Glossary · Coding
MMM (maternity / no global)
MMM is the CMS global surgery indicator assigned to maternity care procedure codes, signifying that the global period concept does not apply in the traditional sense—instead, pre- and post-operative periods are defined by gestational and postpartum weeks rather than a fixed number of days.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓
Definition
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓
The CMS Medicare Physician Fee Schedule assigns every procedure code a global surgery indicator. Most surgical codes carry a 0-, 10-, or 90-day global period. Maternity codes are different: they receive the MMM indicator, which signals that the standard day-count rules are replaced by obstetric-specific time frames tied to pregnancy physiology—roughly 280 days (40 gestational weeks) of antepartum care and up to 42 days (6 weeks) postpartum, depending on the specific code.
In practical terms, MMM means the 'no global' label is a shorthand for 'no ordinary surgical global'—not that there is zero bundling. Full-package codes (e.g., routine obstetric care including antepartum, delivery, and postpartum) bundle an enormous scope of service under one code. Partial or split-billing codes (antepartum-only, delivery-only, postpartum-only) carry narrower MMM windows. When a single provider or group practice with a written on-call agreement furnishes all three phases of care, the complete global OB package code is required; billing the components separately is improper in that scenario.
Beginning January 1, 2027, the AMA is deleting the legacy global OB package codes and replacing them with unbundled evaluation and management codes plus new phase-specific maternity categories. The MMM indicator will still appear on some surviving codes, but the sweeping bundled-package model that defined maternity coding since the mid-1990s will no longer exist. For orthopedic coders who encounter pregnant patients—trauma, spine surgery, fracture care—understanding MMM is critical to avoid inadvertently bundling or denying services that overlap with an active maternity global period.
Why it matters
If an orthopedic surgeon treats a pregnant patient for a covered orthopedic condition (e.g., an acute fracture or post-traumatic spine surgery), payors may incorrectly bundle that claim into the open MMM global period managed by the patient's OB provider, resulting in a denial. Conversely, an orthopedic practice that performs a procedure assigned an MMM indicator—rare but possible in combined service contexts—must understand that the pre- and post-operative bundling windows are governed by gestational weeks, not the 0/10/90-day rules used for every other specialty. Misreading MMM as 'no rules apply' rather than 'different rules apply' is a direct path to underpayment, claim denial, or a payor audit for improper unbundling.
Common mistakes
Where people most often go wrong with this concept.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in cited references ↓
- Treating MMM as meaning 'no global period at all' rather than 'gestational-week-based global period'—the bundling rules still apply within the obstetric episode.
- Billing separate antepartum and postpartum codes when a single provider or same-group practice delivered all phases of care, which requires the full package code instead.
- Failing to recognize that an orthopedic claim for a pregnant patient may be incorrectly cross-denied by a payor applying the active MMM global period—document that the orthopedic service is unrelated to the obstetric episode.
- Assuming the 2027 CPT restructure eliminates all MMM-indicator codes; some delivery and postpartum codes will retain the MMM designation even after the global package codes are deleted.
- Using a 90-day global period calculator for MMM-coded procedures instead of the obstetric pre-op (up to 280 days) and post-op (up to 42 days) windows.
Related codes
Codes commonly involved when this concept appears in practice.
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓
01What does the MMM indicator actually mean on a CMS fee schedule lookup?
02If I'm an orthopedic coder, why do I need to know about MMM?
03Will MMM codes still exist after the 2027 CPT changes?
04When is split billing (non-global maternity) appropriate?
05Does MMM mean there is no bundling at all?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01ama-assn.orghttps://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/cpt/cpt-2027-maternity-care-services-code-changes
- 02acog.orghttps://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2026/04/ama-releases-new-obstetric-codes
- 03blueshieldca.comhttps://www.blueshieldca.com/content/dam/bsca/en/provider/docs/Global-Surgical-Period.pdf
- 04bluecrossnc.comhttps://www.bluecrossnc.com/providers/policies-guidelines-codes/commercial/reimbursement/updates/guidelines-for-global-maternity-reimbursement
- 05healthcaredive.comhttps://www.healthcaredive.com/news/ama-maternity-code-overhaul-pregnancy-obgyn-cpt/813363/
- 06CMS Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Relative Value Files — PFS Relative Value Files | CMS
- 07CMS Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 12, Sections 40.2 & 40.4
Mira AI Scribe
When Mira detects an active maternity episode in the chart alongside an orthopedic encounter, it flags the potential MMM global period conflict and prompts the coder to confirm whether the orthopedic service is clinically distinct and separately reimbursable. For maternity-phase documentation, Mira identifies which phase of care (antepartum, labor management, delivery, postpartum) is being documented and maps it to the correct current code—or, for dates of service on or after January 1, 2027, to the appropriate replacement E/M or phase-specific code. Mira also alerts coders when a full-package OB code is being split into components for a single provider or same-group-practice episode, which is a payor audit trigger. For orthopedic procedures performed on pregnant patients, Mira appends a documentation prompt to explicitly state that the service addresses a condition unrelated to the active obstetric episode, supporting a separate reimbursement argument and reducing cross-denial risk.
See Mira's approach