ICD-10-CM · Shoulder

M99.67

M99.67 identifies osseous and subluxation stenosis of the intervertebral foramina affecting the upper extremity region — a biomechanical lesion in which bony overgrowth or vertebral segment subluxation narrows the foraminal opening through which nerve roots exit toward the shoulder, arm, or hand.

Verified May 8, 2026 · 4 sources ↓

Status
Billable
Chapter
13
Related CPT
10
Region
Shoulder
Drawn from CDCICD10DataAAPC

Documentation tips

What should appear in the chart to support M99.67.

Source · Editorial brief grounded in 4 cited references ↓

  • Specify the spinal level (e.g., C5-C6) contributing to the foraminal stenosis and confirm the neurological referral pattern is to the upper extremity — not just neck pain.
  • Record imaging evidence supporting osseous or subluxation-based stenosis: CT or MRI findings of osteophytic foraminal encroachment, facet arthrosis, or segmental malalignment narrow enough to impinge neural structures.
  • Distinguish the stenosis mechanism — osseous overgrowth or subluxation — from disc herniation or connective tissue stenosis; the latter belong to M99.7x codes, and conflating them invites an audit query.
  • If the clinical presentation includes upper extremity radiculopathy, document it separately so both the causative biomechanical lesion (M99.67) and the radiculopathy code can be reported together where supported.
  • Note laterality of upper extremity symptoms (right vs. left arm) in the clinical note even though M99.67 itself does not differentiate laterality — this supports medical necessity and downstream nerve conduction or surgical coding.

Related CPT procedures

Procedure codes commonly billed with M99.67. Linking the right diagnosis to the right procedure is what establishes medical necessity.

Source · CMS LCDs · AAOS specialty guidance · claims-pattern analysis

Common coding pitfalls

The recurring mistakes coders make with M99.67 and adjacent codes.

Source · Editorial brief grounded in CDC ICD-10-CM tabular guidance, AAOS coding references, and cited references ↓

  • Assigning M99.67 when the foraminal stenosis is documented at the cervical spinal level without confirmed upper extremity neurological distribution — M99.61 (cervical region) may be the correct sibling code in that scenario.
  • Using M99.67 for disc-mediated or connective tissue foraminal stenosis; those conditions map to the M99.7x category (e.g., M99.71 for cervical connective tissue and disc stenosis).
  • Applying 7th-character extensions (A, D, S) to M99.67 — Chapter 13 M-codes do not use encounter-type extensions; adding one creates an invalid code.
  • Defaulting to an unspecified spinal stenosis code (e.g., M48.02) when documentation actually specifies the biomechanical/subluxation mechanism — M99.67 is the more precise and appropriate choice in those cases.

Clinical context

Source · Editorial summary grounded in 4 cited references ↓

Use M99.67 when documentation specifically attributes upper extremity radicular or referred symptoms to foraminal stenosis caused by osseous changes (e.g., osteophyte encroachment, facet hypertrophy) or segmental subluxation at the relevant spinal level — not to a disc herniation or connective tissue obstruction (those belong to M99.7x). The code sits within the M99.6 parent category 'Osseous and subluxation stenosis of intervertebral foramina,' which is itself part of Chapter 13's biomechanical lesions block (M99). Because M99 codes represent biomechanical findings rather than primary structural disease diagnoses, they are frequently applied in chiropractic, physiatry, and orthopedic spine contexts where segmental dysfunction is the documented mechanism.

M99.67 is region-specific to the upper extremity, meaning the foraminal stenosis is impacting neural outflow toward the arm — most commonly at cervical levels C4–C8 or T1. If the stenosis is documented at the cervical spine level itself (not the upper extremity referral pattern), consider M99.61 (cervical region) instead. Distinguish carefully: M99.67 is coded when the clinical documentation anchors the stenosis effect to the upper extremity distribution, whereas M99.61 reflects the cervical spinal region as the primary site. When both the spinal level and upper extremity neurological distribution are documented, payer policy and clinical sequencing conventions determine which is primary.

This code does not carry 7th-character extension requirements — M-codes in Chapter 13 do not use the A/D/S encounter extensions. M99.67 is billable as a standalone code. It may be reported alongside radiculopathy codes (e.g., M54.12 for cervical radiculopathy) if the radiculopathy is separately documented, or alongside imaging-confirmed diagnoses, depending on payer guidelines.

Sibling codes

Other billable codes under M99.6 (laterality / anatomic variants).

Frequently asked questions

Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 4 cited references ↓

01What is the difference between M99.67 and M99.61?
M99.61 codes osseous and subluxation foraminal stenosis at the cervical spinal region itself; M99.67 is used when the stenosis effect is documented as impacting the upper extremity neurological distribution. If documentation ties the foraminal lesion to arm/hand symptoms rather than just the neck, M99.67 is appropriate.
02Can M99.67 be coded alongside a cervical radiculopathy code like M54.12?
Yes — M99.67 identifies the biomechanical lesion causing foraminal stenosis, while M54.12 captures the resulting cervical radiculopathy. Both can be reported together when each is independently documented, subject to payer-specific bundling policies.
03Does M99.67 require a 7th character?
No. M99.67 is a Chapter 13 M-code and does not use 7th-character extensions. The A/D/S encounter extensions apply to injury S-codes, not to musculoskeletal disease codes in the M series.
04What imaging supports medical necessity for M99.67?
CT or MRI documentation of osteophytic foraminal narrowing, facet joint hypertrophy impinging the foramen, or segmental subluxation with measurable foraminal compromise at the relevant cervical or upper thoracic level is the strongest medical necessity support.
05How does M99.67 differ from M99.77 (connective tissue and disc stenosis of intervertebral foramina of upper extremity)?
M99.67 is specific to osseous overgrowth or subluxation as the stenosis mechanism. M99.77 applies when disc material or connective tissue is the obstructing element. The distinction depends entirely on documented imaging and clinical findings — they cannot be used interchangeably.
06Is M99.67 used in chiropractic billing?
Yes. M99 codes are frequently associated with chiropractic and manual medicine encounters where segmental biomechanical dysfunction is the documented diagnosis. M99.67 is a billable code and is accepted by Medicare and most commercial payers when documented findings support the specificity.

Sources & references

Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.

  1. 01CDC ICD-10-CM Tabular List 2026 (FY2026, effective October 1, 2025)
  2. 02
    icd10data.com
    https://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/M00-M99/M99-M99/M99-/M99.67
  3. 03
    aapc.com
    https://www.aapc.com/codes/icd-10-codes/M99.67
  4. 04
    icd10data.com
    https://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/M00-M99/M99-M99/M99-

Mira AI Scribe

Mira captures the documented spinal level of foraminal narrowing, the stated mechanism (osseous overgrowth or segmental subluxation), and the confirmed upper extremity neurological referral pattern from the encounter note. This prevents foraminal region ambiguity that would force a downcode to a less-specific M99.6x sibling or an unrelated stenosis code, and avoids audit exposure from mechanism-mechanism mismatches between osseous and disc/connective tissue stenosis categories.

See how Mira captures M99.67 documentation

Related ICD-10 codes

Ready?

Ready to transform your orthopedic practice?

See how orthopedic practices are running documentation, billing, and operations on a single voice-first platform.

Get started for free