Glossary · Documentation
History and physical (H&P)
A history and physical (H&P) is a structured clinical assessment documenting a patient's medical history, current complaints, and physical examination findings, completed before surgery or a significant procedure to establish medical necessity and identify risk factors.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
Definition
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
The history and physical is the foundational documentation record for any orthopedic surgical or procedural encounter. The history component captures the chief complaint, history of present illness, past medical and surgical history, medications, allergies, family history, social history, and a review of systems. The physical examination component records pertinent musculoskeletal and systemic findings, including range of motion, neurovascular status, strength, and any co-morbid conditions relevant to anesthesia or surgical risk.
For ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), CMS regulations under 42 CFR 416.52(a)(1) have historically required a comprehensive H&P completed no more than 30 days before the scheduled procedure. If performed on the same day as surgery at the ASC, the anesthesia and procedural risk assessment must be conducted as a separate, discrete element rather than embedded in the H&P update. When a previously completed H&P is used, the treating physician must review it, confirm it is still current and accurate, and document an update note before the procedure begins.
For Evaluation and Management (E/M) coding purposes, CMS and AMA significantly revised the rules effective January 1, 2021. History and physical examination components no longer drive E/M level selection for office and outpatient visits; Medical Decision-Making (MDM) or total time on the date of the encounter now determines the CPT code billed. Nevertheless, the H&P remains clinically and regulatorily essential as the documentation foundation for establishing medical necessity, supporting prior authorizations, and satisfying accreditation requirements under The Joint Commission and CMS Conditions of Participation.
Why it matters
An incomplete or missing H&P is one of the most direct triggers for claim denial, audit findings, and surgical delay. Payers rely on H&P documentation to confirm medical necessity; if the record does not demonstrate why the procedure was clinically indicated, the claim is vulnerable regardless of how accurately the CPT and ICD-10 codes are selected. Under Joint Commission standards, a privileged physician must review and attest to any H&P not personally performed, and a medical student's H&P carries no independent legal standing. In the ASC setting, a stale H&P—one older than 30 days at the time of surgery—requires a compliant update note; failure to document that update exposes the facility to a failed survey finding. For prior authorizations on MRIs, injections, and complex surgeries, payers increasingly demand the H&P alongside imaging reports before granting approval; a missing or vague H&P forces costly resubmissions and delays care.
Common mistakes
Where people most often go wrong with this concept.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in cited references ↓
- Using an H&P older than 30 days without documenting a dated update note that confirms the patient's condition is unchanged and the procedure remains appropriate.
- Failing to keep the anesthesia and procedural risk assessment as a separate section when the H&P is performed on the same day as the ASC procedure.
- Treating the H&P as a box-checking exercise and omitting clinically relevant co-morbidities—such as anticoagulant use, uncontrolled hypertension, or diabetes—that directly affect surgical and anesthesia risk.
- Allowing a medical student's H&P to serve as the primary H&P of record without a fully documented review, attestation, and update by a privileged practitioner.
- Documenting diagnoses as 'suspected' or 'probable' in the H&P assessment section, which forces coders to assign sign/symptom codes instead of definitive diagnosis codes, potentially affecting medical necessity justification.
- Assuming that because H&P components no longer determine E/M level selection (post-2021 rules), a thorough H&P is no longer needed—it remains required for medical necessity, accreditation, and pre-surgical clearance.
Related codes
Codes commonly involved when this concept appears in practice.
CPT
- 99203 $117.57New patient office or outpatient visit requiring a medically appropriate history and/or examination with low-complexity medical decision-making, or 30–44 minutes of total provider time on the date of the encounter.
- 99204 $177.36New patient office or outpatient visit requiring moderate medical decision making, or 45–59 minutes of total provider time on the date of the encounter.
- 99205 $236.81New patient office or outpatient visit requiring high-complexity medical decision making, or 60–74 minutes of total time on the date of encounter.
- 99213 $95.19Established patient office or outpatient visit requiring 20–29 minutes of total time or low-complexity medical decision-making.
- 99214 $135.61Office visit for an established patient requiring moderate-complexity medical decision making (MDM), or 30–39 minutes of total provider time on the date of service.
- 99215 $192.39Highest-level office or outpatient E/M visit for an established patient, qualifying via high-complexity medical decision making or 40–54 minutes of total provider time on the date of service.
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01How old can an H&P be before surgery at an ASC?
02Does the H&P still affect E/M coding after the 2021 rule changes?
03Can a nurse practitioner or physician assistant complete the H&P?
04Can a medical student's H&P satisfy the pre-surgical requirement?
05What happens if the H&P is done the same day as the ASC procedure?
06Why does a vague H&P affect ICD-10 coding?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-Certification/SurveyCertificationGenInfo/downloads/SCLetter11_06.pdf
- 02jointcommission.orghttps://www.jointcommission.org/en-us/knowledge-library/support-center/standards-interpretation/standards-faqs/000002272
- 03aao.orghttps://www.aao.org/practice-management/news-detail/cms-updates-health-physical-requirements
- 04aoassn.orghttps://www.aoassn.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/CodingTTP.pdf
- 05rivethealth.comhttps://www.rivethealth.com/blog/5-common-orthopaedic-coding-mistakes
- 0642 CFR 416.52(a)(1) – CMS Conditions for Coverage: ASC Admission and Pre-surgical Assessment
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe actively participates in H&P documentation by structuring dictated or transcribed notes into the discrete components required for compliance: chief complaint, HPI, ROS, PFSH, and physical examination findings. For orthopedic encounters, Mira prompts for laterality, fracture characteristics (type, pattern, displacement, open vs. closed), and relevant co-morbidities that downstream coders need to assign the most specific ICD-10 codes and support medical necessity. When a procedure is scheduled, Mira flags whether the H&P on file is within the 30-day CMS window. If it is not, the scribe surfaces an update note template so the treating physician can attest that the patient's condition has been reviewed, any interval changes are documented, and the procedure remains appropriate—satisfying 42 CFR 416.52(a)(1) without a separate manual workflow step. Mira also distinguishes between definitive diagnoses and language that signals a suspected or unconfirmed condition. If the assessment section contains terms like 'probable,' 'suspected,' or 'rule out,' the scribe flags the finding and prompts the physician to clarify, preventing coders from inadvertently assigning a diagnosis code before confirmation is available. This directly reduces the risk of pre-assignment denials and keeps the claim defensible at audit.
See Mira's approachRelated terms
Evaluation and management (E/M) codes are CPT codes that describe cognitive clinical services—history-taking, examination, and medical decision-making—as opposed to procedural or surgical work. In orthopedics, they are used to bill office visits, consultations, and hospital encounters that are not bundled into a surgical global period.
Medical necessity is the standard requiring that a service or item be reasonable and appropriate for diagnosing or treating a patient's condition according to accepted clinical practice. Payers—including Medicare—use this standard to determine whether a claim will be covered and paid.
Prior authorization (PA) is a payer requirement that a provider obtain approval before delivering a specific service, procedure, or item—otherwise the claim will be denied regardless of medical necessity. Approval is granted when submitted clinical documentation meets the payer's coverage criteria.