Closed treatment of a shoulder dislocation combined with a surgical or anatomical neck fracture of the humerus, with manipulation
Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $629.27
- Work RVU
- 6.11
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Shoulder
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 7 cited references ↓
- Specify dislocation direction (anterior, posterior, or inferior) and confirm glenohumeral joint involvement
- Identify fracture location as surgical neck or anatomical neck of the humerus — not just 'proximal humerus fracture'
- Document the manipulation technique and confirm reduction was achieved
- Include post-procedure imaging (AP and axillary or scapular Y radiographs) confirming reduction of both the dislocation and the fracture
- Record neurovascular status before and after reduction, including axillary nerve and brachial plexus assessment
- Document immobilization type applied (sling, shoulder immobilizer) and discharge instructions given
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓
CPT 23675 covers closed (non-operative) management of a simultaneous glenohumeral dislocation and humeral surgical or anatomical neck fracture, where the treating physician manually reduces both the dislocation and the fracture and performs manipulation of the shoulder joint — all without open surgical exposure. This is a higher-complexity injury combination than a pure dislocation, which is why it sits above 23665 (fracture-dislocation of the greater humeral tuberosity) and commands greater work RVUs than standalone dislocation codes.
The 90-day global period means all routine post-reduction care — follow-up visits, repeat imaging to confirm maintained reduction, sling management, and suture or staple removal — is bundled into the single payment. Any visit for an unrelated problem during that window requires modifier 24 on the E/M. If a subsequent procedure becomes necessary for a related complication (e.g., loss of reduction requiring additional manipulation), that encounter bills with modifier 78. An unrelated surgical procedure in the global uses modifier 79.
Document the injury pattern precisely: confirm both the dislocation direction (anterior, posterior, inferior) and the fracture location (surgical neck vs. anatomical neck) in the operative or procedure note. Imaging confirmation of the reduction — typically post-procedure radiographs — is expected. If anesthesia was required for manipulation, that is reported separately by the anesthesiologist; the surgeon does not add a modifier to 23675 to indicate anesthesia use.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (6.11) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (18.84) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 6.11 |
| Practice expense RVU | 11.4 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.33 |
| Total RVU | 18.84 |
| Medicare national rate | $629.27 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $629.27 |
HOPD (APC 5112) Hospital outpatient department | $1,642.82 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $872.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 23675 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Diagnosis code does not specify both a dislocation and a proximal humeral neck fracture — a pure dislocation ICD-10 alone will not support 23675
- Upcoding flag when clinical documentation describes only a dislocation reduction with no fracture component addressed
- Global period conflict — a routine follow-up E/M billed without modifier 24 during the 90-day global is denied as bundled
- Missing post-reduction imaging report in the record, triggering medical necessity denial on audit
- Procedure billed with modifier 50 (bilateral) — traumatic shoulder fracture-dislocations are virtually never bilateral; payers flag this automatically
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓
01What separates 23675 from 23655 (closed dislocation treatment with manipulation)?
02Should I bill 23675 or 23665 when the fracture involves the greater tuberosity?
03Is anesthesia for the manipulation billed separately by the surgeon?
04Can 23675 be billed bilaterally with modifier 50?
05What modifier applies if the patient loses reduction and requires repeat manipulation in the global period?
06How does the 90-day global affect billing for physical therapy referrals and post-reduction imaging?
07When is modifier 22 appropriate for 23675?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/r11781cp.pdf
- 03aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/23675
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/02-chapter2-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 05cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/medicare-ncci-policy-manual-2024-chapter-4.pdf
- 06cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/physician-self-referral/list-cpt-hcpcs-codes
- 07aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/coding-and-reimbursement/resident-guide/resident-guide-coding-reference-tools_what-is-ncci-mue_050125.pdf
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures dislocation direction, fracture location (surgical vs. anatomical neck), reduction technique, and pre/post neurovascular exam from dictation — then flags if the operative note omits the fracture component. That prevents the most common denial for 23675: a diagnosis code that supports only a dislocation, leaving the fracture-dislocation complexity unsubstantiated.
See how Mira captures CPT 23675 documentation