Surgical implantation of a permanent laminectomy electrode array for spinal cord stimulation, performed via open exposure of the epidural space.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $838.70
- Total RVUs
- 25.11
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Spine
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Confirm the patient completed a successful SCS trial prior to permanent implant (trial-to-permanent ratio is subject to post-payment review)
- Operative note must specify open surgical approach, laminectomy or laminotomy level(s), and epidural electrode placement
- Radiologic imaging (fluoroscopy or equivalent) confirming proper lead placement must be in the record, even though it is not billed separately
- Diagnosis supporting chronic intractable pain must be documented and linked to covered ICD-10 codes per the applicable LCD
- Document that the procedure was performed in an ASC, outpatient hospital, or inpatient hospital — office setting is not covered for 63655
- If replacing a percutaneous lead with a paddle lead, document removal of prior lead (63661) and rationale for conversion in the operative note
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
63655 covers permanent placement of a paddle (laminectomy) electrode array for spinal cord stimulation. Unlike percutaneous lead placement (63650), this code requires open surgical exposure — a laminectomy or laminotomy — to position the electrode array in the epidural space. It is billed once per patient per lifetime under Medicare and must be performed in an ASC, outpatient hospital, or inpatient hospital; it cannot be billed in an office setting.
Fluoroscopy is inherent to the procedure. NCCI edits prohibit billing imaging guidance separately with 63655 — don't append a fluoroscopy code. Similarly, code 95970 (electronic analysis/interrogation of the neurostimulator) is integral to lead implantation and cannot be reported separately on the same date. The 90-day global period covers all routine post-operative management through day 90; unrelated E/M services in that window require modifier 79 or 24 as appropriate.
When a permanent percutaneous lead is removed (63661) and replaced with a new paddle lead via fresh laminectomy at the same or different spinal level, 63655 is reported alongside 63661 — NCCI edits allow this combination without a modifier. For non-Medicare payers billing multiple leads, contact the payer directly; Medicare MUE allows only 1 unit of 63655 per date of service.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 10.65 |
| Practice expense RVU | 10.63 |
| Malpractice RVU | 3.83 |
| Total RVU | 25.11 |
| Medicare national rate | $838.70 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $838.70 |
HOPD (APC 5464) Hospital outpatient department | $19,820.31 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $14,405.66 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 63655 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Billing site of service as office — 63655 is not payable in the office under Medicare
- Unbundling fluoroscopy (e.g., 77003) separately — NCCI edits bundle imaging guidance into 63655
- Submitting more than 1 unit on the same date of service — Medicare MUE is 1 unit; excess units will deny
- Missing or inadequate documentation of a successful prior SCS trial, triggering medical necessity denial
- Billing 95970 separately on the same date — electronic analysis is integral to lead implantation and not separately payable
- Low trial-to-permanent implant ratio (below 50%) flagging the claim for post-payment review and potential recoupment
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01Can 63655 be billed in an office setting?
02Can fluoroscopy be billed separately with 63655?
03How many times can 63655 be billed per patient?
04What happens if the trial-to-permanent implant ratio falls below 50%?
05Can 63655 and 63661 be billed together when converting a percutaneous lead to a paddle lead?
06Is 95970 separately billable on the same day as 63655?
07What modifier applies if a surgeon performs an unrelated procedure during the 90-day global period?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/article.aspx?articleId=57792&ver=12
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/article.aspx?articleid=56876&ver=18&
- 03member.aanlcp.orghttps://member.aanlcp.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-for-Chronic-Pain-of-the-Trunk-or-Limbs-Reimbursement-Guide.pdf
- 04asra.comhttps://asra.com/the-asra-family/special-interest-groups/sig-article-item/asra-news/2019/05/01/medical-necessity-documentation-coding-and-billing-for-spinal-cord-stimulation
- 05CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the surgical approach (laminectomy vs. laminotomy), spinal level(s) exposed, electrode array type (paddle), epidural placement confirmation, and the prior successful trial date from dictation. That documentation chain directly prevents medical necessity denials and post-payment recoupment tied to inadequate trial documentation.
See how Mira captures CPT 63655 documentation