Arthroscopic surgical procedure on the subtalar joint that includes fusion (arthrodesis) of the joint surfaces using bone graft and internal fixation.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $819.99
- Total RVUs
- 24.55
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Operative note must specify arthroscopic approach and portal placement — do not write 'standard approach'
- Document the joint surface preparation method (cartilage removal technique, drilling or microfracture of subchondral bone)
- Identify bone graft source and type (autograft, allograft, synthetic) and how it was placed
- Name and describe all fixation hardware used (screw size, number, configuration)
- State the diagnosis driving the fusion — arthritis, post-traumatic deformity, chronic instability, etc. — with supporting imaging
- If modifier 22 is appended, quantify additional work and intraoperative findings that made the case more complex than typical
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 29907 covers an arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis — a minimally invasive approach to fusing the talocalcaneal joint. The surgeon accesses the joint through small portals, removes articular cartilage from the joint surfaces, places bone graft material, and stabilizes the construct with screws or other fixation. The arthroscopic approach is distinct from open subtalar fusion; documentation must specify the arthroscopic technique and the fixation method used.
The code carries a 90-day global period. All routine post-op visits, wound checks, and cast or boot changes through day 90 are bundled. Any unrelated procedure in that window needs modifier 79; a return to the OR for a complication related to the fusion requires modifier 78. Fluoroscopy used intraoperatively to confirm screw placement is integral to the arthroscopic procedure and is not separately billable under NCCI policy.
Site-of-service matters here: HOPD and ASC facility payments differ substantially (see the Site of Service comparison table). When performed bilaterally in a single session, bill on two lines with modifiers LT and RT in the ASC setting; hospital outpatient follows the single-line modifier 50 convention. If the procedure required significantly greater work than typical — for example, severe deformity, prior hardware removal, or complex bone grafting — document that additional work thoroughly and append modifier 22 with a supporting cover letter.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 11.88 |
| Practice expense RVU | 10.14 |
| Malpractice RVU | 2.53 |
| Total RVU | 24.55 |
| Medicare national rate | $819.99 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $819.99 |
HOPD (APC 5115) Hospital outpatient department | $13,116.76 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $9,799.32 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 29907 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Operative note lacks arthroscopic technique specifics, triggering downcoding to a lesser arthroscopy code
- Fluoroscopy or C-arm use billed separately — it is integral to the arthroscopic procedure and bundled under NCCI
- Modifier 50 used in the ASC setting instead of separate LT/RT lines, causing claim adjudication failure
- Bone graft harvesting billed separately without documentation that it was performed at a distinct anatomic site
- Post-op office visits billed without a modifier during the 90-day global period, leading to automatic denial
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01Is fluoroscopy separately billable when used during CPT 29907?
02Can bone graft harvesting be billed separately with 29907?
03How do you bill 29907 when performed on both feet in the same session?
04What modifier applies if the patient returns to the OR during the 90-day global for a wound complication from the fusion?
05When is modifier 22 appropriate for CPT 29907?
06Does CPT 29907 have a global period, and what does it cover?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 03cgsmedicare.comhttps://www.cgsmedicare.com/medicare_dynamic/j15/partb/ptpb/ptp.aspx
- 04mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/29907
- 05emedny.orghttps://www.emedny.org/providermanuals/physician/pdfs/physician%20procedure%20codes%20sect5.pdf
- 06aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/quality/coding-and-reimbursement/
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the arthroscopic portal placement, cartilage preparation technique, bone graft source and placement details, and fixation hardware specifics directly from surgeon dictation. It flags when the operative note lacks the arthroscopic approach language that distinguishes 29907 from open fusion codes — preventing the most common audit flag for this procedure. If the surgeon dictates unusual complexity, the scribe surfaces a modifier 22 prompt automatically.
See how Mira captures CPT 29907 documentation