Glossary · Reimbursement
Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS)
The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) is the federal payment system CMS uses to reimburse physicians and certain non-physician practitioners for Part B services, calculating each payment from a CPT code's relative value units multiplied by an annually updated conversion factor.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 8 sources ↓
Definition
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 8 cited references ↓
The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule has governed Part B physician payments since January 1, 1992. For every covered service, CMS assigns three categories of relative value units (RVUs): physician work, practice expense, and malpractice expense. Those RVUs are adjusted for geographic cost differences using Geographic Practice Cost Indices (GPCIs), summed, and then multiplied by the conversion factor—a single dollar-per-RVU figure CMS sets each calendar year through federal rulemaking—to produce the national allowed amount. Medicare then pays 80 percent of that allowed amount once the annual deductible is satisfied; the beneficiary or a secondary payer is responsible for the remaining 20 percent coinsurance.
CMS publishes proposed PFS rules each July in the Federal Register and finalizes them in November, with changes effective January 1 of the following year. The conversion factor is subject to statutory budget-neutrality requirements: when RVUs increase for some services, CMS must reduce the conversion factor to prevent total PFS spending from exceeding a legislated ceiling unless Congress acts to offset those cuts. For CY 2026, CMS finalized two separate conversion factors for the first time under MACRA: $33.5875 for Advanced APM Qualifying Participants (a roughly 3.84 percent increase over 2025) and $33.4209 for all other providers (roughly 3.32 percent higher). These are the first positive updates in six years, though orthopedic specialty societies note cumulative inflation-adjusted losses since 2001 remain substantial.
The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Database (MPFSDB) is the authoritative file CMS releases to Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) each year. It contains the total fee schedule amount, component RVU values, geographic adjusters, and payment policy indicators for every active HCPCS/CPT code. MACs implement these amounts on January 1; any mid-year legislative changes—such as the March 2024 Consolidated Appropriations Act correction that raised the CY 2024 conversion factor from $32.74 to $33.29—require CMS to release updated payment files to MACs.
Why it matters
For orthopedic practices, the PFS conversion factor and RVU assignments directly set the upper ceiling on Medicare revenue for every procedure and evaluation and management visit. Billing above the fee schedule amount yields no additional Medicare payment—the allowed charge is always the lower of the billed charge or the fee schedule amount. Misidentifying the correct facility versus non-facility rate (which differ because practice expense RVUs diverge by site of service) routinely causes either underbilling in the office setting or incorrect expectations for ASC cases. Budget-neutrality-driven conversion factor cuts also create year-over-year revenue cliffs that affect staffing and practice viability, which is why AAOS and AAHKS file formal comment letters annually and why tracking the final rule—not just the proposed rule—is essential before January 1 each year.
Common mistakes
Where people most often go wrong with this concept.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in cited references ↓
- Using the non-facility fee schedule amount for procedures performed in a facility (hospital or ASC), which overstates the expected physician payment and creates cash-flow projection errors.
- Assuming the conversion factor from a prior year still applies after January 1 without downloading the updated MPFSDB file from CMS.
- Overlooking mid-year legislative corrections—Congress occasionally adjusts the conversion factor after the final rule, as it did in March 2024, making the January 1 rate retroactively obsolete for part of the year.
- Confusing the PFS allowed amount with the actual Medicare payment: Medicare pays 80 percent of the allowed amount after deductible, not the full fee schedule figure.
- Treating the PFS conversion factor as an inflation index—it does not automatically adjust for practice cost inflation, and cumulative real-dollar losses since 2001 are substantial.
- Failing to account for budget-neutrality adjustments when projecting the impact of new or revised CPT codes; a work RVU increase for one code can trigger a conversion factor reduction that partially offsets the gain.
Related codes
Codes commonly involved when this concept appears in practice.
CPT
- 27447 $1,159.35Knee replacement surgery addressing both the medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartments, with or without resurfacing of the patella.
- 27130 $1,162.02Primary total hip arthroplasty replacing both the acetabular socket and proximal femoral components with prosthetic implants, with or without bone graft.
- 29827 $976.31Arthroscopic surgical repair of the rotator cuff, performed entirely through the shoulder joint via endoscopic technique.
- 27279 $758.53Minimally invasive arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint using a transfixing implant device placed percutaneously across the joint.
- 99213 $95.19Established patient office or outpatient visit requiring 20–29 minutes of total time or low-complexity medical decision-making.
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 8 cited references ↓
01What is the Medicare PFS conversion factor for 2026?
02How does the facility versus non-facility rate affect orthopedic reimbursement?
03Why does the conversion factor sometimes decrease even when CMS raises RVUs for certain codes?
04Where can I find the official Medicare PFS payment amounts for a specific CPT code?
05Does the PFS apply to outpatient physical and occupational therapy billed by orthopedic practices?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/fee-schedules/physician
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/guidance/manuals/downloads/clm104c23.pdf
- 03federalregister.govhttps://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/11/05/2025-19787/medicare-and-medicaid-programs-cy-2026-payment-policies-under-the-physician-fee-schedule-and-other
- 04aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/advocacy/rules/aaos-cy-2026-mpfs-comment-letter.pdf
- 05aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/advocacy/rules/aaos-cy-2026-mpfs-proposed-rule-summary.pdf
- 06aahks.orghttps://www.aahks.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/AAHKS-Summary-2024-Medicare-PFS-and-OPPS-Final-Rules-Dec-5-2023-1.pdf
- 07ama-assn.orghttps://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/medicare-medicaid/medicare-physician-payment-schedule
- 08cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/article.aspx?articleId=56566&ver=38
Mira AI Scribe
Mira uses the current-year Medicare Physician Fee Schedule to validate expected payment before claim submission. When documentation is finalized, Mira cross-checks the selected CPT code against the MPFSDB to flag: (1) whether the procedure is priced in the facility or non-facility setting consistent with the place-of-service code on the claim; (2) whether a modifier—such as modifier 26 for professional component only—is required to match the RVU split documented; and (3) whether the service falls under a global surgery package that would make a separately billed post-op visit a PFS duplicate. If the rendered place of service is an ASC or hospital outpatient department, Mira will surface the facility rate rather than the non-facility rate to set accurate reimbursement expectations. For E/M visits documented on the same date as a procedure with a global period, Mira prompts the provider to confirm whether modifier 25 is clinically supported before appending it, because an unsupported modifier 25 on a same-day E/M is a common PFS audit trigger. Mira also alerts users when a code is flagged as potentially misvalued by CMS in the current rule cycle, which may indicate a pending RVU change that affects multi-year financial projections.
See Mira's approachRelated terms
The conversion factor (CF) is a national dollar multiplier—set at $32.3465 for 2025—that CMS multiplies by a service's geographically adjusted relative value units (RVUs) to produce the Medicare-allowed payment for that service under the Physician Fee Schedule.
A Geographic Practice Cost Index (GPCI) is a Medicare locality-specific multiplier applied to each of the three RVU components—physician work, practice expense, and professional liability insurance—to adjust the Physician Fee Schedule payment for local cost differences. Together, the three GPCIs ensure that reimbursement reflects what it actually costs to deliver care in a given market.
A Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) is a private insurance company under contract with CMS to process and pay Medicare Part A and Part B fee-for-service claims within an assigned geographic jurisdiction. MACs are the primary point of contact for providers on coverage policies, claims adjudication, and local coverage determinations.
MACRA (Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015) is the bipartisan federal law that repealed the Sustainable Growth Rate formula and replaced it with the Quality Payment Program, which ties Medicare physician reimbursement to value-based performance through MIPS or alternative payment models.
HCPCS Level II is the CMS-maintained alphanumeric code set used to bill products, supplies, and services—such as DME, orthotics, prosthetics, and injectable drugs—that CPT codes do not adequately describe. Each code consists of one letter (A–V) followed by four digits.
A CPT code is a standardized five-digit numeric code, maintained by the AMA, that identifies a specific medical or surgical service for billing and reimbursement purposes. In orthopedics, CPT codes cover everything from office visits and joint injections to complex spinal fusions and total joint replacements.