Glossary · Documentation

History and physical (H&P)

A history and physical (H&P) is a structured clinical assessment documenting a patient's medical history, current complaints, and physical examination findings, completed before surgery or a significant procedure to establish medical necessity and identify risk factors.

Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓

Drawn from CMSJointcommissionAaoAoassnRivethealth

Definition

Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓

The history and physical is the foundational documentation record for any orthopedic surgical or procedural encounter. The history component captures the chief complaint, history of present illness, past medical and surgical history, medications, allergies, family history, social history, and a review of systems. The physical examination component records pertinent musculoskeletal and systemic findings, including range of motion, neurovascular status, strength, and any co-morbid conditions relevant to anesthesia or surgical risk.

For ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), CMS regulations under 42 CFR 416.52(a)(1) have historically required a comprehensive H&P completed no more than 30 days before the scheduled procedure. If performed on the same day as surgery at the ASC, the anesthesia and procedural risk assessment must be conducted as a separate, discrete element rather than embedded in the H&P update. When a previously completed H&P is used, the treating physician must review it, confirm it is still current and accurate, and document an update note before the procedure begins.

For Evaluation and Management (E/M) coding purposes, CMS and AMA significantly revised the rules effective January 1, 2021. History and physical examination components no longer drive E/M level selection for office and outpatient visits; Medical Decision-Making (MDM) or total time on the date of the encounter now determines the CPT code billed. Nevertheless, the H&P remains clinically and regulatorily essential as the documentation foundation for establishing medical necessity, supporting prior authorizations, and satisfying accreditation requirements under The Joint Commission and CMS Conditions of Participation.

Why it matters

An incomplete or missing H&P is one of the most direct triggers for claim denial, audit findings, and surgical delay. Payers rely on H&P documentation to confirm medical necessity; if the record does not demonstrate why the procedure was clinically indicated, the claim is vulnerable regardless of how accurately the CPT and ICD-10 codes are selected. Under Joint Commission standards, a privileged physician must review and attest to any H&P not personally performed, and a medical student's H&P carries no independent legal standing. In the ASC setting, a stale H&P—one older than 30 days at the time of surgery—requires a compliant update note; failure to document that update exposes the facility to a failed survey finding. For prior authorizations on MRIs, injections, and complex surgeries, payers increasingly demand the H&P alongside imaging reports before granting approval; a missing or vague H&P forces costly resubmissions and delays care.

Common mistakes

Where people most often go wrong with this concept.

Source · Editorial brief grounded in cited references ↓

  • Using an H&P older than 30 days without documenting a dated update note that confirms the patient's condition is unchanged and the procedure remains appropriate.
  • Failing to keep the anesthesia and procedural risk assessment as a separate section when the H&P is performed on the same day as the ASC procedure.
  • Treating the H&P as a box-checking exercise and omitting clinically relevant co-morbidities—such as anticoagulant use, uncontrolled hypertension, or diabetes—that directly affect surgical and anesthesia risk.
  • Allowing a medical student's H&P to serve as the primary H&P of record without a fully documented review, attestation, and update by a privileged practitioner.
  • Documenting diagnoses as 'suspected' or 'probable' in the H&P assessment section, which forces coders to assign sign/symptom codes instead of definitive diagnosis codes, potentially affecting medical necessity justification.
  • Assuming that because H&P components no longer determine E/M level selection (post-2021 rules), a thorough H&P is no longer needed—it remains required for medical necessity, accreditation, and pre-surgical clearance.

Related codes

Codes commonly involved when this concept appears in practice.

Frequently asked questions

Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓

01How old can an H&P be before surgery at an ASC?
Under 42 CFR 416.52(a)(1), the comprehensive H&P must be completed no more than 30 days before the date of the scheduled surgery. If the H&P is older than 30 days, a compliant update note—reviewed and attested by a privileged physician—must be completed before the procedure begins.
02Does the H&P still affect E/M coding after the 2021 rule changes?
For office and outpatient E/M visits, history and physical examination components no longer determine the CPT level billed. Level selection is now based solely on Medical Decision-Making complexity or total time spent on the date of service. However, a thorough H&P remains mandatory for medical necessity documentation, pre-surgical clearance, and accreditation compliance.
03Can a nurse practitioner or physician assistant complete the H&P?
Yes, provided that state law and the facility's credentialing policies permit it. A privileged practitioner must review the H&P, confirm it meets the organization's defined minimum content requirements, and document any updates or missing information with a signature and date.
04Can a medical student's H&P satisfy the pre-surgical requirement?
No. A medical student has no independent legal status as a healthcare provider. A medical student's H&P cannot fulfill pre-surgical assessment requirements on its own; a privileged practitioner must perform or fully re-document the assessment.
05What happens if the H&P is done the same day as the ASC procedure?
The H&P is permitted on the same day as surgery, but the anesthesia and procedural risk assessment must be documented as a separate component—it cannot simply be folded into the H&P or its update. The ASC must have approved policies ensuring this separate assessment is completed just prior to every procedure.
06Why does a vague H&P affect ICD-10 coding?
Coders select diagnosis codes based on what is documented. If the H&P assessment records a diagnosis as 'suspected' or 'probable' rather than confirmed, coders are required to report the presenting sign or symptom—such as knee pain—rather than the suspected condition. This can weaken medical necessity support and affect coverage determinations for imaging or surgery.

Mira AI Scribe

Mira's AI scribe actively participates in H&P documentation by structuring dictated or transcribed notes into the discrete components required for compliance: chief complaint, HPI, ROS, PFSH, and physical examination findings. For orthopedic encounters, Mira prompts for laterality, fracture characteristics (type, pattern, displacement, open vs. closed), and relevant co-morbidities that downstream coders need to assign the most specific ICD-10 codes and support medical necessity. When a procedure is scheduled, Mira flags whether the H&P on file is within the 30-day CMS window. If it is not, the scribe surfaces an update note template so the treating physician can attest that the patient's condition has been reviewed, any interval changes are documented, and the procedure remains appropriate—satisfying 42 CFR 416.52(a)(1) without a separate manual workflow step. Mira also distinguishes between definitive diagnoses and language that signals a suspected or unconfirmed condition. If the assessment section contains terms like 'probable,' 'suspected,' or 'rule out,' the scribe flags the finding and prompts the physician to clarify, preventing coders from inadvertently assigning a diagnosis code before confirmation is available. This directly reduces the risk of pre-assignment denials and keeps the claim defensible at audit.

See Mira's approach

Related terms

Ready?

Ready to transform your orthopedic practice?

See how orthopedic practices are running documentation, billing, and operations on a single voice-first platform.

Get started for free