Infective bursitis affecting two or more distinct bursal sites simultaneously, where no single-site code captures the full clinical picture.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 4 sources ↓
- Status
- Billable
- Chapter
- 13
- Related CPT
- 9
- Region
- Multi-region
Documentation tips
What should appear in the chart to support M71.19.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 4 cited references ↓
- Name every bursal site affected (e.g., right olecranon bursa AND left prepatellar bursa) — 'multiple sites' is a fallback when individual sites cannot be discretely coded, not a substitute for thorough documentation.
- Record the identified or suspected causative organism and the diagnostic method (culture, Gram stain, serology) so the required B95.- or B96.- secondary code can be assigned accurately.
- Document whether each site was aspirated or drained and whether cultures were sent; procedure notes drive CPT selection and support medical necessity for the infection diagnosis.
- Capture immune status, diabetes, skin breakdown, or recent trauma at each site — these comorbidities affect medical necessity reviews and may require additional secondary codes.
- If treatment targets individual sites on separate dates, document site-specific findings at each visit to support potential reclassification to single-site codes on follow-up claims.
Related CPT procedures
Procedure codes commonly billed with M71.19. Linking the right diagnosis to the right procedure is what establishes medical necessity.
Source · CMS LCDs · AAOS specialty guidance · claims-pattern analysis
Common coding pitfalls
The recurring mistakes coders make with M71.19 and adjacent codes.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CDC ICD-10-CM tabular guidance, AAOS coding references, and cited references ↓
- Assigning M71.19 when the record identifies only one infected bursa — if a single site is documented, use the specific single-site code (M71.11–M71.18) instead.
- Skipping the mandatory secondary organism code (B95.- or B96.-); payers and auditors can flag claims where an infective code lacks an identified pathogen when one is documented.
- Confusing M71.19 with M70.- (bursitis due to use, overuse, or pressure) — M70.- is an Excludes1 condition; the two categories are mutually exclusive for the same site.
- Using M71.19 as a default 'catch-all' for any multi-site bursitis rather than verifying that the condition is truly infectious in origin; non-infective multi-site bursopathy belongs elsewhere in M71.
- Failing to update the code when follow-up documentation narrows the diagnosis to a single site — a subsequent encounter with site-specific findings should be recoded to the appropriate lateralized single-site code.
Clinical context
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 4 cited references ↓
M71.19 applies when a patient presents with infectious inflammation of bursae at multiple anatomical locations — for example, concurrent septic bursitis of the elbow and knee — and no single-site M71.1x code covers all affected sites. Under ICD-10-CM Chapter 13 guidelines, a 'multiple sites' code is appropriate only when the medical record explicitly documents involvement at more than one site; if the record specifies each site individually, assign the single-site codes instead (e.g., M71.121 for right elbow plus M71.161 for right knee).
The parent category M71.1 carries a mandatory 'Use additional code' instruction to identify the causative organism — B95.- for streptococcal and staphylococcal organisms, B96.- for other bacterial agents. Omitting that secondary code is a documentation and billing gap. Common causative organisms in orthopedic settings include Staphylococcus aureus (including MRSA) and gram-negative bacilli in immunocompromised patients.
Do not use M71.19 for bursitis caused by repetitive use or pressure (M70.-), for enthesopathies (M76–M77), or for bunion-related bursitis (M20.1) — all are Excludes1 conditions under M71. If only one site is infected, drop to the appropriate single-site code within M71.11–M71.18.
Sibling codes
Other billable codes under M71.1 (laterality / anatomic variants).
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 4 cited references ↓
01When is M71.19 the right choice over coding each site individually?
02Is the secondary organism code (B95.- or B96.-) truly required, or just recommended?
03Can M71.19 be used for bursitis caused by repeated friction or pressure at multiple sites?
04What CPT codes typically accompany M71.19 in an orthopedic setting?
05How does M71.19 differ from M71.18 (other infective bursitis, other site)?
06Does M71.19 require a 7th-character extension?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CDC ICD-10-CM Tabular List 2026 — https://icd10cmtool.cdc.gov/
- 02CMS ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY2025 — https://www.cms.gov/files/document/fy-2025-icd-10-cm-coding-guidelines.pdf
- 03ICD10Data.com 2026 code reference — https://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/M00-M99/M70-M79/M71-/M71.19
- 04AAPC Codify M71.19 — https://www.aapc.com/codes/icd-10-codes/M71.19
Mira AI Scribe
Mira captures the name and laterality of each infected bursal site, onset timeline, aspiration or drainage findings, culture or Gram stain results, and the identified organism — populating both M71.19 and the required B95.-/B96.- secondary code automatically. This prevents the most common audit trigger for infective bursitis claims: an infectious diagnosis coded without an organism.
See how Mira captures M71.19 documentation