Ischemic limb exercise test with serial specimen collection for muscle metabolite analysis
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $128.59
- Total RVUs
- 3.85
- Global, days
- Region
- General
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Indication for testing: specific symptom complex (exercise-induced cramping, weakness, myoglobinuria) driving clinical suspicion of metabolic myopathy
- Documentation of ischemic condition induction method and the exercise protocol used (e.g., forearm squeeze against resistance)
- Serial specimen acquisition log: time points at which blood draws were obtained relative to exercise
- Metabolite results reported: lactate and ammonia levels at each time point, with interpretation comparing expected vs. observed response
- Ordering physician attestation or supervising physician presence per applicable incident-to or direct supervision rules
- ICD-10 diagnosis code(s) supported by clinical presentation — medical necessity must be established in the note before the test is ordered
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 95875 describes an ischemic limb exercise test in which the patient performs exercise under artificially induced ischemic conditions while serial blood specimens are drawn to measure muscle metabolites. The most common application is the ischemic forearm exercise test, used to diagnose McArdle disease (glycogen storage disease type V) and other metabolic myopathies by assessing whether lactate and ammonia rise appropriately after exercise. The test belongs to the ischemic muscle testing family under Neurology and Neuromuscular Procedures.
Orthopedic surgeons encounter this code when evaluating patients with exercise-induced myalgia, cramping, or weakness that cannot be explained by structural pathology. A positive result — failure of lactate to rise with normal ammonia rise — points to a glycogenolytic defect. A flat ammonia curve alongside flat lactate suggests a purine nucleotide cycle defect. These distinctions drive ICD-10 diagnosis coding and downstream metabolic specialist referrals.
Global period is XXX, meaning standard surgical global rules do not apply and the service is billed on the date performed without global bundling concerns. The code carries a facility-site payment under the HOPD fee schedule; there is no ASC payment rate assigned.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 1.07 |
| Practice expense RVU | 2.73 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.05 |
| Total RVU | 3.85 |
| Medicare national rate | $128.59 |
| Global period | days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $128.59 |
HOPD (APC 5721) Hospital outpatient department | $131.46 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 95875 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Lack of medical necessity documentation — payers require documented clinical suspicion of metabolic myopathy; vague 'muscle pain' without workup context triggers denial
- Missing or inadequate serial specimen log — insurers audit whether multiple draws were actually performed as the code describes
- ICD-10 mismatch — billing a nonspecific musculoskeletal diagnosis instead of a metabolic or neuromuscular code inconsistent with the procedure purpose
- Supervision level not met — if performed by ancillary staff without documented physician direct supervision where required by payer policy
- Duplicate claim or unbundling of specimen handling charges billed separately without appropriate modifiers or justification
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01Which diagnoses support medical necessity for CPT 95875?
02Can 95875 be billed the same day as EMG or nerve conduction studies?
03Is 95875 subject to a global period?
04Does Medicare cover 95875 for McArdle disease workup in orthopedic patients?
05What level of physician supervision is required when ancillary staff performs the test?
06Why does 95875 appear in orthopedic billing data if it's a neuromuscular code?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/95875
- 03vsac.nlm.nih.govhttps://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/context/cs/codesystem/CPT/version/2021/code/95875/info
- 04payerprice.comhttps://payerprice.com/rates/95875-CPT-fee-schedule
- 05cgsmedicare.comhttps://www.cgsmedicare.com/medicare_dynamic/j15/partb/ptpb/ptp.aspx
- 06cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/article.aspx?articleId=54992
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the clinical indication (specific symptoms prompting metabolic myopathy workup), the ischemic induction method, the exercise protocol, and the exact time points of serial specimen collection from dictation. It flags if lactate and ammonia interpretation language is absent from the note — the most common reason payers reclassify this as a simple venipuncture rather than reimbursing the full ischemic exercise test.
See how Mira captures CPT 95875 documentation