Closed treatment of shoulder dislocation combined with a fracture of the greater humeral tuberosity, performed with manipulation to restore joint alignment.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $498.34
- Work RVU
- 4.54
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Shoulder
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Imaging confirmation of both glenohumeral dislocation and greater humeral tuberosity fracture prior to manipulation
- Post-reduction imaging documenting restored joint alignment and fracture position
- Anesthesia type used during manipulation (conscious sedation, regional block, or general)
- Specific manipulation technique performed and the treating physician's clinical findings
- Immobilization method applied post-reduction (sling, shoulder immobilizer, etc.)
- Neurovascular assessment before and after reduction, particularly axillary nerve status
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 23665 covers closed (non-operative) reduction of a glenohumeral dislocation that occurs alongside a fracture of the greater humeral tuberosity. Manipulation is required and inherent to the code — there is no separate non-manipulation variant for this injury combination. The code bundles the reduction maneuver, any associated fracture management, and application of immobilization as needed.
The 90-day global period covers the day-before visit, the procedure itself, and all routine post-op care through day 90. Any E/M visit for an unrelated condition during that window requires modifier 24. If the injury requires escalation to open treatment (23670), that represents a distinct code and clinical scenario — don't use 23665 when internal fixation is performed.
Fluoroscopic confirmation of reduction is integral to the procedure and cannot be billed separately. Document pre- and post-reduction imaging findings, anesthesia type, and the specific manipulation technique in the operative note. Injuries involving the surgical or anatomical neck instead map to 23675 (closed) or 23680 (open) — verify fracture location on imaging before selecting 23665.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
Work RVU vs. total RVU
The work RVU (4.54) is the surgeon's own effort — the figure physician pay and productivity targets are built on. The total RVU (14.92) adds practice overhead and malpractice, and is what drives the Medicare payment below.
| Work RVU | 4.54 |
| Practice expense RVU | 9.38 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1 |
| Total RVU | 14.92 |
| Medicare national rate | $498.34 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $498.34 |
HOPD (APC 5112) Hospital outpatient department | $1,642.82 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $872.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 23665 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Fracture location not documented — payers deny when imaging reports reference 'proximal humerus' without specifying the greater tuberosity
- Fluoroscopy billed separately — it is integral to 23665 and will be bundled and denied
- Wrong code selected when internal fixation was performed — 23665 is closed treatment only; open fixation maps to 23670
- Missing post-reduction imaging documentation to support that manipulation was actually performed and successful
- E/M billed same-day without modifier 25, resulting in denial of the evaluation and management service
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01Is manipulation always required for 23665, or is there a without-manipulation variant?
02Can fluoroscopy or post-reduction X-rays be billed separately with 23665?
03What is the correct code if the surgeon ends up performing open reduction with internal fixation of the tuberosity fracture?
04How does the 90-day global period affect billing for follow-up shoulder care after 23665?
05Can 23665 be billed bilaterally with modifier 50?
06What ICD-10 diagnosis codes are typically paired with 23665?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02vsac.nlm.nih.govhttps://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/context/cs/codesystem/CPT/version/2021/code/23665/info
- 03mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/23665
- 04emedny.orghttps://www.emedny.org/ProviderManuals/Physician/PDFS/Physician_Procedure_Codes_Sect5__2015-2.pdf
- 05cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/medicare-ncci-policy-manual-2024-chapter-4.pdf
- 06cgsmedicare.comhttps://www.cgsmedicare.com/medicare_dynamic/j15/partb/ptpb/ptp.aspx
Mira Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the fracture location (greater humeral tuberosity, not surgical or anatomical neck), dislocation direction, manipulation technique, anesthesia type, and pre- and post-reduction neurovascular findings directly from dictation. This prevents the most common denial trigger for 23665: records that document a proximal humerus injury without specifying tuberosity involvement, which auditors and payers treat as insufficient to support the code.
See how Mira captures CPT 23665 documentation