Lead-induced gout affecting multiple joint sites simultaneously, classified under secondary gout caused by toxic lead exposure.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 4 sources ↓
- Status
- Billable
- Chapter
- 13
- Related CPT
- 5
- Region
- Multi-region
Documentation tips
What should appear in the chart to support M10.19.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 4 cited references ↓
- Provider must explicitly document lead as the causative agent — 'gout secondary to lead toxicity' or equivalent language is required to support M10.19 over idiopathic gout codes.
- Record every affected joint by name and side; 'multiple sites' requires at least two distinct anatomical locations documented in the same encounter note.
- Always assign a companion T56.0- code (toxic effects of lead and its compounds) with the appropriate 7th character (A, D, or S) per Tabular List instruction.
- Document the source or route of lead exposure (occupational, environmental, retained projectile, etc.) to support medical necessity and toxicology workup coding.
- Capture serum uric acid level, blood lead level result, and any joint aspiration findings (urate crystals) to substantiate both the gout diagnosis and the lead-toxic etiology.
- If the patient has chronic lead nephropathy contributing to impaired urate excretion, document that relationship — it supports the lead-induced mechanism and may warrant an additional renal code.
Related CPT procedures
Procedure codes commonly billed with M10.19. Linking the right diagnosis to the right procedure is what establishes medical necessity.
Source · CMS LCDs · AAOS specialty guidance · claims-pattern analysis
Common coding pitfalls
The recurring mistakes coders make with M10.19 and adjacent codes.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CDC ICD-10-CM tabular guidance, AAOS coding references, and cited references ↓
- Omitting the required T56.0- companion code — the Tabular List 'Code Also' instruction makes it mandatory, and claims submitted without it are incomplete.
- Using M10.19 when only one joint is involved — multiple sites means polyarticular; single-site lead-induced gout requires a laterality-specific M10.1x code.
- Defaulting to M10.9 (gout, unspecified) or M10.0x (idiopathic gout) when lead etiology is documented — if the provider attributes gout to lead toxicity, the secondary gout code must reflect that specificity.
- Assigning M10.19 without querying the provider when the note says 'gout' in a patient with known lead exposure but does not explicitly link the two — don't assume causation; query first.
- Confusing M10.19 (lead-induced gout, multiple sites) with M1A.19 (chronic lead-induced gout, multiple sites) — use M10.19 for acute flares; M1A.19 when the provider documents chronic tophaceous gout due to lead.
Clinical context
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 4 cited references ↓
M10.19 applies when a patient presents with gout that is directly attributable to lead toxicity and the gouty involvement spans multiple anatomical sites — for example, simultaneous involvement of the first MTP joint, knee, and ankle. This is a secondary gout subtype under M10.1 (lead-induced gout); use it only when the provider has documented both the lead etiology and polyarticular distribution.
Critically, the ICD-10-CM Tabular List instructs coders to also assign a code from T56.0- (toxic effects of lead and its compounds) to identify the lead exposure. That companion code is mandatory, not optional — omitting it creates an incomplete code set and may trigger a payer query or denial. The T56.0- code carries 7th-character extensions: A (initial encounter), D (subsequent encounter), S (sequela).
If the gouty flare involves only one joint or one anatomical region, use the site-specific M10.1x code instead (e.g., M10.161 for the right knee). Reserve M10.19 strictly for confirmed polyarticular presentations. If the provider documents lead exposure and gout but does not specify the number of sites affected, query before defaulting to M10.10 (unspecified site).
Sibling codes
Other billable codes under M10.1 (laterality / anatomic variants).
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 4 cited references ↓
01Do I have to assign a second code alongside M10.19?
02What distinguishes M10.19 from M1A.19?
03Can I use M10.19 if the provider documents gout and the patient has a history of lead exposure but doesn't explicitly link them?
04What counts as 'multiple sites' for M10.19?
05Which CPT procedures are commonly billed with M10.19?
06Is M10.19 valid for FY2026 claims?
07Should M10.19 be the principal or secondary diagnosis?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CDC ICD-10-CM Tabular List 2026 (effective October 1, 2025)
- 02ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY2026 — http://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/250974
- 03icd10data.com — https://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/M00-M99/M05-M14/M10-/M10.19
- 04AAPC Codify — https://www.aapc.com/codes/icd-10-codes/M10.19
Mira AI Scribe
The Mira AI Scribe captures the provider's explicit attribution of gout to lead toxicity, the list of all affected joints with laterality, serum uric acid and blood lead level results, and any crystal analysis from joint aspiration. This prevents claim submission with an incomplete code set (missing T56.0-), avoids downgrade to unspecified gout M10.9, and flags when only a single site is documented so the coder selects the correct site-specific M10.1x code instead.
See how Mira captures M10.19 documentation