Lumbar spinal cord and nerve root decompression via transpedicular approach, single segment, including transfacet or lateral extraforaminal variants for far lateral disc herniations.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $1,404.84
- Total RVUs
- 42.06
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Spine
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 7 cited references ↓
- Specify the exact lumbar level(s) treated (e.g., L4-L5) and confirm single-segment approach in the operative note
- Name the surgical approach explicitly — transpedicular, transfacet, or lateral extraforaminal — not just 'standard approach'
- Describe the compressive pathology addressed (e.g., far lateral disc herniation, foraminal stenosis) with correlation to preoperative imaging
- Document intraoperative findings including degree of neural element compression and decompression achieved
- If fluoroscopy was used for localization, note it as part of the procedure rather than billing it separately
- For bilateral or multi-level decompression, document each level distinctly to support any additional-segment add-on codes
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓
63056 covers a single-segment lumbar decompression performed through a transpedicular corridor — approaching the pathology from the side of the pedicle rather than through a standard posterior midline laminectomy. The technique is designed to relieve pressure on the spinal cord, cauda equina, or nerve roots caused by a herniated intervertebral disc or similar compressive pathology. The code explicitly includes transfacet and lateral extraforaminal approaches, making it the correct choice when a far lateral disc herniation requires access outside the spinal canal.
The 90-day global period means all routine follow-up through day 90 is bundled. Separate E/M visits during the global require modifier 24 for unrelated conditions or modifier 57 for a new surgical decision made during a pre-op visit. Intraoperative fluoroscopy is not separately billable; it is bundled into the procedure. If neuromonitoring is performed by a separate provider, that is billed independently.
A hard NCCI PTP edit prohibits reporting 63056 with 22630 (posterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis) at the same spinal level in the same encounter. Modifier 59 or XS can only bypass this edit if the two procedures are documented at different spinal levels. Neurosurgery and orthopedic surgery account for the overwhelming majority of 63056 volume per CMS PUF data.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 21.31 |
| Practice expense RVU | 13.59 |
| Malpractice RVU | 7.16 |
| Total RVU | 42.06 |
| Medicare national rate | $1,404.84 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $1,404.84 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI G2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,695.53 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 63056 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- NCCI PTP edit fires when 63056 is billed with 22630 at the same spinal level without documentation of separate levels
- Operative note lacks a named surgical approach, triggering medical record audit and potential downcoding
- Missing correlation between documented intraoperative level and preoperative imaging diagnosis in the record
- Global period violation — post-op E/M billed without modifier 24 or 25 within the 90-day window
- Wrong code selection when a standard posterior midline laminectomy was performed instead of a transpedicular or extraforaminal approach
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between 63056 and 63030?
02Can I bill 63056 and 22630 together if I perform both at the same level?
03How do I bill if the far lateral disc herniation required a bilateral approach?
04Is fluoroscopy separately billable with 63056?
05What modifier is needed for a related return to the OR during the 90-day global?
06Can a PA or NP be billed as assistant-at-surgery on 63056?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 03medicaid.govhttps://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/program-integrity/downloads/nccimanual2022-chaptereight.pdf
- 04uhcprovider.comhttps://www.uhcprovider.com/content/dam/provider/docs/public/policies/comm-medical-drug/spinal-fusion-decompression.pdf
- 05medtronic.comhttps://www.medtronic.com/content/dam/medtronic-wide/public/united-states/customer-support-services/reimbursement/spinal-procedures-billing-and-coding-guide.pdf
- 06cgsmedicare.comhttps://www.cgsmedicare.com/medicare_dynamic/j15/partb/ptpb/ptp.aspx
- 07aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/63056
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the surgical approach by name (transpedicular, transfacet, or lateral extraforaminal), the specific lumbar level treated, the compressive pathology encountered, and the surgeon's description of neural element decompression — all from dictation. That prevents the two most common audit flags: an operative note that says 'standard approach' and a missing level-to-diagnosis link that payers use to justify medical necessity denials.
See how Mira captures CPT 63056 documentation