Open surgical division of a single tendon and associated muscle in the shoulder area, typically performed to relieve tension, correct painful conditions, or address congenital or acquired structural problems.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $574.50
- Work RVU
- 8.33
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Shoulder
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 7 cited references ↓
- Specify the tendon divided by name (e.g., long head of biceps, subscapularis) — 'single tendon' alone is insufficient for audit purposes
- Document the clinical indication: congenital vs. acquired condition, prior conservative treatment tried, functional deficit or pain level driving surgical decision
- Confirm open approach with skin incision description; distinguish from percutaneous or arthroscopic technique, which maps to different codes
- If performed alongside an arthroscopic procedure, document why the tenotomy was a separate, distinct service not encompassed by any debridement performed
- Record intraoperative findings confirming pathology of the divided tendon and muscle, not just the pre-op diagnosis
- Note laterality explicitly (left vs. right shoulder) to support LT/RT modifier assignment
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓
CPT 23405 describes an open tenotomy of the shoulder in which the surgeon incises or divides a single tendon — most commonly the biceps long head — through a skin incision to correct painful or dysfunctional shoulder conditions. The procedure addresses congenital deformities, acquired contractures, or degenerative pathology by releasing tensioned soft tissue. It is distinct from arthroscopic biceps tenotomy (reported under 29822/29823) and from biceps tenodesis (23430 open, 29828 arthroscopic).
A critical coding distinction: when arthroscopic debridement is performed and the biceps tendon is tenotomized as part of that debridement, CPT Assistant (September 2012) instructs coders to report only the debridement code based on extent of service — not 23405 separately. If you're billing 23405 alongside an arthroscopic shoulder code, document clearly that the tenotomy was a distinct, separately indicated procedure not subsumed by the debridement.
23405 carries a 90-day global period. All routine post-op visits, wound checks, and dressing changes through day 90 are bundled. Billing a separately identifiable E/M during the global window requires modifier 24. If a related unplanned return to the OR is needed during the global, append modifier 78. An unrelated procedure in the same global window uses modifier 79.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (8.33) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (17.2) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 8.33 |
| Practice expense RVU | 7.31 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.56 |
| Total RVU | 17.2 |
| Medicare national rate | $574.50 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $574.50 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,695.53 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 23405 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Bundling denial when billed same-day as arthroscopic shoulder debridement (29822/29823) without documentation that the tenotomy was a distinct, separately indicated service
- Missing or incorrect laterality modifier — payers increasingly require LT or RT for unilateral shoulder procedures
- Modifier 59 appended without supporting documentation that the tenotomy was performed at a separate anatomic site or distinct encounter from a bundled procedure
- Global period conflict — post-op E/M claims submitted without modifier 24, triggering automatic denial as included in the 90-day global
- Percutaneous approach documented in the operative note, which does not support the open tenotomy code; auditors flag the mismatch and may redirect to an unlisted code
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓
01Can I bill 23405 alongside an arthroscopic shoulder debridement on the same day?
02What is the difference between 23405 and 29822/29823 for biceps tenotomy?
03When does a percutaneous shoulder tenotomy get billed as 23405 with modifier 52?
04Does the 90-day global on 23405 bundle the pre-op visit?
05How do I bill if the same tenotomy needs to be repeated during the 90-day global?
06Is 23405 ever billed bilaterally?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 03aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/23405
- 04mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/23405
- 05events.simplifycompliance.comhttps://events.simplifycompliance.com/app/uploads/2022/08/Course-Materials_Kirby.pdf
- 06cgsmedicare.comhttps://www.cgsmedicare.com/medicare_dynamic/j15/partb/ptpb/ptp.aspx
- 07cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits/medicare-ncci-faq-library
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the tendon name, surgical approach (open vs. percutaneous), laterality, intraoperative findings, and the clinical indication driving the tenotomy decision — all from dictation. That structured capture prevents the most common 23405 audit flag: operative notes that document a tenotomy during an arthroscopic case without explicitly distinguishing it from the debridement, which triggers bundling denials.
See how Mira captures CPT 23405 documentation