Surgical · Spine

63267

Laminectomy-based removal of an extradural lesion located in the lumbar spine, accessing the intraspinal space by resecting the posterior bony arch.

Verified May 8, 2026 · 8 sources ↓

Medicare
$1,322.68
Total RVUs
39.6
Global, days
90
Region
Spine
Drawn from CMSAAPC

Documentation requirements

What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.

Source · Editorial brief grounded in 8 cited references ↓

  • Specify the lumbar level(s) operated on (e.g., L3-L4) — generic 'lumbar' without level identification is an audit flag.
  • Identify the lesion type by name (synovial cyst, epidural hematoma, abscess, tumor deposit, etc.) with pathology or intraoperative confirmation noted.
  • Describe the laminectomy approach explicitly — partial vs. complete laminectomy, bone removal extent, and laterality if applicable.
  • Document extradural location of the lesion; intradural involvement changes the code family entirely and must be addressed or excluded.
  • Include pre-op imaging correlation (MRI or CT) linking the identified lesion to the operative level.
  • Record whether the lesion was adherent to the dura, and if so, how dural integrity was managed — critical for distinguishing extradural from intradural codes.
  • Note any neurological status pre- and post-decompression to support medical necessity for this high-complexity procedure.

Applicable modifiers

Modifiers commonly billed with this code.

Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual

What this code covers

Source · Editorial summary grounded in 8 cited references ↓

63267 covers removal of an extradural intraspinal lesion at the lumbar level via laminectomy. The surgeon resects the posterior vertebral arch to expose the epidural space, then excises the abnormal tissue — commonly a synovial cyst, epidural abscess, hematoma, or metastatic deposit. The approach distinguishes this code from intradural lesion codes (63275–63278) and from the thoracic (63266) and sacral (63268) extradural counterparts.

This code carries a 90-day global period. All routine postoperative management, wound checks, and dressing changes through day 90 are bundled. Unrelated E/M services or new problems surfacing in that window require modifier 24. A staged or planned return to the OR for a related issue needs modifier 78; an unrelated return needs modifier 79.

CMS designates 63267 as an inpatient-only procedure under the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System. It cannot be billed in an ASC or HOPD outpatient setting — it must be performed in an inpatient hospital. Operative microscope use (69990) is bundled by NCCI into this procedure for Medicare and cannot be separately reported unless the MAC specifically permits it via modifier 22 on the primary code when microsurgery drives substantially increased complexity.

RVU & reimbursement

Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.

Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026

Work RVU18.96
Practice expense RVU13.93
Malpractice RVU6.71
Total RVU39.6
Medicare national rate$1,322.68
Global period90 days

Payment by site of service

Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.

Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026

SettingMedicare rate (national)
Office (PFS non-facility)
Procedure performed in physician's office
$1,322.68
HOPD (APC 5114)
Hospital outpatient department
$7,413.38
ASC (PI G2)
Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding)
$3,695.53

Common denial reasons

The recurring reasons claims for CPT 63267 get rejected.

Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓

  • Billed in an outpatient or ASC setting — 63267 is CMS inpatient-only; site-of-service mismatch results in automatic non-payment under HOPD rules.
  • Diagnosis code doesn't support an extradural intraspinal lesion — using a herniated disc ICD-10 code (e.g., M51.x) when the procedure is for a cyst or mass triggers medical necessity review.
  • Operative note says 'standard laminectomy approach' without naming the lesion type or confirming extradural position — payers and auditors cannot validate the correct code.
  • 69990 billed separately for operating microscope use — NCCI bundles this into 63267 for Medicare; unbundled claims deny without prior MAC-level justification.
  • Global period violation — post-op E/M visits billed within 90 days without modifier 24 or 25 are denied as included services.
  • Insufficient imaging or pathology documentation to confirm a distinct resectable lesion rather than routine decompressive laminectomy.

Frequently asked questions

Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 8 cited references ↓

01Can 63267 be performed in an ASC or hospital outpatient department?
No. CMS designates 63267 as inpatient-only under HOPD rules. It must be billed as an inpatient hospital service. Submitting it with a place of service 22 or in an ASC setting will result in non-payment under the OPPS.
02What separates 63267 from 63275 or 63277 (spinal tumor biopsy/excision codes)?
63267 is for extradural lesions removed via laminectomy — cysts, abscesses, hematomas, metastatic epidural deposits. Codes 63275–63278 cover biopsy or excision of spinal cord tumors and span intradural and extradural distinctions by level. If you're removing a primary spinal cord tumor, you're in the 63275 family. If you're excising an extradural mass compressing the cord at the lumbar level, 63267 is correct.
03How do you code a lumbar synovial cyst resection — 63267 or a decompression code?
If the synovial cyst is adherent to the dura and is formally resected, 63267 is appropriate. The operative note must state the cyst was identified, dissected, and excised — not simply decompressed incidentally. AAPC forum guidance and AANS recommendations align on this: document adherence to the dura and the resection technique explicitly.
04Can you bill 63267 with a fusion code (e.g., 22612) on the same day?
Yes, if both procedures are medically necessary and documented independently. Modifier 51 applies to the secondary procedure. Ensure the operative note addresses each procedure's indication separately — a single clinical indication that drives both will face scrutiny for unbundling.
05Is modifier 62 (two surgeons) applicable to 63267?
Yes, if a neurosurgeon and orthopedic spine surgeon each perform distinct portions of the procedure and both document their specific contributions. Both surgeons bill 63267-62, and each typically receives approximately 62.5% of the allowed amount. The operative note must reflect co-surgeon roles — not just both names on the report.
06What modifier applies if the patient returns to the OR within the 90-day global for a wound infection at the same site?
Modifier 78 — unplanned return to the OR for a complication related to the original procedure within the global period. The wound infection is related to the 63267 surgery. Modifier 79 would be incorrect here; reserve 79 for a truly unrelated procedure in the global window.
07Does fluoroscopy used for level localization during 63267 need a separate code?
No. Per NCCI policy, when radiologic guidance — including fluoroscopy — is integral to a spinal surgical procedure, it cannot be separately reported. Do not add 77003 or 76000 to a 63267 claim.

Mira AI Scribe

Mira's AI scribe captures the lumbar level, lesion type and location (extradural confirmed), laminectomy extent, dural status, and pre-op imaging correlation directly from surgeon dictation. This prevents the two most common audit triggers for 63267: operative notes that omit the lesion's extradural position and those that fail to name the pathology — both of which invite downcoding or medical necessity denial.

See how Mira captures CPT 63267 documentation

Related CPT codes

Ready?

Ready to transform your orthopedic practice?

See how orthopedic practices are running documentation, billing, and operations on a single voice-first platform.

Get started for free