Open surgical treatment of a nasoethmoid fracture with internal fixation
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $700.08
- Work RVU
- 8.29
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Other
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Preoperative imaging (CT facial bones) confirming nasoethmoid fracture pattern and displacement
- Operative note specifying open approach, structures exposed, and method of fixation (plates, screws, transnasal wires)
- Documentation of intercanthal distance measurement and reduction achieved — critical for medial canthal tendon involvement
- Identification of any concomitant injuries addressed (orbital wall, frontal sinus, NOE complex bilaterality) with separate descriptions of each repair
- Surgeon attestation of medical necessity for open over closed approach, citing fracture displacement, comminution, or failed closed reduction
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 21339 describes open repair of a nasoethmoid fracture with fixation. The nasoethmoid complex — the junction of the nasal bones, ethmoid, and medial orbital walls — is notoriously difficult to restore given the forces required to fracture it and the precision needed to re-establish intercanthal distance and nasal projection. Open access is required when closed reduction cannot achieve or maintain adequate reduction, or when comminution demands direct visualization and rigid fixation with plates, screws, or wires.
This code carries a 90-day global period. Routine post-op visits, wound checks, and hardware monitoring within that window are bundled — bill them separately only with modifier 24 (unrelated E/M) or 79 (unrelated procedure). The 90-day global also means the pre-operative visit the day before surgery is included unless the decision for surgery was made at that encounter, in which case modifier 57 applies to that E/M.
Nasoethmoid fractures frequently occur alongside other midface, orbital, or frontal sinus injuries. When separate, distinctly documented procedures are performed on anatomically distinct structures at the same operative session, modifier 59 or the appropriate X modifier can unlock separate payment — but the operative note must explicitly identify each injury and each repair as independent work, not just components of a single exposure.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (8.29) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (20.96) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 8.29 |
| Practice expense RVU | 11.46 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.21 |
| Total RVU | 20.96 |
| Medicare national rate | $700.08 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $700.08 |
HOPD (APC 5165) Hospital outpatient department | $6,048.05 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,025.62 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 21339 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Operative note fails to distinguish open fixation work from any concurrent closed or soft-tissue procedures, triggering bundling
- Missing or inadequate CT imaging documentation in the record at time of audit
- Modifier 59 or XS applied to same-session facial fracture codes without distinct procedure documentation supporting separate work
- Global period billing conflict when post-op visits are submitted without modifier 24 or 79 within the 90-day window
- Payer downcodes to a less complex facial fracture repair code when the operative note lacks specificity about the nasoethmoid complex and fixation method
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01Can 21339 be billed with orbital fracture repair codes on the same day?
02What modifier applies when the decision for this surgery was made at the same-day E/M visit?
03Is 21339 appropriate for bilateral nasoethmoid fractures, and does modifier 50 apply?
04What ICD-10 codes are typically paired with 21339?
05If hardware removal is needed after the 90-day global, what code applies?
06Does the site of service affect payment for 21339?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2026-ncci-medicaid-policy-manual.pdf
- 03cgsmedicare.comhttps://www.cgsmedicare.com/medicare_dynamic/j15/partb/ptpb/ptp.aspx
- 04emedny.orghttps://www.emedny.org/providermanuals/physician/pdfs/physician%20procedure%20codes%20sect5.pdf
- 05aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/quality/coding-and-reimbursement/
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the approach, fixation hardware type and placement sites, intercanthal measurements pre- and post-reduction, and each anatomical structure individually addressed. This prevents the most common audit flag for 21339: an operative note that describes a single midface exposure without differentiating the nasoethmoid repair from any concurrent orbital or frontal sinus work, which invites bundling denials on multi-structure cases.
See how Mira captures CPT 21339 documentation