Closed treatment of a posterior malleolus fracture with manipulation to restore anatomic alignment, performed without surgical incision.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $442.23
- Work RVU
- 5.01
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Confirm fracture involves the posterior malleolus specifically — not just a general ankle fracture description
- Document that manipulation was performed and describe the technique used to achieve reduction
- Pre- and post-manipulation imaging (X-ray) confirming fragment displacement and post-reduction alignment
- Immobilization type and application detail (cast, splint, boot) applied after reduction
- Neurovascular status of the extremity before and after manipulation
- If other malleolar fractures are also treated, document each fracture site and treatment separately in the operative note
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 27768 covers closed (non-incisional) reduction of a posterior malleolus fracture requiring manual manipulation to correct fragment displacement. The posterior malleolus — the back lip of the tibia at the ankle mortise — is a distinct fracture component that must be documented separately from fibular or medial malleolus injuries billed under other codes. Manipulation means the provider physically corrected the fracture alignment; if no manipulation was performed, a lower-level closed-treatment code applies.
The code carries a 90-day global period. All routine post-op visits, cast checks, and immobilization management are bundled from the day before surgery through day 90. Do not separately bill casting or strapping codes (e.g., 29581) for the same ankle on the same date — NCCI policy bundles them explicitly when any musculoskeletal procedure code from the 20100–28899 range is reported for the same anatomic area.
Side-specific modifiers LT and RT are expected on every claim. Bilateral posterior malleolus fractures are rare but would require modifier 50 or separate line items per payer rules. If additional malleolar fractures (medial, lateral) are treated at the same encounter, check current NCCI PTP edits before reporting companion codes — some combinations require modifier 59 or XS to override bundling when the anatomic site distinction is documentable.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (5.01) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (13.24) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 5.01 |
| Practice expense RVU | 7.16 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.07 |
| Total RVU | 13.24 |
| Medicare national rate | $442.23 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $442.23 |
HOPD (APC 5112) Hospital outpatient department | $1,642.82 |
ASC (PI G2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $872.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 27768 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Casting or strapping code billed same-day for the same ankle — bundled under NCCI policy and not separately payable
- Missing side modifier (LT or RT) causing claim rejection or returned-to-provider status
- Documentation describes only a general ankle fracture without specifying the posterior malleolus as the treated structure
- No manipulation documented — if reduction was not performed, 27768 does not apply and a lower-level code is required
- Post-op services billed within the 90-day global period without modifier 24 for unrelated E/M visits
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01Can I bill a casting code alongside 27768?
02What is the global period for 27768?
03When is modifier 22 appropriate for this code?
04How does 27768 differ from closed treatment codes for medial or lateral malleolus fractures?
05Is a separate E/M billable on the same day as 27768 in a clinic setting?
06What modifier is needed if the patient returns to the OR during the global period for a related complication?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2025nccimedicarepolicymanualcompletepdf.pdf
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits/medicare-ncci-policy-manual
- 04bedrockbilling.comhttps://bedrockbilling.com/static/cci/27768
- 05findacode.comhttps://www.findacode.com/cpt/27768-cpt-code.html
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the fracture site (posterior malleolus), the manipulation technique, pre- and post-reduction alignment findings from imaging, and the immobilization method applied — everything needed to defend 27768 over a no-manipulation code and to satisfy MAC documentation requirements. Missing manipulation language is the leading reason these claims are down-coded on audit.
See how Mira captures CPT 27768 documentation