Radiologic examination of both knees in the standing, weight-bearing anteroposterior position — a single code that covers both sides simultaneously.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $42.09
- Total RVUs
- 1.26
- Global, days
- Region
- Knee
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Physician order must specify bilateral standing anteroposterior views — not just 'knee X-ray'
- Medical necessity documented for imaging both knees, not just the symptomatic side
- Radiology report must confirm weight-bearing (standing) position was used for the AP projection
- If billed alongside a unilateral knee X-ray code, separate clinical indication for each side must be documented
- Ordering diagnosis must link to both knees when 73565 is the sole code billed
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
73565 is the correct code when a standing anteroposterior view is taken of both knees on a single film. The weight-bearing position is the defining clinical feature: it loads the joint and reveals compartment narrowing that non-weight-bearing views miss. Because the code descriptor inherently covers both knees, no LT/RT or modifier 50 is required.
Code selection within the knee X-ray family hinges on view count and laterality. 73565 is appropriate only when the standing AP is the sole study ordered — or when there is documented medical necessity to image both knees. If the standing AP is added to a unilateral multi-view study, it becomes an additional view that rolls into 73560, 73562, or 73564 depending on total view count. If the right knee is being imaged only for comparison with a symptomatic left knee, do not bill 73565; bill only the symptomatic side.
73565 has four documented NCCI bundling edit pairs. The most commonly triggered edit occurs when 73565 is billed same-day with 73562 or 73564 for the same encounter without a modifier establishing a distinct clinical reason. Run your claim through an NCCI scrubber before submission. When separate medical necessity exists for both a multi-view unilateral study and bilateral standing views, modifier 59 or XS on the lower-column code supports the distinct service.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 0.16 |
| Practice expense RVU | 1.08 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.02 |
| Total RVU | 1.26 |
| Medicare national rate | $42.09 |
| Global period | days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $42.09 |
HOPD (APC 5521) Hospital outpatient department | $88.91 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 73565 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Bilateral code billed when only the symptomatic side had documented medical necessity — comparison views do not support 73565
- 73565 billed same-day with 73562 or 73564 without a modifier, triggering NCCI bundling edit
- Modifier 50 or LT/RT appended unnecessarily — 73565 already describes both knees and does not require anatomical modifiers
- Missing or non-specific radiology order (e.g., 'knee X-ray') when a standing bilateral view requires explicit physician direction
- ICD-10 diagnosis code reflects unilateral pathology only, creating a mismatch with a bilateral imaging code
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01Do I append modifier 50, LT, or RT to 73565?
02Can I bill 73565 and 73564 together for the same encounter?
03The physician ordered the right knee and added the left for comparison. Can I bill 73565?
04When is the standing AP view counted as an additional view rather than billed as 73565?
05Which modifier splits the technical and professional components of 73565?
06What ICD-10 codes most commonly support 73565 medical necessity?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/blog/23854-coding-diagnostic-views-of-the-knee/
- 03aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/discuss/threads/bilateral-diagnostic-x-rays-billing.165765/
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/discuss/threads/billing-multiple-views-in-knee-x-rays-73560-73562-73564-73565.190474/
- 05gomedicalbilling.comhttps://gomedicalbilling.com/codes/cpt/73565
- 06cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the standing weight-bearing position, bilateral clinical indication, and ordering diagnosis from dictation — then flags when the note documents symptoms in only one knee, preventing a 73565 claim that will deny for lack of bilateral medical necessity. It also detects same-day unilateral knee X-ray codes and prompts the biller to confirm whether an NCCI modifier is needed before submission.
See how Mira captures CPT 73565 documentation