Closed treatment of both-bone forearm fractures (radius and ulna shafts together) without any manual realignment of the bone fragments.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $332.00
- Work RVU
- 2.53
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Wrist
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Imaging (X-ray) confirming fractures of both the radial and ulnar shafts, with laterality documented
- Explicit statement that no manipulation (reduction) was performed
- Type of immobilization applied — splint, cast, or other device — with position of the forearm noted
- Clinical rationale for closed treatment without manipulation (e.g., acceptable alignment, patient factors)
- Laterality clearly documented — left or right forearm — matching the modifier billed
- Plan for follow-up imaging to monitor healing during the global period
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 25560 covers non-surgical management of simultaneous radial and ulnar shaft fractures where the treating physician elects not to manipulate the fracture fragments. The forearm is immobilized — typically with a cast or splint — and the fracture is allowed to heal in its current position. No reduction is attempted. This is distinct from 25565, which requires manipulation, and from 25574/25575, which are open treatment codes.
The 90-day global period means all routine follow-up visits, cast changes, and monitoring X-ray interpretations through day 90 are bundled. Any E/M service on the day of or just before the fracture care decision requires modifier 57 (since this is a major surgery global). LT or RT is required to indicate which forearm is involved. If only one bone required treatment and the other was separately addressed, code selection and documentation must reflect that distinction — 25560 is specifically for simultaneous both-bone fractures treated without manipulation.
For concurrent procedures not bundled into the fracture care — such as external fixator application for an associated open injury — append modifier 51. NCCI edits govern what can be unbundled; check the NCCI policy manual before billing adjunct codes on the same date.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (2.53) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (9.94) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 2.53 |
| Practice expense RVU | 6.9 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.51 |
| Total RVU | 9.94 |
| Medicare national rate | $332.00 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $332.00 |
HOPD (APC 5111) Hospital outpatient department | $252.01 |
ASC (PI P2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $135.54 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 25560 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Missing laterality modifier (LT or RT) required by most MACs and commercial payers
- Billing a separate E/M on the day of fracture care without modifier 57 on the E/M, triggering a global period denial
- Code mismatch — billing 25560 when documentation describes a single-bone fracture or when manipulation was actually performed (should be 25565)
- Duplicate claim or overlapping global period when a subsequent encounter is billed as a new fracture service rather than a global follow-up
- Missing or insufficient X-ray documentation to confirm both-bone shaft involvement
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between 25560 and 25565?
02Can I bill 25560 if only one bone (radius or ulna) was fractured?
03Do I need modifier LT or RT on 25560?
04What modifier goes on the E/M if the physician sees the patient and decides to treat the fracture same day?
05Can I separately bill for casting or splinting with 25560?
06What if the fracture requires an external fixator for an associated open injury?
07Is 25560 subject to SNF consolidated billing?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/physician-fee-schedule/search/overview
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/medicare-ncci-policy-manual-2024-chapter-4.pdf
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/r12052cp.pdf
- 05aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/coding-newsletters/my-orthopedic-coding-alert/surgery-remember-to-code-for-all-services-surrounding-radialulnar-fx-174437-article
- 06aaoms.orghttps://aaoms.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Trauma_CodingPaper.pdf
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the fracture laterality, both-bone involvement (radius and ulna shaft), the absence of manipulation, and the immobilization method from the physician's dictation. This prevents the most common denial scenario for 25560 — missing laterality and documentation that conflates 25560 with 25565 by vaguely describing 'fracture reduction' when none occurred.
See how Mira captures CPT 25560 documentation