Radical resection of a soft tissue tumor of the face or scalp measuring less than 2 cm, performed with wide margins consistent with malignant or suspected malignant disease.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $639.63
- Work RVU
- 9.64
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Other
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Preoperative note documenting clinical suspicion of malignancy or confirmed sarcoma diagnosis justifying radical resection rather than simple excision
- Operative report specifying tumor location on face or scalp, measured size confirmed intraoperatively as less than 2 cm
- Description of resection margins and extent of tissue removed to support 'radical' characterization distinct from shave or simple excision
- Pathology report or pending pathology order linked to the operative encounter to substantiate malignancy indication
- Documentation of any involvement of adjacent structures, nerve preservation, or reconstructive steps performed in the same session
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 21015 describes a radical resection — not a simple excision — of a soft tissue tumor (e.g., sarcoma) located on the face or scalp when the lesion is under 2 cm. Radical resection implies wide-margin removal designed to address known or suspected malignancy, distinguishing this code from benign excision codes. The approach requires removal of the tumor along with a surrounding cuff of normal tissue to reduce local recurrence risk.
The 90-day global period covers the operative session, the day-before visit, and all routine postoperative care through day 90. Any separately identifiable E/M on the day of surgery requires modifier 25. Unplanned return to the OR for a related complication during the global window requires modifier 78; an unrelated procedure in that same window requires modifier 79.
This code is most frequently billed by general surgery and plastic and reconstructive surgery, with ophthalmology appearing in CMS utilization data for periorbital lesions. Place of service matters: HOPD and ASC reimbursement differ significantly — see the Site of Service comparison on this page. Payer-side, the key documentation battle is establishing medical necessity for radical (rather than simple) resection, which hinges on pathology suspicion documented preoperatively.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (9.64) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (19.15) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 9.64 |
| Practice expense RVU | 7.82 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.69 |
| Total RVU | 19.15 |
| Medicare national rate | $639.63 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $639.63 |
HOPD (APC 5073) Hospital outpatient department | $2,967.63 |
ASC (PI G2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $1,248.36 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 21015 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Operative note uses generic language like 'excision of lesion' without explicitly describing radical wide-margin resection technique or malignancy rationale
- Size not documented intraoperatively — relying solely on imaging measurement without confirming surgical specimen size
- Bundling denial when closure or reconstruction coded separately without supporting documentation that the repair was distinct and beyond routine wound closure
- Lack of pathology or biopsy documentation to justify radical approach over a benign-excision code, triggering medical necessity denial
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What separates CPT 21015 from a standard excision code like 11640–11646?
02Does the 90-day global include postoperative wound checks and suture removal?
03Can CPT 21015 and a reconstructive flap code be billed together on the same day?
04When is modifier 22 appropriate with 21015?
05Is a bilateral modifier applicable for face or scalp tumors?
06What ICD-10 diagnoses support medical necessity for CPT 21015?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2025nccimedicarepolicymanualcompletepdf.pdf
- 03mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/21015
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/21015
- 05findacode.comhttps://www.findacode.com/cpt/21015-cpt-code.html
- 06payerprice.comhttps://payerprice.com/rates/21015-CPT-fee-schedule
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the surgeon's dictated tumor size, anatomic location on the face or scalp, resection margin intent, and the clinical basis for radical rather than simple excision. It flags if the operative note omits the word 'radical' or fails to document preoperative malignancy suspicion — the two most common triggers for downcoding to a benign excision code on audit.
See how Mira captures CPT 21015 documentation