassn.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/CodingTTP.pdf
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the depth of dissection, the anatomical layer reached (subcutaneous, fascial, intramuscular), a description of the foreign body retrieved including material and size, any neurovascular structures encountered, and the confirmed laterality — all from the surgeon's dictation. This prevents the most common audit flag on 25248: an operative note that documents an incision without establishing that dissection was deep enough to support the code, or that fails to document the retrieved object itself.
See how Mira captures CPT 25248 documentation