Closed treatment of both-bone forearm fractures (radius and ulnar shaft) requiring manipulation to achieve acceptable alignment.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $623.59
- Total RVUs
- 18.67
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Wrist
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Confirm fracture involves BOTH the radial shaft and the ulnar shaft — single-bone fractures map to different codes.
- Document that manipulation (active reduction) was performed; describe technique, anesthesia/sedation used, and post-reduction alignment.
- Pre- and post-reduction radiographs with the interpreting physician's findings on alignment, angulation, and displacement.
- Type of immobilization applied (sugar-tong splint, long-arm cast, short-arm cast) and the position of immobilization.
- Patient consent notation and any complications or unusual circumstances encountered during reduction.
- For same-day E/M: document a separately identifiable medical decision beyond the fracture management itself to support modifier 25.
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 25565 covers closed (non-operative) treatment of fractures involving both the radial shaft and the ulnar shaft when manipulation is required. This distinguishes it from the without-manipulation counterpart: the treating provider must actively reduce the fracture, typically under sedation or regional block, before applying a cast or splint. Both bones must be fractured — if only the ulna is manipulated, see 25535; if only the radius, see 25600 or 25605.
The 90-day global period covers all routine follow-up visits, cast changes, and radiographic checks related to the fracture through day 90. A same-day E/M is separately billable only with modifier 25, and only if it reflects a separately identifiable, documented decision — not the fracture management itself. Return visits during the global period for unrelated problems require modifier 24.
This code is commonly billed from the emergency department or an outpatient hospital setting, which explains the site-of-service differential between HOPD and ASC payment rates. When a reduction attempt fails and an open procedure (25574 or 25575) is subsequently required, the intraoperative conversion is reported with modifier 22 or a more specific code depending on timing — do not re-report 25565 with modifier 76 unless an independent, repeated closed reduction is performed on a separate date.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 5.7 |
| Practice expense RVU | 11.66 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.31 |
| Total RVU | 18.67 |
| Medicare national rate | $623.59 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $623.59 |
HOPD (APC 5112) Hospital outpatient department | $1,642.82 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $872.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 25565 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Unbundling error: billing a same-day E/M without modifier 25 when the visit was solely for fracture evaluation and casting.
- Wrong code for single-bone fracture: ulna-only maps to 25535; radius-only distal fracture maps to 25600/25605.
- Global period violation: billing a routine follow-up visit within the 90-day global without modifier 24, flagged as duplicate or included service.
- Missing post-reduction radiograph documentation, causing payers to deny manipulation as unsupported.
- Laterality not specified: many payers require LT or RT modifier; claims with no laterality modifier are rejected or returned.
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01Can I bill 25565 twice if I had to re-manipulate the fracture on a separate visit?
02What's the difference between 25565 and 25575?
03Do I need modifier LT or RT for 25565?
04A patient returns within the 90-day global with an unrelated wrist infection. How do I bill the E/M?
05Is an assistant surgeon billable for 25565?
06Can I separately bill for the casting or splint applied after reduction?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/physician-self-referral/list-cpt-hcpcs-codes
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2025nccimedicarepolicymanualcompletepdf.pdf
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/25565
- 05findacode.comhttps://www.findacode.com/cpt/25565-cpt-code.html
- 06payerprice.comhttps://payerprice.com/rates/25565-CPT-fee-schedule
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the fracture pattern (both radial and ulnar shaft), the reduction technique used, sedation or anesthesia type, post-reduction radiographic alignment findings, and the immobilization method and position applied. That documentation package directly supports medical necessity for the manipulation and defends against the most common denial — missing evidence that an active reduction was performed.
See how Mira captures CPT 25565 documentation