Closed treatment of a mandibular fracture without manipulation — no surgical reduction or repositioning of fracture fragments performed.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $597.88
- Work RVU
- 3.62
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Other
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Imaging (X-ray, CT, or panoramic radiograph) confirming mandibular fracture with fracture location specified
- Explicit statement that no manipulation was performed and clinical rationale for non-manipulative treatment
- Description of any immobilization or stabilization applied (e.g., arch bars, elastic bands, soft diet instruction) at the time of service
- ICD-10-CM fracture code from category S02 specifying fracture site, laterality, and encounter type (initial vs. subsequent)
- Notation of associated injuries or complicating factors that influenced treatment decisions
- Patient's occlusal status documented pre- and post-treatment to justify conservative approach
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 21450 covers closed (non-operative) management of a mandibular fracture where the fracture fragments are left in their current position without any manual or mechanical manipulation. No incision is made, and no hardware is placed. The code sits within the 21450–21470 mandible fracture range; if manipulation is required, step up to 21451. If open treatment is needed, use codes in the 21452–21470 range depending on fixation method.
The 90-day global period applies. That window covers all routine post-fracture management visits, wire checks, dressing changes, and removal of any temporary fixation placed at the time of service. Bill unrelated E/M visits during the global with modifier 24. If a complication requires a return to treat the same fracture — wiring that loosens or displacement that demands intervention — modifier 78 applies. A new, unrelated surgical problem in the global period uses modifier 79.
When multiple facial fractures are present in the same operative session, report each separately to the extent NCCI edits allow. If a modifier cannot override a bundling edit, bill the highest-RVU fracture code and append modifier 22 with a supporting narrative documenting the additional work. Some payers apply bilateral modifier 50 rules differently for mandible fractures — verify eligibility before appending 50.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (3.62) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (17.9) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 3.62 |
| Practice expense RVU | 13.87 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.41 |
| Total RVU | 17.9 |
| Medicare national rate | $597.88 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $597.88 |
HOPD (APC 5162) Hospital outpatient department | $551.01 |
ASC (PI G2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $295.47 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 21450 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Missing or inadequate imaging documentation to confirm fracture diagnosis at the time of treatment
- Claim submitted without manipulation specified, triggering down-code or denial when payer cannot distinguish 21450 from 21451
- Bundling denial when 21450 is billed with other facial fracture codes in the same session without modifier 59 or XS and supporting clinical documentation
- Routine post-op visits billed separately during the 90-day global period without modifier 24 to indicate unrelated service
- ICD-10 fracture code missing laterality or encounter type, causing medical necessity edit failure
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01What distinguishes 21450 from 21451?
02Does 21450 carry a global period, and what does it cover?
03Can 21450 be billed with other facial fracture codes on the same date?
04When is modifier 22 appropriate with 21450?
05What ICD-10-CM codes pair with 21450?
06Is modifier 78 or 79 correct if the patient returns during the global period for additional fracture care?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aaoms.orghttps://aaoms.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Trauma_CodingPaper.pdf
- 03aaoms.orghttps://aaoms.org/publications/coding-and-billing-papers/coding-for-temporomandibular-surgery/
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits/medicare-ncci-faq-library
- 05cgsmedicare.comhttps://www.cgsmedicare.com/medicare_dynamic/j15/partb/ptpb/ptp.aspx
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the fracture site, laterality, imaging findings, and the explicit clinical decision not to manipulate fragments from the provider's dictation. It flags if the operative note lacks a statement confirming no manipulation occurred — the single most common reason 21450 is challenged on audit or confused with 21451. It also records any immobilization technique applied, which supports medical necessity and distinguishes this encounter from a routine E/M visit during a global period.
See how Mira captures CPT 21450 documentation