MRI of the lumbar spinal canal and its contents performed first without contrast, then repeated after contrast administration for enhanced visualization.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $318.31
- Total RVUs
- 9.53
- Global, days
- Region
- Spine
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Clinical indication specifying why contrast is medically necessary, not just why lumbar MRI is ordered
- Documentation of prior conservative treatment or failed non-contrast imaging when required by payer policy
- Radiology report confirming two-phase acquisition: pre-contrast sequences and post-contrast sequences with gadolinium
- Ordering provider's documented clinical findings or diagnosis supporting the specific ICD-10 codes submitted with the claim
- Contrast agent administered, dose, and route documented in the procedure or radiology report
- For IDTF billing: radiologist supervision documented and MR technologist credentials on file
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
72158 is the correct code when a lumbar spine MRI is performed as a two-phase study: non-contrast sequences first, followed by gadolinium injection and additional contrast-enhanced sequences. It is not interchangeable with 72148 (without contrast only) or 72149 (with contrast only). If a radiologist reads 72148 and 72149 billed from separate same-day encounters, payers will typically bundle them and expect 72158 instead.
Contrast-enhanced lumbar MRI is clinically indicated when post-surgical evaluation is needed (distinguishing recurrent disc herniation from epidural fibrosis), when infection, tumor, or vascular pathology is suspected, or when myelopathy findings require more detail than non-contrast sequences provide. Payers applying the CMS LCD for lumbar MRI (A57207) require the ordering diagnosis to support medical necessity for contrast specifically — not just for lumbar spine imaging in general.
At IDTFs, CMS requires a radiologist for physician supervision and an ARRT-credentialed MR technologist (R.T.-MR or ARMRIT-RT-MR) for technical performance. Modifier 26 isolates the professional component when the radiologist bills interpretation separately from a facility technical bill. Billing the global service from a non-facility setting requires both components to be performed and documented by the same group.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 2.23 |
| Practice expense RVU | 7.14 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.16 |
| Total RVU | 9.53 |
| Medicare national rate | $318.31 |
| Global period | days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $318.31 |
HOPD (APC 5572) Hospital outpatient department | $356.43 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 72158 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Medical necessity denied because the submitted ICD-10 code supports non-contrast imaging only, not the with-and-without contrast study
- Duplicate claim denial when 72148 and 72149 are billed separately for a single same-day two-phase study instead of 72158
- Missing prior authorization for contrast-enhanced MRI, which many commercial payers require separately from non-contrast lumbar MRI
- Radiology report does not confirm both pre-contrast and post-contrast sequences were performed, making the upgrade to 72158 unsupported
- IDTF claim denied for failure to meet physician supervision or technologist credential requirements per CMS Article A54953
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01Can I bill 72148 and 72149 together when a lumbar MRI is done with and without contrast on the same day?
02What modifier do I use when billing only the radiologist's interpretation of a 72158?
03Which ICD-10 codes support medical necessity for 72158 specifically versus 72148?
04Does 72158 require prior authorization?
05What are the technologist credential requirements for billing 72158 from an IDTF?
06Is modifier 59 ever appropriate with 72158?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/article.aspx?articleid=57207&ver=29&
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/article.aspx?articleid=54953&ver=67&
- 03aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/72158
- 04molinamarketplace.comhttps://www.molinamarketplace.com/marketplace/tx/en-us/Providers/Policies/-/media/Molina/PublicWebsite/PDF/providers/tx/Marketplace/Policy/LumbarSpineMRI.pdf
- 05CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the clinical rationale for contrast from dictation — post-surgical evaluation, suspected infection, tumor, or vascular lesion — and flags when only a generic 'low back pain' indication is documented. That prevents the most common 72158 denial: a diagnosis that supports 72148 but not the contrast-enhanced study. The scribe also tags two-phase acquisition confirmation so the radiology report language aligns with the billed code.
See how Mira captures CPT 72158 documentation