ICD-10-CM · Knee

M23.90

M23.90 classifies internal derangement of the knee when neither the specific type of derangement nor the laterality (right or left) is documented in the medical record.

Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓

Status
Billable
Chapter
13
Related CPT
10
Region
Knee
Drawn from CDCICD10DataAAPCIcdcodesSprypt

Documentation tips

What should appear in the chart to support M23.90.

Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓

  • Document the specific knee (right or left) by name at every encounter — 'left knee' in the assessment moves you immediately to M23.92 and avoids the unspecified designation.
  • Record the working or confirmed derangement type (e.g., meniscal tear, chronic instability, loose body) so you can assign a more specific M23 subcategory rather than defaulting to M23.90.
  • Link MRI or X-ray findings explicitly to the clinical impression — note joint space, meniscal signal, ligament integrity, or loose body presence so the derangement type is supportable on audit.
  • If imaging is pending, document that laterality and derangement type are not yet confirmed; this justifies M23.90 as a temporary code and shows audit-conscious intent to update the diagnosis.
  • For any subsequent encounter after imaging results are available, update the diagnosis code — leaving M23.90 on a claim for a procedure like arthroscopy is a common audit trigger.

Related CPT procedures

Procedure codes commonly billed with M23.90. Linking the right diagnosis to the right procedure is what establishes medical necessity.

Source · CMS LCDs · AAOS specialty guidance · claims-pattern analysis

Common coding pitfalls

The recurring mistakes coders make with M23.90 and adjacent codes.

Source · Editorial brief grounded in CDC ICD-10-CM tabular guidance, AAOS coding references, and cited references ↓

  • Using M23.90 on the procedure claim after MRI or arthroscopy has already confirmed laterality and derangement type — at that point a specific code is required and M23.90 will not support medical necessity.
  • Confusing M23.90 (unspecified derangement, unspecified knee) with M23.91 (unspecified derangement, right knee) or M23.92 (unspecified derangement, left knee) — check the chart for any laterality documentation before defaulting to .90.
  • Defaulting to M23.90 when the note says 'internal derangement' without specifying type, even though the same note documents which knee was examined — that's a laterality capture failure, not a true unspecified scenario.
  • Pairing M23.90 with a laterality-specific CPT code (e.g., 29881 for right knee) — the diagnosis and procedure laterality mismatch will trigger an edit or denial.
  • Failing to recode at the surgical encounter when the operative report documents the specific derangement found; leaving M23.90 on the surgical claim understates specificity and risks downcoded reimbursement or audit findings.

Clinical context

Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓

Use M23.90 only when the clinical documentation fails to identify both the nature of the derangement and the affected side. This is the most nonspecific code in the M23.9x family — if laterality is known, use M23.91 (right) or M23.92 (left). If the derangement type is known (e.g., meniscal tear, ligamentous instability, loose body), a more specific M23 subcategory applies and should be used instead.

In practice, M23.90 is appropriate during a very early workup phase — for example, when a patient presents with knee symptoms and internal derangement is clinically suspected but imaging has not yet confirmed the pathology and the chart does not specify which knee. It should not persist as the working diagnosis once MRI or arthroscopic findings are available. Payers routinely scrutinize unspecified codes, and M23.90 in particular can trigger medical necessity denials when submitted against procedures like arthroscopy that require laterality-specific coding.

Once the derangement is characterized — meniscal tear (M23.2x), ligamentous instability (M23.5x), loose body (M24.0x), or another specific type — recode accordingly. If only laterality is clarified without a specific derangement type, move to M23.91 or M23.92. M23.90 should be a transitional code, not a final diagnosis.

Sibling codes

Other billable codes under M23.9 (laterality / anatomic variants).

Frequently asked questions

Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓

01When is M23.90 appropriate to use?
M23.90 is appropriate only when the clinical record does not specify which knee is affected and does not identify the type of internal derangement. It is most defensible as a temporary code during an early diagnostic workup before imaging results are available.
02What is the difference between M23.90, M23.91, and M23.92?
The sixth character captures laterality: M23.90 = unspecified knee, M23.91 = right knee, M23.92 = left knee. All three indicate an unspecified derangement type. If you know which knee is involved, use M23.91 or M23.92 — never default to M23.90 when laterality is documented.
03Can I use M23.90 on a knee arthroscopy claim?
In most cases, no. Arthroscopy CPT codes are inherently laterality-specific, and pairing them with M23.90 creates a diagnosis-procedure mismatch. By the time surgery is performed, the derangement type and affected knee should be confirmed — use the appropriate specific M23 subcategory with matching laterality.
04What more specific codes should I consider before using M23.90?
Check whether the derangement has been identified as a meniscal tear (M23.2x), chronic instability (M23.5x), loose body (M24.0x), or another specific condition. If the type is known but laterality is not, a laterality-unspecified variant of that specific subcategory is still more precise than M23.90.
05Will payers deny claims coded with M23.90?
Payers do not automatically deny M23.90, but it draws scrutiny — especially on claims for diagnostic or surgical procedures. Medical necessity reviews may question why a more specific diagnosis was not used, and claims paired with laterality-specific procedures are at high risk of edit or denial.
06Should I update M23.90 once imaging results are back?
Yes. Once MRI or other imaging confirms the derangement type and laterality, recode to the most specific applicable M23 subcategory for all subsequent encounters. Leaving M23.90 in place after confirmatory findings is a coding error that can affect reimbursement and create audit exposure.
07Is M23.90 valid for FY2026 claims?
Yes. M23.90 became effective October 1, 2025 under the FY2026 ICD-10-CM code set and is a billable, specific code. Its validity for billing does not mean it is appropriate in every clinical context — specificity requirements still apply.

Mira AI Scribe

The Mira AI Scribe captures laterality (right vs. left), symptom description (locking, giving way, effusion), physical exam findings (McMurray's, Lachman, joint line tenderness), and any available imaging results — MRI signal changes, meniscal morphology, ligament integrity — at the point of documentation. Capturing these elements at the initial encounter prevents M23.90 from carrying forward into subsequent or surgical claims where a specific, laterality-confirmed code is required.

See how Mira captures M23.90 documentation

Related ICD-10 codes

Ready?

Ready to transform your orthopedic practice?

See how orthopedic practices are running documentation, billing, and operations on a single voice-first platform.

Get started for free