Percutaneous skeletal fixation of a metatarsophalangeal joint dislocation, performed with manipulation
Verified May 8, 2026 · 4 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $388.12
- Work RVU
- 2.7
- Global, days
- 10
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 4 cited references ↓
- Confirm the joint level: specify which metatarsophalangeal joint(s) were dislocated and treated
- Document that manipulation (closed reduction) was performed prior to or concurrent with fixation
- Record that percutaneous skeletal fixation was placed — include hardware type, size, and number of pins
- Describe fluoroscopic or imaging confirmation of reduction and hardware position intraoperatively
- Note laterality explicitly (left, right, or bilateral) in the operative report header and body
- Include the mechanism of injury or clinical indication supporting the dislocation diagnosis
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 4 cited references ↓
CPT 28636 covers the closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation of a dislocated metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint in the foot. The procedure involves manipulating the dislocated joint back into anatomical alignment and then stabilizing it with percutaneous skeletal fixation — typically K-wires placed through the skin without a formal open incision. Fluoroscopic guidance is typically used to confirm reduction and hardware placement, though fluoroscopy is generally considered bundled into the procedure and not separately billable.
This code sits in the middle of a three-tier hierarchy for MTP joint dislocations: closed reduction without fixation (28630), percutaneous fixation with manipulation (28636), and open treatment with internal fixation (28645). Selecting the right code requires operative note documentation that confirms both the manipulation and the percutaneous fixation — if only manipulation was performed without hardware, 28636 is not correct. The 10-day global period means post-op visits within that window are included in the surgical payment; unrelated E/M services require modifier 24.
Bilateral MTP dislocations treated in the same session require modifier 50 or laterality modifiers LT/RT with appropriate payer-specific billing conventions. Commercial payer policies on percutaneous foot fixation vary; some require prior authorization or specific ICD-10 diagnosis pairing, particularly for non-traumatic presentations.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (2.7) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (11.62) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 2.7 |
| Practice expense RVU | 8.35 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.57 |
| Total RVU | 11.62 |
| Medicare national rate | $388.12 |
| Global period | 10 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $388.12 |
HOPD (APC 5113) Hospital outpatient department | $3,342.87 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $1,644.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 28636 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Billing 28636 when only manipulation was performed without percutaneous fixation — correct code is 28630
- Missing laterality in the claim or operative note, triggering a payer edit requiring clarification
- Unbundling fluoroscopy (77002) separately when it is considered integral to the percutaneous fixation
- Post-op E/M visit billed within the 10-day global without modifier 24 for an unrelated condition
- ICD-10 diagnosis code mismatch — using a sprain or fracture code instead of a dislocation code (e.g., S93.1xx)
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 4 cited references ↓
01What separates 28636 from 28630 and 28645?
02Can fluoroscopy be billed separately with 28636?
03How is a bilateral MTP dislocation billed in the same session?
04What global period applies to 28636, and what does it cover?
05If the reduction fails and the patient returns for open treatment within the global, how is that billed?
06Does 28636 require prior authorization for Medicare?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the joint level (which MTP joint), the manipulation technique, the percutaneous fixation details (wire type, number, placement approach), laterality, and fluoroscopic confirmation from the operative dictation. This prevents the most common 28636 denial: a note that documents reduction but omits explicit confirmation that percutaneous hardware was placed — which forces a downcode to 28630.
See how Mira captures CPT 28636 documentation