CT scan of the upper extremity (arm, forearm, wrist, elbow, or shoulder) performed without contrast material.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $160.66
- Total RVUs
- 4.81
- Global, days
- Region
- Other
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Radiology report must explicitly state 'without contrast' — technique documentation alone is insufficient for code selection
- Clinical indication or ordering diagnosis must be documented and linked to a supporting ICD-10 code on the claim
- Specify which anatomic segment of the upper extremity was imaged (e.g., elbow, forearm, wrist) in the report header
- If bilateral studies are performed, document medical necessity for each side separately; use LT/RT modifiers on separate claim lines
- Interpreting physician's signature and date must appear on the final report to support professional component billing
- If modifier 26 is appended, the ordering and interpreting physician must be distinct from the facility providing the technical service
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 73200 covers a computed tomography scan of the upper extremity acquired without the use of contrast dye. It applies to any segment of the upper limb — shoulder, arm, elbow, forearm, wrist, or hand — when the clinical question can be answered without IV contrast. Common indications include cortical bone detail, fracture assessment, osseous tumor evaluation, and pre-operative planning where soft-tissue enhancement is not required.
When contrast is needed, bill 73201 instead. When the study begins without contrast and then adds contrast, bill 73202. Choosing the wrong code in the trilogy is the most common coding error on upper extremity CT. The contrast status must be documented in the radiology order and the final report — not inferred from the technique section alone.
For orthopedic surgeons ordering and interpreting in-office or IDTF settings, the professional component (modifier 26) and technical component (TC) split applies. Surgeons billing only the read — for example, reviewing a study acquired at a hospital — append modifier 26. Global billing applies only when the practice owns the equipment and employs the technical staff. The bilateral payment indicator for 73200 means Medicare pays 100% of the fee schedule for each side when performed bilaterally, not the 150% rule that applies to surgical procedures.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 0.98 |
| Practice expense RVU | 3.75 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.08 |
| Total RVU | 4.81 |
| Medicare national rate | $160.66 |
| Global period | days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $160.66 |
HOPD (APC 5522) Hospital outpatient department | $106.81 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 73200 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Wrong contrast code selected — 73201 or 73202 billed when documentation supports a without-contrast-only study
- Missing or unsupported ICD-10 diagnosis — payers deny when the clinical indication doesn't align with the imaged body part
- Unbundling the CT guidance code when 73200 was ordered specifically to guide a same-session interventional procedure integral to that procedure
- Professional component billed globally by a surgeon who does not own the imaging equipment or employ technical staff
- Bilateral claim submitted without LT/RT modifiers or without separate medical necessity documentation for each side
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between 73200, 73201, and 73202?
02When should an orthopedic surgeon append modifier 26 to 73200?
03Can 73200 be billed bilaterally, and how?
04Is 73200 separately billable when ordered to guide a same-session procedure?
05What ICD-10 codes are commonly paired with 73200 in orthopedic settings?
06Does 73200 have a global period?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/09-chapter9-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 04medlearn.comhttps://medlearn.com/understanding-upper-extremity-ct-coding/
- 05aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/73200
- 06mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/73200
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the contrast status, anatomic segment imaged, and clinical indication directly from dictation — the three fields most likely to cause a code mismatch denial. When a surgeon dictates a post-study interpretation, the scribe flags whether the note supports global billing or professional-component-only billing based on the setting documented, preventing the most common 73200 overpayment audit trigger.
See how Mira captures CPT 73200 documentation