Glossary · Reimbursement
BPCI Advanced
BPCI Advanced (Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced) is a voluntary CMS episode-based payment model in which a single target price covers all Medicare Part A and B services within a 90-day clinical episode, and participants bear financial risk or reward based on whether actual spending falls below or above that target. It qualifies as an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM) under the Quality Payment Program.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓
Definition
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓
BPCI Advanced, administered by the CMS Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI), replaces the original BPCI initiative that ended September 30, 2018. Instead of paying each provider separately for every service rendered during a hospitalization and its aftermath, CMS sets a prospective target price for the entire 90-day clinical episode—anchored to an inpatient admission or, in later model years, select outpatient procedures. Participating Episode Initiators (EIs)—either acute-care hospitals (ACHs) or physician group practices (PGPs)—become financially accountable for total episode spending. If actual spending beats the target (minus a 3% CMS discount), the EI receives a reconciliation payment; if spending exceeds the target, the EI owes CMS the difference. Target prices are set prospectively before each model year, rebased annually starting in model year 3, and adjusted for case mix.
For orthopedic practices, the most relevant clinical episodes include lower extremity joint replacement (LEJR), which covers both hip and knee arthroplasty, as well as fracture-related episodes. AAOS advocacy secured the addition of outpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as a distinct episode beginning in model year 3 (January 2020), reflecting CMS's 2018 removal of TKA from the Medicare inpatient-only list. Attribution of a clinical episode follows a precedence hierarchy: (1) the PGP whose claim carries the attending physician's NPI, (2) the PGP whose claim carries the operating physician's NPI, and (3) the ACH where the triggering services were furnished.
Quality performance is not optional. Each EI commits annually to either the Administrative Quality Measures Set or the Alternate Quality Measures Set. CMS rolls individual measure scores into a Composite Quality Score (CQS), which then adjusts the final reconciliation amount—capped at ±10% in the first two model years. Because BPCI Advanced qualifies as an Advanced APM, clinicians who meet participation thresholds can earn the QPP incentive bonus and are exempt from MIPS reporting requirements for that performance year, making the quality layer doubly consequential for physician compensation.
Why it matters
Orthopedic surgeons who are Episode Initiators bear direct financial risk: if the care team runs over the 90-day target price—due to excess imaging, prolonged SNF stays, readmissions, or high-cost implants—the reconciliation payment turns negative and the practice or hospital writes a check back to CMS. Conversely, disciplined post-acute utilization and protocol-driven care can generate meaningful shared-savings payments. Separately, participation affects QPP status: qualifying as an Advanced APM shields the surgeon from MIPS penalties and unlocks an incentive bonus, so a coding or attribution error that removes a physician from the BPCI Advanced participant list mid-year can trigger unexpected MIPS exposure and eliminate bonus eligibility retroactively.
Common mistakes
Where people most often go wrong with this concept.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in cited references ↓
- Conflating BPCI Advanced with the original BPCI initiative: they are separate models with different risk structures, target-price methodologies, and episode lists; BPCI ended September 30, 2018.
- Assuming outpatient TKA automatically falls under the LEJR inpatient episode bundle—it does not; CMS added outpatient TKA as a distinct clinical episode only starting in model year 3 (January 2020).
- Ignoring the CJR precedence rule: in mandatory CJR metropolitan areas, the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model takes priority over BPCI Advanced for LEJR episodes, meaning a PGP that believes it is the accountable EI may not actually be attributed the episode.
- Omitting or misreporting the attending or operating physician NPI on claims, which can shift episode attribution away from the intended PGP Episode Initiator and alter reconciliation responsibility.
- Treating the CQS adjustment as immaterial: quality underperformance can shift the reconciliation amount by up to 10% of the target price, which is a real dollar impact on the settlement check.
- Failing to select an Annual Quality Measures Set before the model year begins—late or absent selection can default the participant to the Administrative set and preclude use of the Alternate set's measures.
- Assuming BPCI Advanced participation automatically satisfies Advanced APM requirements without verifying that the clinician meets CMS's minimum payment-amount or patient-count thresholds for QPP purposes.
Related codes
Codes commonly involved when this concept appears in practice.
CPT
- 27447 $1,159.35Knee replacement surgery addressing both the medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartments, with or without resurfacing of the patella.
- 27130 $1,162.02Primary total hip arthroplasty replacing both the acetabular socket and proximal femoral components with prosthetic implants, with or without bone graft.
- 27236 $1,089.87Open treatment of a proximal femoral fracture at the femoral neck, using internal fixation hardware or prosthetic replacement to stabilize the fracture site.
- 27245 $1,118.26Open treatment of an intertrochanteric, peritrochanteric, or subtrochanteric femoral fracture using an intramedullary implant, with or without interlocking screws and/or cerclage.
- 27702 $885.12Total ankle arthroplasty with implant — surgical replacement of the tibiotalar joint using a prosthetic device to eliminate pain and restore motion.
- 27486 $1,274.91Revision of a total knee arthroplasty involving a single component, performed with or without the use of donor bone graft material.
- 27487 $1,574.52Revision total knee arthroplasty with replacement of both the femoral and tibial components, with or without the use of allograft tissue.
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓
01How long is a BPCI Advanced clinical episode?
02What is the CMS discount rate built into the target price?
03Does participating in BPCI Advanced eliminate the need to report MIPS?
04How is a clinical episode attributed when both a PGP and a hospital are involved?
05Is outpatient total knee arthroplasty covered under the LEJR episode bundle?
06What happens if the CJR model and BPCI Advanced both apply to the same patient?
07How often does CMS reconcile payments under BPCI Advanced?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/priorities/innovation/innovation-models/bpci-advanced
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/priorities/innovation/innovation-models/bpci-advanced/participant-resources
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/priorities/innovation/innovation-models/bpci-advanced/quality-measures
- 04aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/contentassets/292dafcca9f94ddb82cebb6a45ed63f4/bpci-advanced-faq.pdf
- 05aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/aaosnow/2019/jun/advocacy/advocacy01/
- 06cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/priorities/innovation/innovation-models/bundled-payments
- 07aha.orghttps://www.aha.org/news/headline/2019-06-24-cms-issues-faqs-bpci-advanced-model
Mira AI Scribe
BPCI Advanced relevance for Mira documentation: When a participating physician group practice (PGP) is the Episode Initiator, the attending and operating physician NPIs on every claim during the 90-day episode window directly control attribution and reconciliation. Mira should verify that the correct NPI is populated in the attending and operating physician fields on all claims—mismatches silently shift the episode to the hospital (ACH) or to a different PGP. For LEJR episodes (CPT 27447, 27130, and related arthroplasty codes), flag whether the site of service is inpatient (POS 21) or outpatient/ASC (POS 24); outpatient TKA triggers the separate outpatient clinical episode shell beginning model year 3. For fracture episodes (e.g., hip fracture open reduction with internal fixation), confirm the ICD-10 principal diagnosis code and trauma laterality, as case-mix adjustments to the target price depend on fracture vs. non-fracture classification. Document the Composite Quality Score measure set selection (Administrative vs. Alternate) at the start of each model year in the practice's payer configuration, so that quality measure documentation prompts align with the committed set. Do not apply BPCI Advanced episode logic in CJR-designated mandatory metropolitan areas for LEJR without confirming CJR precedence does not override attribution. Null out BPCI Advanced episode tracking for any claim in a mandatory CJR market unless CMS has confirmed PGP precedence.
See Mira's approachRelated terms
The Quality Payment Program (QPP) is a CMS value-based reimbursement framework, established under MACRA in 2015 and launched in 2017, that ties Medicare Part B payment adjustments to clinician performance through two tracks: MIPS and Advanced APMs.
MIPS (Merit-based Incentive Payment System) is one of two participation tracks under CMS's Quality Payment Program (QPP), in which eligible clinicians earn a composite performance score across four categories that directly adjusts their Medicare Part B reimbursement—up or down—two years later.
The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) Model is a mandatory Medicare bundled-payment program that holds participating hospitals financially accountable for the total cost and quality of care during hip, knee, and ankle replacement episodes—from the procedure date through 90 days post-discharge.