Glossary · Reimbursement

BPCI Advanced

BPCI Advanced (Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced) is a voluntary CMS episode-based payment model in which a single target price covers all Medicare Part A and B services within a 90-day clinical episode, and participants bear financial risk or reward based on whether actual spending falls below or above that target. It qualifies as an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM) under the Quality Payment Program.

Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓

Drawn from CMSAAOSAha

Definition

Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓

BPCI Advanced, administered by the CMS Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI), replaces the original BPCI initiative that ended September 30, 2018. Instead of paying each provider separately for every service rendered during a hospitalization and its aftermath, CMS sets a prospective target price for the entire 90-day clinical episode—anchored to an inpatient admission or, in later model years, select outpatient procedures. Participating Episode Initiators (EIs)—either acute-care hospitals (ACHs) or physician group practices (PGPs)—become financially accountable for total episode spending. If actual spending beats the target (minus a 3% CMS discount), the EI receives a reconciliation payment; if spending exceeds the target, the EI owes CMS the difference. Target prices are set prospectively before each model year, rebased annually starting in model year 3, and adjusted for case mix.

For orthopedic practices, the most relevant clinical episodes include lower extremity joint replacement (LEJR), which covers both hip and knee arthroplasty, as well as fracture-related episodes. AAOS advocacy secured the addition of outpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as a distinct episode beginning in model year 3 (January 2020), reflecting CMS's 2018 removal of TKA from the Medicare inpatient-only list. Attribution of a clinical episode follows a precedence hierarchy: (1) the PGP whose claim carries the attending physician's NPI, (2) the PGP whose claim carries the operating physician's NPI, and (3) the ACH where the triggering services were furnished.

Quality performance is not optional. Each EI commits annually to either the Administrative Quality Measures Set or the Alternate Quality Measures Set. CMS rolls individual measure scores into a Composite Quality Score (CQS), which then adjusts the final reconciliation amount—capped at ±10% in the first two model years. Because BPCI Advanced qualifies as an Advanced APM, clinicians who meet participation thresholds can earn the QPP incentive bonus and are exempt from MIPS reporting requirements for that performance year, making the quality layer doubly consequential for physician compensation.

Why it matters

Orthopedic surgeons who are Episode Initiators bear direct financial risk: if the care team runs over the 90-day target price—due to excess imaging, prolonged SNF stays, readmissions, or high-cost implants—the reconciliation payment turns negative and the practice or hospital writes a check back to CMS. Conversely, disciplined post-acute utilization and protocol-driven care can generate meaningful shared-savings payments. Separately, participation affects QPP status: qualifying as an Advanced APM shields the surgeon from MIPS penalties and unlocks an incentive bonus, so a coding or attribution error that removes a physician from the BPCI Advanced participant list mid-year can trigger unexpected MIPS exposure and eliminate bonus eligibility retroactively.

Common mistakes

Where people most often go wrong with this concept.

Source · Editorial brief grounded in cited references ↓

  • Conflating BPCI Advanced with the original BPCI initiative: they are separate models with different risk structures, target-price methodologies, and episode lists; BPCI ended September 30, 2018.
  • Assuming outpatient TKA automatically falls under the LEJR inpatient episode bundle—it does not; CMS added outpatient TKA as a distinct clinical episode only starting in model year 3 (January 2020).
  • Ignoring the CJR precedence rule: in mandatory CJR metropolitan areas, the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model takes priority over BPCI Advanced for LEJR episodes, meaning a PGP that believes it is the accountable EI may not actually be attributed the episode.
  • Omitting or misreporting the attending or operating physician NPI on claims, which can shift episode attribution away from the intended PGP Episode Initiator and alter reconciliation responsibility.
  • Treating the CQS adjustment as immaterial: quality underperformance can shift the reconciliation amount by up to 10% of the target price, which is a real dollar impact on the settlement check.
  • Failing to select an Annual Quality Measures Set before the model year begins—late or absent selection can default the participant to the Administrative set and preclude use of the Alternate set's measures.
  • Assuming BPCI Advanced participation automatically satisfies Advanced APM requirements without verifying that the clinician meets CMS's minimum payment-amount or patient-count thresholds for QPP purposes.

Related codes

Codes commonly involved when this concept appears in practice.

Frequently asked questions

Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓

01How long is a BPCI Advanced clinical episode?
Each clinical episode spans 90 days, beginning with the qualifying inpatient admission or, for select episodes added in later model years, the qualifying outpatient procedure date.
02What is the CMS discount rate built into the target price?
CMS applies a 3% discount when setting target prices, meaning participants must beat fee-for-service spending by at least 3% just to break even at reconciliation.
03Does participating in BPCI Advanced eliminate the need to report MIPS?
Clinicians who meet the Advanced APM participation thresholds under the Quality Payment Program are excluded from MIPS reporting and penalties for that performance year, and they become eligible for the Advanced APM incentive bonus. Participation alone is not sufficient—the clinician must cross CMS's minimum payment-amount or patient-count thresholds.
04How is a clinical episode attributed when both a PGP and a hospital are involved?
BPCI Advanced uses a strict precedence hierarchy: a PGP submitting a claim with the attending physician's NPI takes priority, followed by a PGP with the operating physician's NPI, and lastly the acute-care hospital where services were furnished.
05Is outpatient total knee arthroplasty covered under the LEJR episode bundle?
Not automatically. CMS added outpatient TKA as a separate clinical episode starting in model year 3 (January 2020). Before that, LEJR in BPCI Advanced covered only inpatient episodes, so outpatient TKA procedures fell outside the bundle entirely.
06What happens if the CJR model and BPCI Advanced both apply to the same patient?
CJR takes precedence over BPCI Advanced for LEJR episodes in mandatory CJR metropolitan areas. The hospital becomes the accountable party under CJR regardless of whether a PGP is enrolled in BPCI Advanced, which can eliminate a surgeon group's ability to earn reconciliation payments for those cases.
07How often does CMS reconcile payments under BPCI Advanced?
Reconciliation occurs semiannually. CMS compares actual episode spending against the prospective target price, applies any CQS adjustment, and issues either a payment to the participant or a recoupment bill.

Mira AI Scribe

BPCI Advanced relevance for Mira documentation: When a participating physician group practice (PGP) is the Episode Initiator, the attending and operating physician NPIs on every claim during the 90-day episode window directly control attribution and reconciliation. Mira should verify that the correct NPI is populated in the attending and operating physician fields on all claims—mismatches silently shift the episode to the hospital (ACH) or to a different PGP. For LEJR episodes (CPT 27447, 27130, and related arthroplasty codes), flag whether the site of service is inpatient (POS 21) or outpatient/ASC (POS 24); outpatient TKA triggers the separate outpatient clinical episode shell beginning model year 3. For fracture episodes (e.g., hip fracture open reduction with internal fixation), confirm the ICD-10 principal diagnosis code and trauma laterality, as case-mix adjustments to the target price depend on fracture vs. non-fracture classification. Document the Composite Quality Score measure set selection (Administrative vs. Alternate) at the start of each model year in the practice's payer configuration, so that quality measure documentation prompts align with the committed set. Do not apply BPCI Advanced episode logic in CJR-designated mandatory metropolitan areas for LEJR without confirming CJR precedence does not override attribution. Null out BPCI Advanced episode tracking for any claim in a mandatory CJR market unless CMS has confirmed PGP precedence.

See Mira's approach

Related terms

Ready?

Ready to transform your orthopedic practice?

See how orthopedic practices are running documentation, billing, and operations on a single voice-first platform.

Get started for free