Closed reduction of a distal femoral growth plate separation with manipulation, using skin or skeletal traction as needed to restore alignment in a skeletally immature patient.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $653.66
- Work RVU
- 8.89
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Knee
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Confirm skeletally immature patient — radiographic evidence of open distal femoral physis required
- Salter-Harris classification documented in the operative or procedure note
- Description of manipulation technique and whether skin or skeletal traction was applied
- Pre- and post-reduction fluoroscopic or radiographic findings confirming fracture alignment
- Operative note distinguishes closed reduction (27517) from open reduction (27519) — no ambiguity in approach language
- If assistant at surgery billed with modifier 80 or AS, operative note must name the assistant and describe active participation
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 27517 covers closed treatment of a distal femoral epiphyseal separation with manipulation — meaning the surgeon reduces the displaced growth plate fracture without opening the skin, applying skin or skeletal traction when necessary to maintain alignment. This is a pediatric injury by definition: the distal femoral physis is only present in skeletally immature patients, making age and radiographic confirmation of an open growth plate mandatory documentation elements.
The code sits in a three-code family for distal femoral epiphyseal injuries. Use 27516 when no manipulation is required. Step up to 27519 when open reduction with or without internal fixation is performed. If the fracture cannot be held with closed means and you convert to open fixation, 27519 is the correct code — don't bill 27517 and 27519 together for the same injury. The 90-day global period covers all routine follow-up, traction adjustments, and cast changes through day 90. Separate E/M visits in that window require modifier 24 with documentation of a distinct medical problem.
Growth plate injuries in children are frequently missed at initial presentation, and payers look for ICD-10 codes that specifically identify a physeal fracture (Salter-Harris classification) rather than a generic distal femur fracture code. Mismatched diagnosis coding is a leading denial trigger for 27517. Salter-Harris type should be specified in the operative note and on the claim.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (8.89) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (19.57) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 8.89 |
| Practice expense RVU | 8.78 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.9 |
| Total RVU | 19.57 |
| Medicare national rate | $653.66 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $653.66 |
HOPD (APC 5112) Hospital outpatient department | $1,642.82 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $872.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 27517 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- ICD-10 diagnosis code does not specify a physeal or growth plate injury — generic distal femur fracture codes trigger mismatch edits
- Claim submitted as 27519 (open) when documentation supports only closed reduction, or vice versa
- Post-op E/M visits billed without modifier 24 during the 90-day global period
- Patient age or radiographic findings do not support an open physis, undermining medical necessity
- Traction supplies or casting billed separately when included in the global package
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between CPT 27516, 27517, and 27519?
02Can I bill 27517 and 27519 together if I attempt closed reduction and then convert to open?
03Does 27517 carry a global period, and what does it include?
04What ICD-10 codes should I use with 27517?
05Can 27517 be billed bilaterally?
06When is modifier 22 appropriate for 27517?
07Can a PA or NP bill for assisting at surgery on 27517?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/27517
- 03findacode.comhttps://www.findacode.com/cpt/27517-cpt-code.html
- 04emedny.orghttps://www.emedny.org/providermanuals/physician/pdfs/physician%20procedure%20codes%20sect5.pdf
- 05novitas-solutions.comhttps://www.novitas-solutions.com/webcenter/portal/MedicareJL/pagebyid?contentId=00144529
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the Salter-Harris fracture type, the specific manipulation technique, whether skin or skeletal traction was applied, pre- and post-reduction alignment findings, and the patient's skeletal maturity status from the procedure dictation. That prevents the two most common denial triggers for 27517: a generic fracture diagnosis that doesn't map to a physeal injury, and an operative note that doesn't clearly distinguish closed reduction from open treatment.
See how Mira captures CPT 27517 documentation