Knee arthroscopy performed specifically to cut and release intra-articular adhesions, with or without manipulation of the joint to restore range of motion.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $586.19
- Total RVUs
- 17.55
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Knee
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Specify laterality (right or left knee) in both the operative note and the order
- Identify the compartments entered arthroscopically and location of adhesions
- Document the nature, extent, and clinical significance of adhesions — distinguish pathologic fibrosis from incidental findings
- Record whether manipulation was performed and the arc of motion achieved before and after the procedure
- State the indication: prior surgery, trauma, infection, or prolonged immobilization leading to arthrofibrosis
- Confirm that no other concurrent arthroscopic knee procedures were performed in the same session, given the separate procedure designation
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
29884 covers a surgical knee arthroscopy in which the primary goal is lysis — cutting or releasing — of adhesions inside the joint, with or without concurrent manipulation to recover motion. It is designated a 'separate procedure' in CPT, which has a hard consequence: you cannot report 29884 alongside any other arthroscopic knee procedure on the same knee at the same encounter, regardless of payer. This isn't a modifier-59 situation you can work around — the separate procedure designation prohibits it.
The procedure is most commonly indicated for arthrofibrosis or stiff knee syndrome following prior surgery, infection, or prolonged immobilization. The arthroscope is introduced, adhesions are identified and lysed with instruments, and the surgeon may then manipulate the knee to achieve additional range of motion gains. Document the compartments entered, the nature and location of adhesions, the manipulation technique if performed, and the degree of motion recovered at the end of the case.
The 90-day global period applies. Any return to the OR for an unrelated procedure during that window requires modifier 79; an unplanned return for a related complication requires modifier 78. Laterality must be captured with LT or RT — payers routinely deny claims missing side specificity for knee procedures.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 8.07 |
| Practice expense RVU | 7.82 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.66 |
| Total RVU | 17.55 |
| Medicare national rate | $586.19 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $586.19 |
HOPD (APC 5113) Hospital outpatient department | $3,342.87 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $1,644.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 29884 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Unbundling: 29884 billed alongside another arthroscopic knee code on the same knee — the separate procedure designation prohibits this combination
- Missing or incorrect laterality modifier — LT or RT required; absence triggers payer rejection
- Medical necessity not established — documentation lacks a diagnosable cause of adhesion formation (e.g., prior surgery, arthrofibrosis diagnosis) and fails to show conservative treatment exhausted
- Osteoarthritic knee pain as the sole indication — CMS policy excludes arthroscopic debridement/lysis for patients presenting with knee pain only from osteoarthritis
- Global period conflict — procedure billed within the 90-day global of a prior knee arthroscopy without the appropriate modifier (78 or 79)
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01Can I bill 29884 with 29881 (partial meniscectomy) on the same knee in the same session?
02Is modifier 59 ever valid with 29884?
03What ICD-10 codes best support medical necessity for 29884?
04Does the 90-day global period from a prior TKA or knee arthroscopy affect billing 29884?
05What is the site-of-service difference between HOPD and ASC for 29884?
06Can 29884 be billed bilaterally in the same session?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/article.aspx?articleid=52369&ver=11&
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/blog/33738-33738/
- 05aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/discuss/threads/arthroscopic-debridement-with-manipulation-coding-question.202097/
- 06priorityhealth.stylelabs.cloudhttps://priorityhealth.stylelabs.cloud/api/public/content/e8ffaccadd6c4927ae3159cd9fe868df?v=022380ae
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the indication for lysis (prior surgery, arthrofibrosis, stiff knee), the compartments entered, adhesion location and extent, whether manipulation was performed, and the pre- and post-procedure range of motion. This prevents the two most common denials: a vague operative note that can't support medical necessity, and missing documentation that no concurrent arthroscopic procedure was performed — which would trigger a separate-procedure bundling rejection.
See how Mira captures CPT 29884 documentation