Closed (non-surgical) treatment of a fractured sesamoid bone in the foot, using immobilization and conservative management without open surgical intervention.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $123.58
- Work RVU
- 1.08
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 7 cited references ↓
- Confirm closed treatment — document that no incision or open surgical approach was performed
- Specify laterality (left vs. right foot) to match LT/RT modifier on the claim
- Imaging findings confirming sesamoid fracture (X-ray, MRI, or CT); note the imaging modality and date
- Mechanism of injury — distinguish acute traumatic fracture from stress fracture, as ICD-10 coding differs
- Immobilization method used (cast, boot, stiff-soled shoe) and weight-bearing status at time of treatment
- Clinical assessment of neurovascular status and any displacement of the fracture fragment
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓
CPT 28530 covers closed treatment of a sesamoid bone fracture in the foot. Sesamoids in the foot are most commonly found on the plantar surface of the first metatarsophalangeal joint, embedded within the flexor hallucis brevis tendons. Closed treatment means no incision — management typically involves immobilization (cast, boot, or stiff-soled shoe), offloading, and pain control. The companion code 28531 covers open treatment with or without internal fixation when closed management is insufficient.
The 90-day global period is the critical billing context here. Any routine follow-up, cast changes, or x-ray interpretation bundled with the visit during that window is included in the 28530 payment. If a separate, unrelated condition is managed during the global period, append modifier 24 to the E/M. If the patient returns for a related complication requiring a return procedure, use modifier 78. An unrelated procedure in the same global window takes modifier 79.
Diagnosis coding must be specific: laterality matters and payers frequently reject claims where the ICD-10 code doesn't match the LT/RT modifier. The most common ICD-10 code pairing is S92.811_ or S92.812_ (fracture of medial or lateral sesamoid of hallux), with the appropriate laterality character. Stress fractures of the sesamoid (M84.37_) code differently from acute traumatic fractures — confirm mechanism of injury in the note.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (1.08) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (3.7) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 1.08 |
| Practice expense RVU | 2.5 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.12 |
| Total RVU | 3.7 |
| Medicare national rate | $123.58 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $123.58 |
HOPD (APC 5111) Hospital outpatient department | $252.01 |
ASC (PI P3) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $83.92 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 28530 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Laterality mismatch — LT/RT modifier on the claim conflicts with the ICD-10 laterality character
- ICD-10 specificity failure — using an unspecified sesamoid fracture code when a specific code for medial or lateral sesamoid is available
- Stress fracture vs. acute fracture miscoding — M84.37_ and S92.8_ are not interchangeable; payers audit mechanism-of-injury documentation
- Routine follow-up visits billed separately during the 90-day global period without modifier 24 or 25
- Missing or inadequate imaging documentation to support the fracture diagnosis at time of initial treatment
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓
01Does 28530 include the initial X-ray interpretation?
02Can I bill 28530 and 28531 together for the same sesamoid?
03What if both sesamoids on the same foot are fractured?
04How do I bill if a patient in the 90-day global comes in for an unrelated sprained ankle?
05When would modifier 22 apply to 28530?
06Is 28530 typically performed in the office, ED, or ASC?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/28530
- 03mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/28530
- 04findacode.comhttps://www.findacode.com/cpt/28530-cpt-code.html
- 05emedny.orghttps://www.emedny.org/providermanuals/physician/pdfs/physician%20procedure%20codes%20sect5-2008-1.pdf
- 06aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/coding-and-reimbursement/resident-guide/resident-guide_modifiers.pdf
- 07genhealth.aihttps://genhealth.ai/code/cpt4/28530-closed-treatment-of-sesamoid-fracture
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the fracture site (medial vs. lateral sesamoid), confirmed foot laterality, imaging modality and findings, mechanism of injury (acute trauma vs. repetitive stress), immobilization type applied, and weight-bearing instructions given. This prevents the two most common denials for 28530: a laterality mismatch between the ICD-10 code and LT/RT modifier, and an acute-vs-stress fracture miscoding that fails payer clinical edits.
See how Mira captures CPT 28530 documentation