Closed treatment of a supracondylar or transcondylar humeral fracture, with or without intercondylar extension, performed without manipulation.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $434.21
- Work RVU
- 3.6
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Elbow
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Fracture characterization: supracondylar vs. transcondylar, displaced vs. non-displaced, and whether intercondylar extension is present
- Explicit documentation that no manipulation was performed and clinical rationale (e.g., acceptable alignment on imaging)
- Imaging report or direct reference to fluoroscopic or plain-film findings confirming fracture pattern and position
- Type of immobilization applied (long-arm cast, sugar-tong splint, etc.) and laterality (left or right)
- Neurovascular status of the affected extremity documented pre- and post-immobilization
- Patient age and clinical context — pediatric vs. adult supracondylar fractures carry different management implications and audit scrutiny
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 24530 covers closed management of a supracondylar or transcondylar distal humerus fracture that does not require manipulation to achieve acceptable alignment. The fracture may have intercondylar extension. Because no reduction maneuver is performed, this code applies to stable, non-displaced, or minimally displaced fractures managed with immobilization — typically a long-arm cast or splint — and does not involve percutaneous pinning or open fixation. If manipulation is required, step up to 24535. If percutaneous skeletal fixation is added, use 24538 instead.
The 90-day global period covers the initial cast application, routine follow-up visits, imaging interpretation tied to fracture monitoring, and cast or splint changes through day 90. Any E/M service unrelated to the fracture management during that window requires modifier 24. If the decision for surgery is made the day of or day before the procedure at a separate E/M visit, append modifier 57 to that E/M code.
Site-of-service matters here: this procedure is performed in the office, emergency department, or outpatient hospital setting. The HOPD and ASC payment rates differ from the physician fee schedule — see the site-of-service comparison table on this page. Bilateral fractures are uncommon but, if treated in the same session, append modifier 50 and document both sides explicitly.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (3.6) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (13) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 3.6 |
| Practice expense RVU | 8.65 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.75 |
| Total RVU | 13 |
| Medicare national rate | $434.21 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $434.21 |
HOPD (APC 5111) Hospital outpatient department | $252.01 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $135.54 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 24530 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Upcoding flag: payer downcodes to 24530 when operative note for 24535 lacks documentation of a manipulation maneuver
- Global period conflict: E/M visit billed within 90-day global without modifier 24, triggering automatic bundling denial
- Missing laterality: claim submitted without LT or RT modifier when payer policy requires it, resulting in rejection
- Incorrect code selection: 24530 denied because imaging or notes describe a displaced fracture requiring reduction, which maps to 24535
- Duplicate claim: 24530 billed same-day as casting code (29000-series) without modifier 59, triggering NCCI bundling edit
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01When does 24530 cross over to 24535 or 24538?
02Can I bill a casting code on the same day as 24530?
03What modifier applies if the same surgeon treats a new, unrelated fracture during the 90-day global period?
04Is modifier 57 ever needed with 24530?
05Does 24530 require a specific place of service to be paid correctly?
06How do I handle bilateral supracondylar fractures treated in the same session?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits
- 03aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/coding-and-reimbursement/resident-guide/resident-guide_modifiers.pdf
- 04aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/coding-and-reimbursement/resident-guide/resident-guide-coding-reference-tools_what-is-ncci-ptp.pdf
- 05payerprice.comhttps://payerprice.com/rates/24530-CPT-fee-schedule
- 06aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/quality/coding-and-reimbursement/
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures fracture type (supracondylar vs. transcondylar), displacement status, presence or absence of intercondylar extension, whether manipulation was attempted or withheld and the clinical rationale, immobilization type and laterality, and neurovascular exam findings. This prevents the most common audit flag on 24530 — operative or encounter notes that describe fracture characteristics consistent with 24535 while the claim is submitted under 24530, or vice versa.
See how Mira captures CPT 24530 documentation