Below-knee amputation performed using an open, circular (guillotine) technique through the tibia and fibula, without creation of a skin flap.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $552.45
- Work RVU
- 9.55
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Explicit statement of the open, circular (guillotine) technique — not just 'below-knee amputation'
- Clinical justification for emergent approach: document ascending infection/necrosis trajectory or hemodynamic instability that precluded flap closure
- Anatomic level of transection through tibia and fibula with laterality (right vs. left)
- Intraoperative findings including extent of tissue necrosis, vascular compromise, or contamination driving technique selection
- Post-operative wound status and plan for subsequent closure or revision, including anticipated follow-up procedure
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 27882 describes a guillotine-style transtibial amputation — an open, circular transection through both the tibia and fibula with no skin flap closure. This technique is chosen specifically for emergent situations: rapidly ascending infection or necrosis, or hemodynamic instability where a definitive flap closure would be unsafe. The open wound is managed post-operatively and typically requires a subsequent closure or revision procedure (see 27884 for secondary closure/scar revision).
Because 27882 is a distinctly different technique from the standard transtibial amputation (27880) or the immediate-fit cast variant (27881), the operative note must make the emergent rationale and open circular technique explicit. Auditors and payers will scrutinize whether the guillotine approach was clinically justified versus simply underdocumented flap closure. The 90-day global period applies, covering all routine post-op care through day 90.
Side-specific modifiers (LT/RT) are required for correct laterality reporting. Modifier 50 applies only if bilateral guillotine amputations are performed at the same session — a rare clinical scenario. Any return to the OR within the global for wound revision or definitive closure related to this amputation uses modifier 78; unrelated procedures in the same window use modifier 79.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (9.55) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (16.54) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 9.55 |
| Practice expense RVU | 4.61 |
| Malpractice RVU | 2.38 |
| Total RVU | 16.54 |
| Medicare national rate | $552.45 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $552.45 |
HOPD (APC 5113) Hospital outpatient department | $3,342.87 |
ASC (PI G2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $1,644.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 27882 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Operative note documents 'amputation below knee' without specifying open circular/guillotine technique, triggering down-code to 27880
- Missing or insufficient clinical justification for emergent guillotine approach — payer treats as incomplete documentation
- Laterality modifier (LT or RT) absent, causing claim rejection or pend for bilateral clarification
- Subsequent closure or revision billed without modifier 78 during the 90-day global period, denied as included service
- ICD-10 diagnosis code does not support emergent vascular or infectious indication, creating medical necessity mismatch
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01What makes 27882 different from 27880?
02When is the guillotine technique clinically appropriate to bill?
03Do I need a separate code for the subsequent wound closure?
04Is modifier 50 appropriate for 27882?
05What global period applies to 27882, and what does it include?
06Which ICD-10 diagnosis codes support 27882?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/27882
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits/medicare-ncci-policy-manual
- 04emedny.orghttps://www.emedny.org/providermanuals/physician/pdfs/physician%20procedure%20codes%20sect5.pdf
- 05axogeninc.comhttps://www.axogeninc.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025-Neurectomy-Post-Amputation-Coding-Guide.pdf
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the operative technique by name (open circular/guillotine), the emergent clinical indication (ascending necrosis, sepsis, hemodynamic instability), transection level, and laterality directly from dictation. That prevents the most common audit flag — an operative note that documents a below-knee amputation without distinguishing the guillotine approach from a standard flap closure, which drives down-coding to 27880 and triggers medical necessity denials.
See how Mira captures CPT 27882 documentation