Narrowing of the intervertebral foramina in the sacral region caused by connective tissue changes, disc material, or both — classified as a biomechanical lesion under the M99 category.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 4 sources ↓
- Status
- Billable
- Chapter
- 13
- Related CPT
- 9
- Region
- Spine
Documentation tips
What should appear in the chart to support M99.74.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 4 cited references ↓
- Provider must explicitly name the sacral region (or sacrococcygeal/sacroiliac sub-site) — 'lower spine' or 'lumbosacral' without further specificity defaults to a less precise code.
- Identify the stenotic mechanism: connective tissue fibrosis, disc material, or both. M99.74 covers either or a combination, but documentation should support why a more specific structural code (e.g., M51.1x for disc herniation) was not used instead.
- Record imaging findings that confirm foraminal narrowing at the sacral level — MRI signal change, CT foraminal diameter measurement, or myelogram findings at S1–S4.
- Note any prior conservative care (physical therapy, injections, manipulation) to support medical necessity, especially for pre-authorization or surgical referral encounters.
- If sacroiliac or sacrococcygeal involvement is the sub-site, document it explicitly so reviewers understand why M99.74 applies rather than M99.75 (pelvic region).
Related CPT procedures
Procedure codes commonly billed with M99.74. Linking the right diagnosis to the right procedure is what establishes medical necessity.
Source · CMS LCDs · AAOS specialty guidance · claims-pattern analysis
Common coding pitfalls
The recurring mistakes coders make with M99.74 and adjacent codes.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CDC ICD-10-CM tabular guidance, AAOS coding references, and cited references ↓
- Using M99.74 when a classifiable structural diagnosis exists: the M99 tabular note requires you to code the definitive diagnosis (e.g., herniated disc, spondylolisthesis) instead — M99.74 is a residual/biomechanical category.
- Confusing foraminal stenosis (M99.74) with neural canal stenosis: connective tissue or disc stenosis of the sacral neural canal is M99.44 (connective tissue) or M99.54 (disc) — the foramen and the canal are anatomically and code-set distinct.
- Defaulting to M99.74 for any sacral radiculopathy without imaging or clinical evidence of foraminal narrowing — this creates an unsupported diagnosis that will not survive audit.
- Coding M99.74 when the stenosis is in the pelvic region foramen rather than the sacral segment; that encounter maps to M99.75.
- Omitting a laterality or nerve root descriptor in the clinical note, which weakens medical necessity documentation even though the code itself does not require it.
Clinical context
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 4 cited references ↓
M99.74 captures foraminal stenosis at the sacral level when the mechanism is connective tissue fibrosis, disc encroachment, or a combination of both. This distinguishes it from osseous foraminal stenosis (M99.34, bony overgrowth) and subluxation-driven foraminal stenosis (M99.24). The sacral intervertebral foramina transmit sacral nerve roots; stenosis here can produce lower sacral radiculopathy, pelvic floor symptoms, or coccygeal pain patterns. The M99 category carries a critical tabular note: use M99.74 only if the condition cannot be classified elsewhere. If a definitive structural diagnosis is established — such as a herniated disc (M51.1x) or spondylolisthesis — code that condition first and evaluate whether M99.74 adds clinical specificity or becomes redundant.
The index cross-references sacrococcygeal and sacroiliac foraminal stenosis of connective tissue or disc origin to M99.74, so encounters involving those sub-sites within the sacral region land on the same code. Note the distinction from M99.75 (pelvic region foraminal stenosis) — if documentation specifies the pelvic foramen rather than the sacral segment, the correct code shifts to M99.75.
M99.74 appears frequently in chiropractic and osteopathic encounter billing (OMT claims), physical medicine contexts, and pain management workups for sacral nerve root compression. Orthopedic coders encounter it in spine surgery pre-authorization documentation and in evaluation of patients presenting with S1–S4 radicular patterns not explained by more specific structural pathology.
Sibling codes
Other billable codes under M99.7 (laterality / anatomic variants).
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 4 cited references ↓
01When should I use M99.74 instead of a disc herniation code like M51.17?
02Does M99.74 cover both sacroiliac and sacrococcygeal foraminal stenosis?
03What is the difference between M99.74 and M99.44 or M99.54?
04Is M99.74 appropriate for chiropractic or OMT encounter billing?
05What imaging documentation best supports M99.74?
06Can M99.74 be used as a primary diagnosis on a surgical pre-authorization?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CDC ICD-10-CM Tabular List 2026 (effective Oct 1, 2025)
- 02icd10data.comhttps://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/M00-M99/M99-M99/M99-/M99.74
- 03aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/icd-10-codes/M99.74
- 04icd10data.comhttps://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/M00-M99/M99-M99/M99-
Mira AI Scribe
Mira AI Scribe captures the sacral region localization, the provider's characterization of the stenotic mechanism (connective tissue, disc, or combined), and any imaging findings documenting foraminal narrowing at S1–S4. It also flags whether a more specific structural diagnosis (herniated disc, spondylolisthesis) was ruled out or addressed separately — preventing the most common audit vulnerability for M99.74, which is applying a biomechanical residual code when a classifiable structural code should lead.
See how Mira captures M99.74 documentation