Evaluation & management · General

97162

Moderate-complexity physical therapy evaluation requiring documented history with one to two comorbidities or personal factors, examination of three or more body system elements with measurable findings, and moderate clinical decision-making for an evolving presentation — typically 30 minutes face-to-face.

Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓

Medicare
$97.86
Total RVUs
2.93
Global, days
Region
General
Drawn from CMSMedsolercmAAPC

Documentation requirements

What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.

Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓

  • Patient history documenting one to two comorbidities or personal/environmental factors that affect care
  • Examination of three or more body structure and function elements with measurable, standardized test results
  • Clinical decision-making narrative showing moderate complexity appropriate to an evolving or changing presentation
  • Modifier GP appended to the claim line for Medicare to indicate service is under a PT plan of care
  • Standardized outcome or assessment tools used and results recorded by name in the note
  • Face-to-face time with patient and/or family documented when time-based support is needed

Applicable modifiers

Modifiers commonly billed with this code.

Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual

What this code covers

Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓

97162 is the middle tier of the three-level PT evaluation series (97161–97163). It requires all three complexity pillars to be met: a patient history that captures one or two comorbidities or personal/environmental factors affecting care; a physical examination of three or more body structure and function elements — such as joint mobility, muscle strength, gait, or neuromuscular function — documented with measurable outcomes; and moderate clinical decision-making appropriate for a presentation that is evolving or changing in character. Standardized tests and measures must be used. Miss any pillar and the note supports 97161, not 97162.

For Medicare, modifier GP is required on every 97162 claim line to indicate the service was rendered under a physical therapy plan of care. Without GP, the claim processes incorrectly or rejects outright. The code carries a XXX global period, meaning standard surgical global rules don't apply — therapy-specific coverage rules govern instead.

An NCCI Procedure-to-Procedure edit exists between 97162 and 97140 (manual therapy). Billing both on the same date without a modifier triggers automatic denial of 97140. Modifier 59 (or an appropriate X-modifier) appended to 97140 bypasses the edit — but only when the documentation shows the manual therapy served a distinct clinical purpose separate from the evaluation itself. Audit teams look for notes that use modifier 59 as a reflex rather than a supported clinical distinction.

RVU & reimbursement

Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.

Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026

Work RVU1.54
Practice expense RVU1.38
Malpractice RVU0.01
Total RVU2.93
Medicare national rate$97.86
Global perioddays

Payment by site of service

Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.

Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026

SettingMedicare rate (national)
Office (PFS non-facility)
Procedure performed in physician's office
$97.86

Common denial reasons

The recurring reasons claims for CPT 97162 get rejected.

Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓

  • Missing modifier GP on Medicare claims — claim processes incorrectly or rejects without it
  • Documentation supports only one comorbidity/factor and fewer than three examination elements, downgrading to 97161
  • 97140 billed same-day without modifier 59 or X-modifier — NCCI PTP edit auto-denies the 97140 line
  • Billing 97162 alongside 97750 (physical performance test) on the same date — CMS treats the assessment as inclusive within the evaluation
  • Upcoding flag: note describes a straightforward, stable presentation with no evolving clinical factors, which does not meet moderate complexity criteria

Frequently asked questions

Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓

01What separates 97162 from 97161 and 97163?
97161 (low) requires examination of one to two body system elements and straightforward clinical decision-making. 97162 (moderate) requires three or more elements and moderate decision-making for an evolving presentation. 97163 (high) requires four or more elements, high complexity decision-making, and typically involves three or more comorbidities or personal factors. If your note doesn't clearly document the tier-defining elements, bill down — not up.
02Is modifier GP always required for Medicare billing of 97162?
Yes. CMS requires modifier GP on all physical therapy evaluation claims for Medicare to indicate the service is provided under a physical therapy plan of care. Omitting GP causes the claim to process under the wrong benefit category or reject entirely. Most commercial payers don't require GP, but verify with each payer before omitting it.
03Can you bill 97162 and 97140 on the same date?
Yes, but you must append modifier 59 (or an appropriate X-modifier) to 97140. The NCCI PTP edit bundles the two codes together; the modifier signals a distinct service. Your documentation must show the manual therapy addressed a separate clinical purpose from the evaluation — not just that both happened during the same visit.
04Does 97162 follow the 8-minute rule?
No. The 8-minute rule applies to timed therapeutic procedure codes. 97162 is an evaluation code billed once per evaluation encounter regardless of how many minutes were spent. It is not billed in units.
05Can an orthopedic surgeon or PM&R physician bill 97162, or is it PT-only?
Non-PT providers, including orthopedic surgeons and PM&R physicians, can bill 97162 when they perform a physical therapy evaluation within their scope. In practice it is dominated by physical therapists in private practice settings. When a physician bills it, payers may scrutinize whether the service is distinct from an E/M visit billed the same day — use modifier 25 on the E/M if both are documented as separate encounters.
06What standardized tests satisfy the 97162 documentation requirement?
Any validated, reproducible outcome measure qualifies — examples include the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), DASH for upper extremity, Timed Up and Go (TUG), or manual muscle testing grades. The key requirement is that results are recorded with specific values, not described in general terms like 'strength mildly reduced.'

Mira AI Scribe

Mira's AI scribe captures the specific comorbidities and personal factors noted in the patient history, names each body structure and function element examined with its measured value, records the standardized assessment tool used and score, and documents the therapist's clinical reasoning for why the presentation is evolving or changing. That structured capture prevents the most common audit flag for 97162: a note that describes findings but omits the complexity rationale needed to distinguish this code from 97161.

See how Mira captures CPT 97162 documentation

Related CPT codes

Ready?

Ready to transform your orthopedic practice?

See how orthopedic practices are running documentation, billing, and operations on a single voice-first platform.

Get started for free