Closed treatment of a nasomaxillary complex (Le Fort II pattern) fracture, with application of an external splint or fixation device to stabilize the nasal and upper jaw bones without open surgical exposure.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $799.28
- Total RVUs
- 23.93
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Other
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Imaging (CT or plain film) confirming nasomaxillary complex fracture pattern and displacement
- Operative note specifying the fracture pattern as nasomaxillary (Le Fort II type), not isolated nasal or malar
- Description of the closed reduction technique and the specific stabilization device applied (e.g., external splint, arch bars, intermaxillary fixation)
- Documentation of pre- and post-reduction alignment and any complications encountered during the procedure
- If modifier 22 is appended, a written narrative quantifying additional time, complexity, or intensity compared to a routine closed nasomaxillary reduction
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 21345 covers closed reduction and external stabilization of a nasomaxillary complex fracture — the pattern involving both the nasal bones and the maxilla, corresponding to the Le Fort II fracture zone. No incision is made; the surgeon manipulates the fragments into alignment and applies a splint, arch bar, or other fixation device to hold the reduction while healing occurs. This is distinct from open treatment codes (21346, 21347, 21348), which require surgical exposure of the fracture site.
The 90-day global period covers the procedure, the day-before visit if applicable, and all routine post-op management through day 90. Any E/M service during that window for an unrelated problem requires modifier 24; a separately identifiable E/M on the same day as the procedure requires modifier 25. Payers scrutinize these heavily — document medical necessity for each encounter explicitly.
When multiple facial fractures are treated at the same session, check NCCI procedure-to-procedure edits before billing 21345 alongside adjacent fracture codes (e.g., nasal fracture codes 21315–21337 or nasoethmoid codes 21338–21340). Where a modifier-59 bypass is not permitted, consider appending modifier 22 with a written narrative describing the additional complexity, time, and intensity involved.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 8.83 |
| Practice expense RVU | 13.81 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.29 |
| Total RVU | 23.93 |
| Medicare national rate | $799.28 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $799.28 |
HOPD (APC 5163) Hospital outpatient department | $1,585.19 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $659.17 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 21345 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Fracture pattern not specified — claim coded as nasomaxillary (21345) but operative note only documents nasal fracture, triggering down-code to 21315–21325 range
- Bundling denial when 21345 is billed same-session with nasal or nasoethmoid fracture codes without a valid modifier or NCCI edit bypass
- E/M billed during the 90-day global period without modifier 24 or 25, causing automatic bundling by payer
- Lack of imaging documentation to confirm displaced nasomaxillary fracture requiring active reduction, prompting medical necessity denial
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01What distinguishes 21345 from the nasal fracture codes 21315–21325?
02Can 21345 and a nasal fracture code be billed together on the same date?
03What is the global period for 21345, and what does it include?
04When is modifier 22 appropriate for 21345?
05Is 21345 payable in an ASC setting?
06How does modifier 52 apply to 21345 in a bilateral fracture scenario?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aaoms.orghttps://aaoms.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Trauma_CodingPaper.pdf
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/medicare-ncci-correspondence-language-manual-02282026.pdf
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/21345
- 05cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/r12052cp.pdf
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the fracture pattern (nasomaxillary complex, Le Fort II distribution), reduction technique, and the specific fixation device applied from surgeon dictation — preventing the most common audit flag: an operative note that documents 'nasal fracture' without establishing nasomaxillary involvement, which forces a down-code and triggers a medical necessity denial.
See how Mira captures CPT 21345 documentation